Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Players Under Contract Through 2017


Recommended Posts

A great way to look at our upcoming draft is through evaluating the positions which we have players signed through 2017 and beyond.  Of course Gettleman's mantra is BPA, but we know it is influenced by other factors.

 

To understand how our GM thinks, you have to realize he thinks years ahead when making moves.  The short 1-year contracts are advantageous in gaining us compensatory picks.  Drafting well and re-signing core players is also key.  Looking at future position needs is key to retaining talent.

 

Here is what our roster looks like in 2017. I have organized it in terms of being relatively set, not needing immediate help, needs more attention, and completely void of players.

The following positions are relatively set:


QB: Cam Newton (5), Derek Anderson (2), Joe Webb (2)

RB: Jonathan Stewart (2), Cameron Artis-Payne (3), Brandon Wegher (2)

TE: Greg Olsen (3), Ed Dickson (2)

MLB: Luke Kuechly (6), David Mayo (3)

NT: Star Lotulelei (2), Paul Soliai (2)

 

The following positions do not need immediate help:

WR: Kelvin Benjamin (2), Devin Funchess (3), Kevin Norwood (2), Corey Brown (RFA)

FB: Mike Tolbert (2)

SLB: Shaq Thompson (3)

WLB: Thomas Davis (2)

CB2: Bene Benwikere (2)

RG: Trai Turner (2)

RT: Daryl Williams (3)

RDE: Kony Ealy (2)

LG: Andrew Norwell (RFA)
 

The following positions will need more attention:

C: Gino Gradkowski (3), Tyler Larsen (2)

LDE: Ryan Delaire (2), Aurthur Miley (2)

FS: Tre Boston (2)

SS: Dean Marlowe (2)

 

The following positions are currently completely void of players in 2017

LT, DT2, CB1, nCB,

 

Of course, this will change when players are re-signed.  Kawaan Short and Kurt Coleman come to mind.  Also, next year it becomes fiscally advantageous to cut Stewart. But, as far as looking at current contracts, it may help predict our draft moving forward.
 

Does this information change the way you approach the draft?  You better bet Gettleman is well aware of this.

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You can probably add Norwell and Philly as under contract. Even though they aren't technically, they will be RFAs and we will without a doubt give both of them a 2nd round tender which basically eliminates another team signing them to an offer sheet.

Nice work.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Bartin said:

You can probably add Norwell and Philly as under contract. Even though they aren't technically, they will be RFAs and we will without a doubt give both of them a 2nd round tender which basically eliminates another team signing them to an offer sheet.

Nice work.

I agree completely.  Fixed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

when I've been drafting  on Fanspeak, I've been drafting for the future in every round.  Nice to see things laid out like this.  I don't think we'll find a first rounder starter unless we take a safety.

One position that no one talks about that I've been trying to address is center.  It wouldn't surprise me if Ryan retires with tread left on the tires just like his buddy Gross.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Captain Morgan said:

 It wouldn't surprise me if Ryan retires with tread left on the tires just like his buddy Gross.

Especially considering the two voidable years on his contract, after this season.  Very good opportunity for him to mosey on out, if he so chooses.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, L-TownCat said:

Do the voidable years still hit the cap if he retires?

I'm not a cap guru by any stretch, so take with a grain of salt.  I think that we'd take the cap hit of whatever voidable years are on the contract, at the time the contract is voided.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, Nick_81 said:

I'm not a cap guru by any stretch, so take with a grain of salt.  I think that we'd take the cap hit of whatever voidable years are on the contract, at the time the contract is voided.

That's what happened with Harper & Cotchery, I believe.  Sounds right.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On April 12, 2016 at 11:27 AM, Bartin said:

You can probably add Norwell and Philly as under contract. Even though they aren't technically, they will be RFAs and we will without a doubt give both of them a 2nd round tender which basically eliminates another team signing them to an offer sheet.

Nice work.

Norwell is gonna be a 1st round tender after this season. Next priority for the Panthers is to lock up the interior of OL & DL espeically when the foundation and system of your team is built around the interior. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My thoughts are that Gman wants to keep this team as young as possible, building through the draft, so that if a core player does emerge out of our draft class each year, we have the roster built with replacements for our aging vets whom many are still looking for big pay days

...Shaq, Williams, Bene', Boston etc.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • lol, that second part is quite literally one of the dumbest things ever. Having or not having guaranteed contracts has absolutely nothing to do with how much these billionaires have to pay.  Because there is a hard cap and a minimum cap spend requirement, and teams either use their cap or roll it over to use it all the next year, so the owners have to pay the same amount of money in the end no matter what. Having fully guaranteed contracts in the NFL would only hurt salary cap management, and thus would end up screwing over the team and its fan base when teams kiss on signings as they take up cap room that is needed to improve the roster. Look at the Browns with Watson, they gave him the fully guaranteed deal and all it’s doing is sucking up massive cap space now.  If they hadn’t done that, the owner would still be paying the same amount of money each year as that cap space would still be used elsewhere. If you want to argue for fully guaranteed contracts because the players deserve it, that’s an entirely different argument and a fair one to discuss.  But anyone against fully guaranteed deals isn’t doing it to argue for the billionaire owners.
    • Start posting in threads in the other forums instead of just creating threads. No one comes over here so you aren't starting conversations.  Get your ass up to 100 posts. It's not that hard. Don't create 100 posts. Contribute to conversations. 
    • Ryabkin could be the steal of the draft, he was a Top 10 pick heading into last season and had a rough year.  Lots of GMs passed on him because of that and his workouts. Pick has really high upside and Svech should be able to translate Rod tearing his arse a new one for making dumb plays since Svech has had several years of it.  🤣😂
×
×
  • Create New...