Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Does Darryl Williams have a legit shot at replacing Mike Remmers?


IGSaint

Recommended Posts

The Remmers bashing is getting annoying.

Yes, he struggled against speedier pass rushers and got torched in the Super Bowl.

Yes, he played well enough for us to have one of the best/most consistent offenses in the league last season.

Daryl Williams may not be the savior many of you are hoping for. Just saying..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jeremy thought he would replace him, relatively early in the season last year but then he got injured. I would say that means it is likely. Our coaches and front office believe in developing guys, so I would say he'll be improved this year and start, assuming no more injuries.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, IGSaint said:

Or do we have another season to look forward to Remmers getting beat by speedier DE's? 

Darryl was very impressive last year in pre season with about 50/50 of his reps against the 1's and 2's.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, mjligon said:

The Remmers bashing is getting annoying.

Yes, he struggled against speedier pass rushers and got torched in the Super Bowl.

Yes, he played well enough for us to have one of the best/most consistent offenses in the league last season.

Daryl Williams may not be the savior many of you are hoping for. Just saying..

Remmers is not the answer full stop. He choked when it counted. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, mjligon said:

The Remmers bashing is getting annoying.

Yes, he struggled against speedier pass rushers and got torched in the Super Bowl.

Yes, he played well enough for us to have one of the best/most consistent offenses in the league last season.

Daryl Williams may not be the savior many of you are hoping for. Just saying..

You better start learning to deal with it, that's what happens when bad players perform badly 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's not if, its when will Daryl take the job he just a better athlete.  Remmers will have every opportunity to keep the position and even has a leg up as the incumbent, but you can very well bet the FO is gonna be watching closely in camp.  Daryl was on pace to start before he got injured from what i remember.  May the best man win, i'm happy to have them both honestly. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Growl said:

You better start learning to deal with it, that's what happens when bad players perform badly 

Byron Bell is/was bad. Nate Chandler is/was bad. Mike Remmers is an average player who has performed satisfactorily against almost everyone he's faced, and it's unfortunate for both him and Carolina that they faced arguably the best edge rusher in the NFL in the Super Bowl. Not saying that Remmers is an answer or that Carolina shouldn't look to upgrade, because they should, but calling him bad is incorrect.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not sure Daryl Williams is the answer for countering small / speed DEs like Beasley and Miller.  He has very long arms but was in the second percentile among all NFL OTs for lateral agility per his combine results.  By measurables, Remmers should be more agile while Williams much stronger in the run game.

The caveat, of course, is that measurables aren't everything and he'll get his opportunity.  I think he can be a better OT than Remmers but I think he might have the same liability (speed on the edge).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, KSpan said:

Byron Bell is/was bad. Nate Chandler is/was bad. Mike Remmers is an average player who has performed satisfactorily against almost everyone he's faced, and it's unfortunate for both him and Carolina that they faced arguably the best edge rusher in the NFL in the Super Bowl. Not saying that Remmers is an answer or that Carolina shouldn't look to upgrade, because they should, but calling him bad is incorrect.

Take a look at who you're responding to.

It is not worth it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree with Kspan and Mjligon a bit here. Remmers is at a skill level that sets him above 55-60% of the starting RTs in the league. That's not faint praise -- he can handle the game to game duties of the position well and has stood up under pressure from a lot of the league's best. Is he elite? No, and the Superb Owl showed that he couldn't beat the best edge rusher in the game without help. But darned few other players were going to, either.

Remmers has experience, strength, agility and the smarts to play the position at a very high level and he was instrumental in providing protection for the #1 offense in the NFL last year. That's no small deal. If/when he goes out on the market, someone will sweep him up in the first week of FA and put him into their starting lineup. He'll get good, but not great, money and he'll serve them well for five years, maybe more.

Williams, by all accounts, has incredible potential. Massive strength, good technique, modest but workable agility. He has the makings of the classic roadgrader at RT. What he doesn't have, though, is real experience against first team defenders and pass rush specialists. He looked great in the preseason, but the big time DL players aren't giving it anywhere near their all and you don't see complicated stunts. On field learning and watching from the sidelines with a coach are the way to go here. 

