Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Cam Newton's contract 2nd-best value among QB's


X-Clown on 1

Recommended Posts

Cam Newton's contract ranked as 2nd-best value among NFL quarterbacks:

Not sure who to thank more for this, Gettleman for getting the right deal, or Cam for elevating his game higher than what they are now perceiving his worth..

http://pantherswire.usatoday.com/2016/06/28/cam-newtons-contract-ranked-as-2nd-best-value-among-nfl-quarterbacks/

Quote

“It might seem odd that a player making over $20 million per year is “underpaid,” but it isn’t until 2019 that Newton is among the top seven quarterbacks in terms of cap hit,” Jahnke writes. “It isn’t farfetched to think that, in a few years when some of the top quarterbacks have retired, Newton could be the best quarterback in the NFL. Even though he is eventually projected to be among the top five highest-paid quarterbacks with how much the salary cap is increasing, it wouldn’t be surprising if other QBs get new contracts for more money. As long as Cam Newton continues to play as well as he did in 2015, he will be underpaid for years to come.”

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cam is in a perfect position to accept a fair deal in order to keep our team competitive. The more he wins, the more his star power is going to rise. His celebrity appeal is already off the charts. He is the 2nd highest endorsement earner behind Peyton and he hasn't even won a super bowl yet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Nate Dogg said:

He is the 2nd highest endorsement earner

He's only underpaid when it comes to his Panthers paycheck. I think he knew it was unwise, in regard to the success of the team, to try and break the bank with his contract. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, Jangler said:

When some of the top QBs retire? Cam is already a top QB in the league. Anybody that doesn't think so, is just being disingenuous, or still has bias against Cam, the Panthers or both.

Well, Nate Burleson agrees. He got everybody's jimmies rustled with his list.  Carson Palmer though?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is only ONE QB I would probably take over Cam, and that's Rodgers, and even I hesistate on that because we all saw just how mediocre Rodgers is without Jordy.

Other than that, I have a hard time taking anybody else (maybe Wilson, but I hate his fake ass). Brady is on the out, Luck is a turnover machine and overhyped, Big Ben is still a good QB but getting injury prone, Brees is on the out but still has a couple good years left in him, and no way in hell i would EVER take Palmer over Newton.


So according to that, it isn't "farfetched" to say that Newton is THE BEST QB IN THE LEAGUE NOW!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Think Cam will define so many things before he is done and sure hope he will decide to do his career as a Panther.

He gave us a very budget friendly deal for who he is and what he can do.

You know that a 53 man roster and if every one got 3 mil. we would be over cap.  We have some great talents taking a little less to be part of something special. 

This Panther's Team has a chance to rewrite the record books.  I for one am in favor of it!!!!

Go Cam Go Panthers !!!!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Datawire said:

Well, Nate Burleson agrees. He got everybody's jimmies rustled with his list.  Carson Palmer though?

 

I can't in good conscience keep Rodgers or Breesus off this list. Breesus has been criminally under rated his entire career and I take him over Palmer or the rapist any day of the week. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, Datawire said:

Well, Nate Burleson agrees. He got everybody's jimmies rustled with his list.  Carson Palmer though?

 

He got the top 3 right if you are starting your own team. There is no other QB i would take on my team than Cam. Age and versatility are on his side. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The bottom line is we saw long stretches this season where T-Mac wasn't even targeted.  He had games where he went an entire half without seeing a pass thrown his way, and it lead to a bunch of games with 5 or less targets.  If he's healthy and we're not up a stupid amount and only running the ball, I can't see him having more than a game or two next year with 5 or less targets. We were also only 22nd this year in pass attempts, and that was with a rookie #1 and no legitimate 2nd option for half the season.  And even then, we were only 46 pass attempts above 31st place. If we go into next season with T-Mac improved in his 2nd season and a healthy Coker for 17 games, there is absolutely no reason for us to not throw it more.  That right away increases both of their target totals without sacrificing any targets from each other or other players, add in them taking targets from the TEs and RBs on top of that, and your argument just doesn't hold water anymore. You can't look at targets/yards in a vacuum and think next year Coker just takes some from T-Mac.  You have to look at the team as a whole and our situations this year and then project what will happen next year. If he's healthy for 17 games, I'd bet my life savings that T-Mac sees increases across the board, targets/catches/yards/TDs.   Just as Coker will also see career highs in all categories, it's not one vs the other, it's shifting offensive strategy given our personnel, which next year will be much better for our passing game (QB issues aside).
    • C'mon now.... First, you can't switch up your argument once someone points out a major flaw in your point. You're saying we shouldn't expect a big increase in targets/yards for T-Mac, but then shift to talking about averages with Chase when I point out the significant leap he took there once you factor in his missing games.  He saw an increase in targets in 5 less games, averages aside, he saw a significant increase in targets in his 2nd season, what he then did with those targets is actually irrelevant in this discussion. Puka seeing no increase is pointless, as he saw such an absurd amount of targets for a rookie, it's near impossible to see an increase. But the real issue in this post is that you think I'm proving your point by showing how Waddle had to share targets with Hill. Tyreek Hill was a 1st team All Pro who was 2nd in the NFL in yards that season. If you think Jaylen Waddle sharing targets with a 1st team All Pro and a future HOFer is even remotely in the same category as T-Mac needing to share targets with Coker... then you are certifiably insane, lol. If anything, you could make the argument that Coker is to Waddle as T-Mac is to Hill in that discussion (which would then lead to a serious increase in targets/yards for T-Mac).  But even that is insane, as neither T-Mac or Coker will be as good as Hill and Waddle respectively that season.  I love both of their potential, but c'mon now, T-Mac isn't getting 119 catches for 1,700 yards and Coker isn't getting 117 for 1,350 next season.
    • Especially since we’re neck and neck with them for the play in
×
×
  • Create New...