Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Reasons I cant trust Pitbulls


Doc Holiday

Recommended Posts

Female pits are the sweetest dogs I've ever known. From being a toddler, and going over into my neighbors yard to play with "sugar bear", often without adult supervision. 

Any breed can technically go off, and attack a person. 

Fun fact,  the Cocker Spanial is guilty of having the most attacks on humans, as reported by the hospitals themselves. 

Yes, pitbulls were breed for fighting, but like ANY breed, it's how it's raised and treated by its owners. 

I'll take a pit over most breeds.  Excellent companions, excellent with kids, low maintenance breed. Lot to love about a Pit.

P.S. While it's unfortunate that the lady passed away, blaming the breed isn't the answer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Kevin Greene said:

This is 100% true.

However when a pekingese goes off you shake it off your pant leg. When a pit bull goes off, people die.

My aunt has a maltese that I swear is the meanest little poo alive, but it weighs 2 pounds, if it tries to bite you, you can punt it across the yard.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, pantherclaw said:

Female pits are the sweetest dogs I've ever known. From being a toddler, and going over into my neighbors yard to play with "sugar bear", often without adult supervision. 

Any breed can technically go off, and attack a person. 

Fun fact,  the Cocker Spanial is guilty of having the most attacks on humans, as reported by the hospitals themselves. 

Yes, pitbulls were breed for fighting, but like ANY breed, it's how it's raised and treated by its owners. 

I'll take a pit over most breeds.  Excellent companions, excellent with kids, low maintenance breed. Lot to love about a Pit.

P.S. While it's unfortunate that the lady passed away, blaming the breed isn't the answer.

I grew up with this story..(who didn't in my generation..) 

51KwALpjeBL._SX258_BO1,204,203,200_.jpg

Didn't realize they were pit bulls when I was young. So I've always had an affection for pits, and I do believe owners are the problem not the breed. 

@Kevin Greene what about a wild pack of pekingese?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My buddy is watching my GSD for me for awhile so I can find a house and all. He has a pit. 

Let's just say my German has pretty much took over the house in a dominant fashion. Pinning it to the ground when it gets out of line. 

Just saying....pits aren't the most badass of the breeds by any stretch. Pits are wonderful dogs if you don't punch them in the face constantly. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Oh, the high expectations after a draft. Keep your expectations low, people. Darin Gantt's latest "Ask The Old Guy" gives life to one of those lessons about pro football reality as a fan: "Rasheed Walker was a three-year starter at left tackle for the Packers, so Freeling is going to have to work. Hunter's got another big 'un in front of him in Bobby Brown III and a different kind of defensive tackle in Tershawn Wharton. Chris Brazzell II's got a lot of traffic at his position. Zakee Wheatley has to be better than the chronically underappreciated Nick Scott, and Sam Hecht is a fifth-round rookie at the hardest position on the line to play, who probably doesn't have immediate positional flexibility, and a solid free agent addition in Luke Fortner in front of him. "Fans generally love their draft class as soon as it arrives, because there is no evidence to the contrary yet. Once guys get on the field, the reality begins to creep in, and the seasoned among you remember that if you get three or four good players out of a draft, that was an amazing draft." https://www.panthers.com/news/ask-the-old-guy-things-looking-up-after-the-draft-monroe-freeling-luke-kuechly-bryce-young-derrick-brown Don't get crazy. Winning the draft (or the offseason BTW) on paper always leads to good feelings and great expectations, especially when you seemingly succeeded the season before, but let's remember that the Panthers are very much a work in progress. Team building takes time. If we get a couple of starters out of the draft, it's a good draft, but three or four would be an amazing draft, and anything more than that is actually sensational--even if entails a few multiple high end rotational players along with three starters. Moreover, kind of within that same vein, the coaches have to let the kids off the chain. Remember the coach-speak of past coaches about competition that is anything but because coaches have their notions about veteran experience? Not saying that they're necessarily wrong, but sometimes I think their reluctance to put the young guys out there is based somewhat in dogma or possibly fear because big stakes are on the line (e.g., their jobs). It can be frustrating to say the least, but the coaches are supposed to know best. Again, I say all of this so that we can remember to temper expectations and keep them within the realm of reality. It's like telling your mind to think of it as something akin to under-promising and over-delivering. Leave room to be pleasantly surprised for the best case scenario, but be cognizant that that rarely happens. I would think at this point, most of us should be able to recognize growth when we see it, and sometimes that growth doesn't manifest itself in the form of immediate supremacy, but a setting of the stage for long term dominance for years to come. It seems like we're on track for an emergence by 2028 or 2029. We still have huge questions, but by 2029, hopefully we will take our seat at the table of the perennial contenders in the NFL.  
    • You’re playing madden we’re talking real football stuff…. He does have you seen his special on internet he def thinks he’s getting paid 
    • Without the team having an identity kinda hard to predict what they value.  They either are really trying to build a balanced team, or preparing for another swing at qb if Bryce doesn’t pan out. Seems like we value the o line but the $ spent there has been underwhelming besides Lewis, you could say it’s because of injuries but still hasn’t been worth the investment. as already stated, the whole handling of Bryce young as a whole has been ass backwards, we spent the years we’re supposed to take advantage of having a qb with a lower cap hit, building the team up to be adequate. now It appears, key word appears, the saints have done it correctly, which is painful to even think about. Regardless, I hope the front office has paid attention to qb contracts recently, such as Tua, Kyler, Daniel jones(pre colts) and don’t settle for subpar qb play at franchise qb rates    
×
×
  • Create New...