Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Players Under Contract Through 2017


Recommended Posts

A great way to look at our upcoming draft is through evaluating the positions which we have players signed through 2017 and beyond.  Of course Gettleman's mantra is BPA, but we know it is influenced by other factors.

 

To understand how our GM thinks, you have to realize he thinks years ahead when making moves.  The short 1-year contracts are advantageous in gaining us compensatory picks.  Drafting well and re-signing core players is also key.  Looking at future position needs is key to retaining talent.

 

Here is what our roster looks like in 2017. I have organized it in terms of being relatively set, not needing immediate help, needs more attention, and completely void of players.

The following positions are relatively set:


QB: Cam Newton (5), Derek Anderson (2), Joe Webb (2)

RB: Jonathan Stewart (2), Cameron Artis-Payne (3), Brandon Wegher (2)

TE: Greg Olsen (3), Ed Dickson (2)

MLB: Luke Kuechly (6), David Mayo (3)

NT: Star Lotulelei (2), Paul Soliai (2)

 

The following positions do not need immediate help:

WR: Kelvin Benjamin (2), Devin Funchess (3), Kevin Norwood (2), Corey Brown (RFA)

FB: Mike Tolbert (2)

SLB: Shaq Thompson (3)

WLB: Thomas Davis (2)

CB2: Bene Benwikere (2)

RG: Trai Turner (2)

RT: Daryl Williams (3)

RDE: Kony Ealy (2)

LG: Andrew Norwell (RFA)
 

The following positions will need more attention:

C: Gino Gradkowski (3), Tyler Larsen (2)

LDE: Ryan Delaire (2), Aurthur Miley (2)

FS: Tre Boston (2)

SS: Dean Marlowe (2)

 

The following positions are currently completely void of players in 2017

LT, DT2, CB1, nCB,

 

Of course, this will change when players are re-signed.  Kawaan Short and Kurt Coleman come to mind.  Also, next year it becomes fiscally advantageous to cut Stewart. But, as far as looking at current contracts, it may help predict our draft moving forward.
 

Does this information change the way you approach the draft?  You better bet Gettleman is well aware of this.

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You can probably add Norwell and Philly as under contract. Even though they aren't technically, they will be RFAs and we will without a doubt give both of them a 2nd round tender which basically eliminates another team signing them to an offer sheet.

Nice work.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Bartin said:

You can probably add Norwell and Philly as under contract. Even though they aren't technically, they will be RFAs and we will without a doubt give both of them a 2nd round tender which basically eliminates another team signing them to an offer sheet.

Nice work.

I agree completely.  Fixed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

when I've been drafting  on Fanspeak, I've been drafting for the future in every round.  Nice to see things laid out like this.  I don't think we'll find a first rounder starter unless we take a safety.

One position that no one talks about that I've been trying to address is center.  It wouldn't surprise me if Ryan retires with tread left on the tires just like his buddy Gross.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Captain Morgan said:

 It wouldn't surprise me if Ryan retires with tread left on the tires just like his buddy Gross.

Especially considering the two voidable years on his contract, after this season.  Very good opportunity for him to mosey on out, if he so chooses.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, L-TownCat said:

Do the voidable years still hit the cap if he retires?

I'm not a cap guru by any stretch, so take with a grain of salt.  I think that we'd take the cap hit of whatever voidable years are on the contract, at the time the contract is voided.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, Nick_81 said:

I'm not a cap guru by any stretch, so take with a grain of salt.  I think that we'd take the cap hit of whatever voidable years are on the contract, at the time the contract is voided.

That's what happened with Harper & Cotchery, I believe.  Sounds right.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On April 12, 2016 at 11:27 AM, Bartin said:

You can probably add Norwell and Philly as under contract. Even though they aren't technically, they will be RFAs and we will without a doubt give both of them a 2nd round tender which basically eliminates another team signing them to an offer sheet.

Nice work.

Norwell is gonna be a 1st round tender after this season. Next priority for the Panthers is to lock up the interior of OL & DL espeically when the foundation and system of your team is built around the interior. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My thoughts are that Gman wants to keep this team as young as possible, building through the draft, so that if a core player does emerge out of our draft class each year, we have the roster built with replacements for our aging vets whom many are still looking for big pay days

...Shaq, Williams, Bene', Boston etc.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yeah and I am doubtful he can offer that consistently. I don’t have many years left at my age and in my view we have wasted two and this whole exercise with him was always a three year minimum.  I am out on that with a guy I don’t believe in, and never believed in, it has sucked. To me it is a costly detour off the right track. Years.    But I am not so rigid that I can’t see excellence. He needs to display it though, consistently before I change my outlook.  
    • No, when I said rage, I meant rage, which only applies to certain fans on this board. Your timeline of trying to assess whether he is the future or not is really tied to the discussions surrounding his second contract. If this team is going to commit to some monster contract while he has shown nothing but glimpses of brilliance would be deservedly worrisome, so the clock is genuinely ticking for him to settle into something resembling his final form. Perhaps a best case scenario is that he plays well, the team succeeds, but he does so with a more limited role that makes the rest of the league view him as a game manager, and his second contract value reflects that. Then he continues to improve and becomes a bargain comparatively while not handicapping the team around him, and we enter an era of consistent championship competitiveness that the fanbase has craved for decades and has never really experienced before. But that requires many, many things to go right and for Bryce himself to facilitate that if he ends up being the quarterback of the future.
    • Exactly. And the flame throwers as well, get location benefits from not going all out. But they have it in reserve.  Not sure how much Greg had but he was an artist.  There was a YouTube I came across last year or maybe even 2023 and I don’t how to even find now but it had two NFL QBs I want say one was Carr from the Raiders but I don’t really remember  The point of it is they stood side by side throwing identical distances to identical targets. Radar gun was used.  They threw the normal effort (not all out) and it was measured etc. Then they were asked to throw their ‘fastball’. They were missing and most often they were missing high. It demonstrated the same principle.    edit: and applying that to arm strength, give me the guy that doesn’t need max effort to have good velocity. The margins are so narrow with less velocity in tne NFL the defenders can Close on it and this is a league where they value down to the 100th of a second level. It is that tight 
×
×
  • Create New...