Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Barnwell's best offensive triplets. Cam, Stew, Olsen number 4.


nctarheel0619

Recommended Posts

121315-NFL-Greg-Olsen-Jonathan-Stewart-M

 

The top ten is:
1. Steelers: Big Ben, Antonio Brown, and Le'veon Bell. 
2. Patriots: Brady, Edelman, and Gronk.
3. Packers: Rodgers, Jordy Nelson, and Randle Cobb. 
4. Panthers: Cam, Stewart, and Greg Olsen. 
5. Cardinals: Carson Palmer, Larry Fitzgerald, and John Brown.
6. Cowboys: Tony Romo, Ezekiel Elliott, and Dez Bryant.
7. Bengals: Andy Dalton, A.J. Green, and Tyler Eifert. 
8. Falcons: Matt Ryan, Devonta Freeman, and Julio Jones.
9. Jaguars: Blake Bortles, Allen Robinson, and Allen Hurns.
10. Saints: Drew Brees, Mark Ingram, and Brandin Cooks. 

http://espn.go.com/nfl/story/_/id/16199944/bill-barnwell-ranks-nfl-offensive-triplets-all-32-teams-pittsburgh-steelers-new-england-patriots-top-list

Link to comment
Share on other sites

49 minutes ago, Nate Dogg said:

Ezekiel is getting appointed as a star before he's even played a snap smh.

I keep see articles about him possibility running for 1500 yards this year....absolutely in no way does that happen.

The media can keep hyping the Cowboys but it's been over 20 years since they've done anything of relevance. Everyone outside of their fanbase groups them with the Browns, Bills, Jags, and Raiders now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, bleedsgreenandgold said:

I keep see articles about him possibility running for 1500 yards this year....absolutely in no way does that happen.

I have no idea how many total yards he'll end up having but, behind that OL, it will end up being a lot of them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • No, I'm starved for contention. If you can't see that and keep wanting to turn things like this back around on T-Mac, then you're just either being purposefully obtuse, or is a fan who is happy having 5-6 win seasons just because we're so used to the 3-4 win seasons and you like "just being better"
    • Chiefs had zero penalties last night
    • You mean the guy who took over a franchise that hadn't had a losing season in the previous 4 seasons... who proceeded to get his team into the playoffs in 3 of his first 4 seasons, only to win 2 games in said playoffs, to then go on to having a 54-74 career record and never won another playoff game after those first two? Who then after being fired from that job, took over a team that was 30-18 in the 3 seasons before he got the job, got into the playoffs that first season, lost their first postseasons game, and then went on to have a 6-26 record over the next 2 seasons? You're literally proving my point by bringing up someone who's claim to fame is that quote. If you just play to win the game, you're never going to be a successful franchise.  You need to play to win the game while ALSO working to make your players better.  Having the former without the latter is a picture perfect recipe to become a stagnant franchise. That's how you work towards being a winning franchise who can contend in the postseason.  And sure, having a stagnant franchise that makes the playoffs every other season is better than what we currently are, but that's not what I strive for with our Panthers, I want to actually contend for championships in my lifetime.
×
×
  • Create New...