Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Remmers gets 2nd round tender


jdpanther5

Recommended Posts

15 hours ago, pantherclaw said:

Remmers is a good RT. Glad to see him retained, as it gives the oline lots of options with a quality player.

Like most RT's,  they struggle with elite pass rushers. 

 

No he is not. Yes he should be kept because he does make for a good backup, but you and everybody else that thinks he's "good" is lying to themselves. He was absolutely our worst O-LINE player.

 

And for everybody else excusing the Super Bowl, are you freaking kidding me? The most important game a team will ever play and that is what we get? He couldn't do any better than that? He couldn't step up a little? Is that what we can expect every time we go to the super bowl from him? If he was good he would have done a lot better than getting our team absolutely humiliated on Super Bowl 50. A good RT would have done an okay or acceptable job. He was atrocious and why would you or anybody want to risk a repeat of the super bowl? We went 17-2 not because of him but in spite of him. Got to improve somewhere, Tackle is a good place to start. 

 

I hate his guts (and Jerrico Suckery also for that matter) and hope he never sees the field again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

yeah von miller played the game of his life in the super bowl and i don't think even a "good" RT would have had a decent game.  miller would have gotten his against anthony munoz in his prime.

remmers is what you want in a backup.  spot starter who can play multiple positions reasonably well against most competition.  daryl williams is going to give him everything he can handle in camp so it's not like he's just being handed the job. 

also just letting the guy walk poses another problem because that takes a situation where a mediocre backup-quality guy was being pushed by a more promising up-and-comer and turns it into a situation where there's a complete vacuum at that position.  that's stupid.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, OldNorthPowell said:

Very good move. He had a bad game in the Super Bowl but overall is a solid back up option and can come in and start if need be.

I agree with this.

But I also wouldn't be unhappy if someone offered him more and we got a 2nd round draft pick out of it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, BigBoss said:

No he is not. Yes he should be kept because he does make for a good backup, but you and everybody else that thinks he's "good" is lying to themselves. He was absolutely our worst O-LINE player.

 

And for everybody else excusing the Super Bowl, are you freaking kidding me? The most important game a team will ever play and that is what we get? He couldn't do any better than that? He couldn't step up a little? Is that what we can expect every time we go to the super bowl from him? If he was good he would have done a lot better than getting our team absolutely humiliated on Super Bowl 50. A good RT would have done an okay or acceptable job. He was atrocious and why would you or anybody want to risk a repeat of the super bowl? We went 17-2 not because of him but in spite of him. Got to improve somewhere, Tackle is a good place to start. 

 

I hate his guts (and Jerrico Suckery also for that matter) and hope he never sees the field again.

You strike me as someone who tends to hold grudges... Am I wrong in this assessment? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Cracka McNasty said:

You strike me as someone who tends to hold grudges... Am I wrong in this assessment? 

Typically no, but I will never forgive Jerrico and Mike for their performance in that game. No it was not all their fault, pretty much everybody who played on our offense was guilty of something.

 

But my gosh, they couldn't do any better than that? In the most important game in Panther history?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, motocross_cat said:

No one was going to stop von miller in the superbowl.

 

Remmers is a good starter and even better guy for depth.  Good move.  Hopefully D Will can come in and be what everyone hopes.

Somebody better than Mike Remmers may have.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hard to interpret some of Brugler's opinions. Capable of running a robust route tree sounds like a lazy thing to say - I'm sure just about every slot TE is capable of running a full route tree... I want to know if he is currently able to (which from tape leads me to a no). Granted, it's pretty common for most receivers/TE not having a full route tree developed before they get drafted. Agility/acceleration after the catch hasn't shown up on his tape (at least his Oregon tape) for those dig/out breaking routes while it has for the seam and slant routes. Agree he has a good physical build and he is very good running seam routes. His build definitely helps him to shield defenders and create a large target point for the QB. Drops were a concern, but it could be focus drops just like T-Mac was/is prone to. Run blocking is an accurate statement, but again, we have only seen him run block in the slot/backfield - inline blocking is a whole different animal. With his athleticism, he definitely has a high ceiling. I just think he also has a low floor and don't like taking that big of a risk on a mid 1st rounder. I think this is a deep TE draft and would much rather target one in the 3rd or later. He's very boom or bust to me - bust in terms of being worth a 1st round pick, not an out of the NFL in a few years type bust. I feel like he gives me Evan Engram vibes. Not saying that Evan Engram was/is a bad NFL player, just that most people would agree he shouldn't have been drafted in the 1st.
    • I mean I would love 6-1. It’s funny the hurricanes usually dominate the first game and win by three or four goals. But keep the second game close. It would be nice if it’s the reverse of that tonight.
    • Brugler has him as TE1 and going to the Ravens in the first.  Apparently Sadiq's football IQ is pretty high (interviewed very well).  Also he was an WR and CB in high school.  This is why I always thought his route running was solid.  I'm sure it needs some polishing but for a TE it's pretty good. nfl.com Built like a bodyguard with a compact, well-defined frame. Capable of running a robust route tree. Gets in and out of breaks with good snap and separation. Vandalizes defensive seams with impunity against man coverage. Survives collisions with catches thanks to his hand strength. Shows off agility and acceleration after the catch. Fits up run blocks with proper positioning and base width. Grips and presses forward with moving feet to stay connected. -Again I don't know if we should take him but if he goes to the right team he could become a scary weapon at the next level.  I just like him as a prospect.
×
×
  • Create New...