I'd like to see Williams get some in game experience this season. Maybe they can rotate him in when the Panthers have the lead. Supplant Remmers right now? Not going to happen. Experience and chemistry mean too much to RR for him to just cast a guy to the side because some fans only watched the Superb Owl and didn't pay attention for the rest of the season.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Khyber53 said:

I'd like to see Williams get some in game experience this season. Maybe they can rotate him in when the Panthers have the lead. Supplant Remmers right now? Not going to happen. Experience and chemistry mean too much to RR for him to just cast a guy to the side because some fans only watched the Superb Owl and didn't pay attention for the rest of the season.

Final paragraph pie.

Edit:  Not that the rest wasn't good, but that last one nailed it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Khyber53 said:

I agree with Kspan and Mjligon a bit here. Remmers is at a skill level that sets him above 55-60% of the starting RTs in the league. That's not faint praise -- he can handle the game to game duties of the position well and has stood up under pressure from a lot of the league's best. Is he elite? No, and the Superb Owl showed that he couldn't beat the best edge rusher in the game without help. But darned few other players were going to, either.

Remmers has experience, strength, agility and the smarts to play the position at a very high level and he was instrumental in providing protection for the #1 offense in the NFL last year. That's no small deal. If/when he goes out on the market, someone will sweep him up in the first week of FA and put him into their starting lineup. He'll get good, but not great, money and he'll serve them well for five years, maybe more.

Williams, by all accounts, has incredible potential. Massive strength, good technique, modest but workable agility. He has the makings of the classic roadgrader at RT. What he doesn't have, though, is real experience against first team defenders and pass rush specialists. He looked great in the preseason, but the big time DL players aren't giving it anywhere near their all and you don't see complicated stunts. On field learning and watching from the sidelines with a coach are the way to go here. 

I'd like to see Williams get some in game experience this season. Maybe they can rotate him in when the Panthers have the lead. Supplant Remmers right now? Not going to happen. Experience and chemistry mean too much to RR for him to just cast a guy to the side because some fans only watched the Superb Owl and didn't pay attention for the rest of the season.

 

Well said.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The bottom line is we saw long stretches this season where T-Mac wasn't even targeted.  He had games where he went an entire half without seeing a pass thrown his way, and it lead to a bunch of games with 5 or less targets.  If he's healthy and we're not up a stupid amount and only running the ball, I can't see him having more than a game or two next year with 5 or less targets. We were also only 22nd this year in pass attempts, and that was with a rookie #1 and no legitimate 2nd option for half the season.  And even then, we were only 46 pass attempts above 31st place. If we go into next season with T-Mac improved in his 2nd season and a healthy Coker for 17 games, there is absolutely no reason for us to not throw it more.  That right away increases both of their target totals without sacrificing any targets from each other or other players, add in them taking targets from the TEs and RBs on top of that, and your argument just doesn't hold water anymore. You can't look at targets/yards in a vacuum and think next year Coker just takes some from T-Mac.  You have to look at the team as a whole and our situations this year and then project what will happen next year. If he's healthy for 17 games, I'd bet my life savings that T-Mac sees increases across the board, targets/catches/yards/TDs.   Just as Coker will also see career highs in all categories, it's not one vs the other, it's shifting offensive strategy given our personnel, which next year will be much better for our passing game (QB issues aside).
    • C'mon now.... First, you can't switch up your argument once someone points out a major flaw in your point. You're saying we shouldn't expect a big increase in targets/yards for T-Mac, but then shift to talking about averages with Chase when I point out the significant leap he took there once you factor in his missing games.  He saw an increase in targets in 5 less games, averages aside, he saw a significant increase in targets in his 2nd season, what he then did with those targets is actually irrelevant in this discussion. Puka seeing no increase is pointless, as he saw such an absurd amount of targets for a rookie, it's near impossible to see an increase. But the real issue in this post is that you think I'm proving your point by showing how Waddle had to share targets with Hill. Tyreek Hill was a 1st team All Pro who was 2nd in the NFL in yards that season. If you think Jaylen Waddle sharing targets with a 1st team All Pro and a future HOFer is even remotely in the same category as T-Mac needing to share targets with Coker... then you are certifiably insane, lol. If anything, you could make the argument that Coker is to Waddle as T-Mac is to Hill in that discussion (which would then lead to a serious increase in targets/yards for T-Mac).  But even that is insane, as neither T-Mac or Coker will be as good as Hill and Waddle respectively that season.  I love both of their potential, but c'mon now, T-Mac isn't getting 119 catches for 1,700 yards and Coker isn't getting 117 for 1,350 next season.
×
×
  • Create New...