Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

REPORT: Panthers to re-sign WR Stephen Hill and T Mike Remmers


TheSpecialJuan

Recommended Posts

A trio of obvious moves. Hill should be a relatively no-cost move and Alexander's career has literally gone up in smoke.  I'm interested in seeing the tender put on Remmers and if any other teams try to sign him to an offer sheet 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, JakeH said:

A trio of obvious moves. Hill should be a relatively no-cost move and Alexander's career has literally gone up in smoke.  I'm interested in seeing the tender put on Remmers and if any other teams try to sign him to an offer sheet 

Remmers is an ERFA, other teams can't sign him

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Bartin said:

Don't know why we would bother with the tender for Hill. It's more expensive than the minimum and it's not like someone else is going to sign him.

Right. I think Gettleman will not tender Hill, making him a free agent and then the two sides will agree to 1 year base deal.

Works out for both parties.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"Expected to re-sign" per David Newton. It's kind of a throw-away line in the story about Josh's tag, doesn't say anything about Alexander at all either. Still, seem like obvious moves.

As for Remmers, looks like he got the necessary 6 games for an accrued season in 2013 when he bounced around from TB to SD to Min, so RFA should be right. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, jdpanther5 said:

"Expected to re-sign" per David Newton. It's kind of a throw-away line in the story about Josh's tag, doesn't say anything about Alexander at all either. Still, seem like obvious moves.

As for Remmers, looks like he got the necessary 6 games for an accrued season in 2013 when he bounced around from TB to SD to Min, so RFA should be right. 

yes

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • yeah, I can get a little of that.  But that's not what he is posting in his argument just now though.   He said people wouldn't even concede to the literal ability to do it when pressed on the literal ability.  I have never seen that.  He maintains it exists somewhere.  I mean, using anomaly games to make arguments about players just isn't the way.   There wasn't a defender within 10 yards of our guys on 2 of those 3 throws Sunday.  No one within 5 on the 3rd.   That's not Bryce Young answering questions about his play downfield..  That's Bryce Young taking advantage of coverage busts by a bad D.  Which hey, that's part of the game too.  Recognition and seeing the field.   It can't totally be dismissed.   That's still good play.  You want your QBs to make those plays.  But it's not getting into the long standing critique of BY IMO.   
    • Deserved, I wouldn’t use that word. Asked for? For sure. Am I upset over it? No.  People forget that AT was throwing his helmet in frustration last season over his QB’s ineptitude. The same QB was pretty inept to start this year, no guarantee AT would have helped him in those games any more than he did last year.  Just sayin.  And Dan doing him a solid probably did not go unnoticed by players around the league. I think it increases his rep with potential FAs. It sure can’t hurt it. 
    • You think that was the fault of the guy that was lighting it up or maybe the bums around him? Funnily enough, those bums are still being bums in his absence. Who would have thought!
×
×
  • Create New...