Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Ed Dickson ranked our LVP (Lease Valuable Player)


X-Clown on 1

Recommended Posts

Unfortunately, Dickson ended up grading out as the worst blocker at his position this season, his fourth consecutive year with a negative outlook in that regard from Pro Football Focus. He also failed to move the needle in Carolina's aerial attack, gaining just 7.1 yards per reception, the second-lowest mark among tight ends with at least 25 targets.

http://football-players.pointafter.com/stories/10227/least-valuable-worst-players-nfl-2015?utm_source=facebook&utm_medium=social.paid&utm_campaign=ao.sp.fb.dt.10227#16-Carolina-Panthers-Ed-Dickson

I wonder how Gettleman will handle Dickson not living up to his 'blocking TE' standards.  We'd save $1.23 mil in cap space by letting him walk, potentially replacing him with a cheaper FA or mid/late round draft selection.

 

Ed Dickson.PNG

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There look to be several REALLY promising TEs in the draft (Hunter Henry, Austin Hooper... others).  I think a quality TE in the draft could be a great thing for us... someone to train up alongside Greg and to provide depth in case of injuries.  TE is honestly one of the positions where we don't have much depth if Greg were to ever miss a game.... Given how much we rely on him, I'd be much happier if we had better backup for him.

Re: Dickson, I remember some comment by G'man or Rivera that one of the reasons we brought him in was his Play off / Super Bowl experience with Baltimore.  After our loss to SF in 2013, our staff realized we were pretty inexperienced in the postseason.  Well... that's no longer the case.  We've won an NFCCG and been in the Super Bowl.  Might not need Dickson's experience any longer.... be good to get younger guys on board.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am on the CUT DIXON NOW .  He was terrible at blocking.  Considering the fact that Tolbert is not much better as a blocker, we need a better option.  Dixon was despised by Raven fans for these same reasons.  

In fact, I have even considered the possibility of Gettlemen drafting Hunter Henry in the first round.  Crazy, I know, but if no top DE is there, Henry would give us a 2 TE, 4 receiver set (Imagine Henry, Olsen, Benjamin, and Funchess?)   that would not only improve the run game, it would give Cam 2 big, sure-handed TEs.  Henry can improve in the blocking area, but he was solid for Arkansas' run game last year.  He could make the offense better through the air and on the ground--while grooming Olsen's eventual heir. 

Not that this is what I think we should do or will happen, but Henry's impact could be huge.  (Of course, there may be lesser TEs in the draft available, but think about NE's 2 TEs a few seasons ago.  Awesome combo).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dixon is a good Recieving TE, unfortunately we have him at a more blocking style TE.  Dixon has a terrible postseason blocking I saw him totally wife a few blocks in the Super Bowl which did not help the cause of protecting Cam.  He'd still be a top tier backup for Olsen kind of like Anderson is for Cam.  But he doesn't need to be starting at where he has been.

I want the kid from Ohio State.  He is a natural at that TE spot.  Huge athletic guy about Gronk size and speed, Top Tier blocker but really raw as a receiver.  A perfect round 3-4 guy for us.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, tiger7_88 said:

Only loosers spell "least" as "lease".  :P

But seriously, I was actually wondering if the author was making a play on words. Like he was saying to rent or "lease" the player short term or "least" as in was not good. I just read some of it and got my answer. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, tiger7_88 said:

I guess the intended irony was too high-brow for you.  :P

Their, their, people.  Lets knot bee two tough on each other four not selecting the write word when hour own righting is subject to criticism.

(Thought I would throw a line in the water as well).

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would like to draft a late round TE who is a stud blocker with athleticism and size to develop into a solid receiver. Basically, a Brandon Williams who is already a polished blocker. I haven't looked too much into who would be like that in this years draft, but there is surely a 4th or 5th rounder that fits that description. Maybe someone like this guy.

http://www.cbssports.com/nfl/draft/players/1893068/henry-krieger-coble

Iowa TE's definitely know how to block though he lacks athleticism.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The bottom line is we saw long stretches this season where T-Mac wasn't even targeted.  He had games where he went an entire half without seeing a pass thrown his way, and it lead to a bunch of games with 5 or less targets.  If he's healthy and we're not up a stupid amount and only running the ball, I can't see him having more than a game or two next year with 5 or less targets. We were also only 22nd this year in pass attempts, and that was with a rookie #1 and no legitimate 2nd option for half the season.  And even then, we were only 46 pass attempts above 31st place. If we go into next season with T-Mac improved in his 2nd season and a healthy Coker for 17 games, there is absolutely no reason for us to not throw it more.  That right away increases both of their target totals without sacrificing any targets from each other or other players, add in them taking targets from the TEs and RBs on top of that, and your argument just doesn't hold water anymore. You can't look at targets/yards in a vacuum and think next year Coker just takes some from T-Mac.  You have to look at the team as a whole and our situations this year and then project what will happen next year. If he's healthy for 17 games, I'd bet my life savings that T-Mac sees increases across the board, targets/catches/yards/TDs.   Just as Coker will also see career highs in all categories, it's not one vs the other, it's shifting offensive strategy given our personnel, which next year will be much better for our passing game (QB issues aside).
    • C'mon now.... First, you can't switch up your argument once someone points out a major flaw in your point. You're saying we shouldn't expect a big increase in targets/yards for T-Mac, but then shift to talking about averages with Chase when I point out the significant leap he took there once you factor in his missing games.  He saw an increase in targets in 5 less games, averages aside, he saw a significant increase in targets in his 2nd season, what he then did with those targets is actually irrelevant in this discussion. Puka seeing no increase is pointless, as he saw such an absurd amount of targets for a rookie, it's near impossible to see an increase. But the real issue in this post is that you think I'm proving your point by showing how Waddle had to share targets with Hill. Tyreek Hill was a 1st team All Pro who was 2nd in the NFL in yards that season. If you think Jaylen Waddle sharing targets with a 1st team All Pro and a future HOFer is even remotely in the same category as T-Mac needing to share targets with Coker... then you are certifiably insane, lol. If anything, you could make the argument that Coker is to Waddle as T-Mac is to Hill in that discussion (which would then lead to a serious increase in targets/yards for T-Mac).  But even that is insane, as neither T-Mac or Coker will be as good as Hill and Waddle respectively that season.  I love both of their potential, but c'mon now, T-Mac isn't getting 119 catches for 1,700 yards and Coker isn't getting 117 for 1,350 next season.
×
×
  • Create New...