Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

NFC personnel director not impressed with WR class


top dawg

Recommended Posts

As one who is a little skeptical of the WR class, I can say that I am not surprised that an unnamed personnel director has referred to this WR class as "a bad group."

"It's just a bad group," the director said, per the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel. "There's not one sure thing."

http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap3000000654976/article/nfc-personnel-director-says-drafts-wr-class-a-bad-group

Now the good thing is that we are probably in pretty good shape with what we already have if this guy's opinion turns out to be true. I mean it's not like we need a consensus WR1 as much as we need a playmaker with exceptional hands. Furthermore, if there is some legitimate talent to be found, if anybody can identify it, Gettleman and company can. 

And lastly, some of you might really want to rethink Hunter Henry. As unbelievable as it may seem, he could turn out to be the surest wideout in this class. At the very least, he could be just what the doctor ordered for our offense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This guy sounds like a few of our own Huddlerz. Some on here pretty much think the whole draft class is poo.

 

Whereas, there are a few of us who truly believe there is talent in this draft. Maybe not sure fire All Pro talent. But you still need talented kids to compete.

 

Anyway. Thanks for a thread that isn't about Josh.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, thomas96 said:

Treadwell at 30 would be a dream come true.

I just don't see it happening, but anything is possible. 

I just wonder if Dave would have him ranked ahead of Hunter Henry, especially considering that we already have KB and Funch.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Honestly, Shephard is the closest thing to a sure thing in this draft, in my opinion.  The only other I'd consider giving that label to is Doctson.  I think Treadwell has a VERY high chance of being very good, but he could also be another Dwayne Jarrett or Brandon Lafell.  Worth the gamble imo, though.  Coleman has a high chance of being another Brandin Cooks, Tavon Austin, etc etc etc, imo.  I'd still take him at 30, but not if I was a team in the top 20 though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, top dawg said:

I just don't see it happening, but anything is possible. 

I just wonder if Dave would have him ranked ahead of Hunter Henry, especially considering that we already have KB and Funch

Funch isn't anything like Treadwell. Funch belongs in the slot. With Treadwell, Funch and KB and then Philly/Ginn as situational players our receiver group would be tremendous. Treadwell's going to be like Dez Bryant. If he falls to us he will almost certainly be BPA. But I don't see him falling. Henry's solid but is more of a 35-50 prospect, in my opinion. Treadwell's top 15 on my board. I would be DG has Treadwell above him but who knows. I'm no expert, just a dumb fan like everyone else here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Cooks had over 1100 yards last season.  He's really good.

Agreed on Shepard though.

huh, I didn't know that.  I just knew every time I've seen him play he hasn't looked good.  I think a Jimmy Grahamless, old Colston, and no other receiving targets in a passing game stat inflating system might have a little to do with those 1100 yards though.  They've had a few nobody WRs these past few years putting up solid stats.  1100 is impressive though, won't deny it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i mean the #1 guy in the Ole Miss MF I like but im not blown away by..

 

 

good thing we have a bonified #1 beast and another closer to 6'5 than 6'4 beast younger than me bout to beast out the #2..  seems like the perfect draft to get our #3 in the mid rounds..  if not, i like PhillyB.     not the alchohol phillyB, the football phillyB

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • He does have luke-like traits, but ......ugh I hate to spend draft currency on the low valued ILB. Same bitachin I did about Dan traded up for brooks, he even pulled the classic " we had a 1st round grade on him"  Hell I rather see if Wallace finally learned how to get his body ready for a NFL season. Toss this in the pile too, Id be ok with Claudin Cherelus starting. I think Lloyd will elevate any player next to him and Claudin would break out, he's got the same health issues like Sanders.....he's climbing the mountain and pulls a hammy.  Plus since this a great and deep ILB group, the UDFA pool should have a few players that get overlooked.   
    • Typically stay away from women's soccer but little hit today 
    • Dang I wish I could add, but Im not the NBA fan like I was years ago. I will just share the little I can- Philly is a big NO form me. Knicks does not scare me, I rather face them over Philly. If Celtics are healthy, I put them next to Philly in NO terms.  My issue with this hornet team is that they are too young about playoff NBA ball. Close games are not their friends mainly cause there's no OLD head to calm them down. Plus living by 3 in close setting, these misses hurt young teams more.  Just enjoy the ride and see the growth, playoff ball is a different sport....maybe Ball can MVP this thing a couple series?!?!?!
×
×
  • Create New...