Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Two Panthers in Top 10 of Top 100 Players


dldove77

Recommended Posts

10 minutes ago, CPantherKing said:

45 General Managers can be credited with drafting or trading for players in the top 100 players.

Dave Gettleman makes the list for the first time tied for 29th with 17 other GMs who have one players on the list.

Any guess which GM is #1 for the top 100 players of 2016?

hurney-marty-120419-8col.jpg

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, uncfan888 said:

Your shtick is getting old. We all know you hate gettleman.. you don't have to find some way to bash him in every thread. Root for a different team

Bashing him by grouping him with the best GMs in the league who have a player on the top 100? That is bashing Gettleman now? So, anything less than top position for Gettleman is bashing him? Please. Some people love the man way too much.

It was a simple question.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, uncfan888 said:

He is either Hurney or related to Hurney. It's pathetic. 

well, it is kinda a funny/interesting note in reality...if the history of other stuff is ignored.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, CPantherKing said:

Incorrect. He is #2. The GM at #1 has drafted all of his players.

what are you going off of for the number count?  If the GM drafted and traded for a player during his tenure?  Hurney has what 8 of those?  (7 drafted)

you got me, eyeballing the list I can't find a GM I can tie to more than that.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, CRA said:

what are you going off of for the number count?  If the GM drafted and traded for a player during his tenure?  Hurney has what 8 of those?  (7 drafted)

 

I do believe there is a GM who drafted all 8 players on the top 100. Hurney has 8 when you count the trade for Olsen. I will go back and check.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, The Huddler said:

Kinda easier to nail a top player when youre constantly picking in the top ten, and one of them being the #1 overall pick. 

 

Such good GMs draft there ya know? 

take out his top 10 picks and he still has 6 counting which puts him still with a high number and near the top of the leaderboard.

Hurney overall was a good drafter (vs other actual GMs)  Hurney was a HORIBBLE GM when it came to managing contracts for "his" guys.  I think people make Hurney out to be worse than he was.  He was actually decent early on.  It was when his guys needed to get paid it all fell apart.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, CRA said:

take out his top 10 picks and he still has 6 counting which puts him still with a high number and near the top of the leaderboard.

Hurney was a overall a good drafter.  Hurney was a HORIBBLE GM when it came to managing contracts for "his" guys.  I think people make Hurney out to be worse than he was.  He was actually decent early on.  It was when his guys needed to get paid it all fell apart.

Exactly. I was a hirney supporter till the bitter end. 

 

But I really like Gman. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, The Huddler said:

Exactly. I was a hirney supporter till the bitter end. 

 

But I really like Gman. 

I thought Hurney was a good GM up until a certain point.  Once he had to figure paying him guys....I was done with him.  Most people I think know I was done with him when he paid both RBs to featured deals.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I've seen enough tape review to see that we run crossers...we have dudes in the middle of the field. I have to think that this is a harder area for someone of Bryce's stature to hit. You have to see directly over the center of the line and is probably where the most interceptions happen (he has thrown a LOT of his picks by not seeing a dude in the middle of the field).
    • I’m pretty sure we did end up getting the first in that drive, but I don’t remember. It was obviously a catch the ball didn’t move 
    • While I don't think NFL games are fully rigged, it's certainly closer to a scripted outcome than we all think. The NFL by their own admission in court is not a fair and balanced sporting event. It is a managed entertainment product, a "spectacle" as they've put it, that now has sports betting as a huge financial pillar of their business model. It's ridicuously naive to still think the NFL isn't using referees to manage the games towards certain outcomes, using "replays in the booth" and overturning calls, choosing to overlook penalties at critical moments and calling questionable and sometimes phantom game changing penalties at other critical junctures of games. The NFL has always done this going as far back as the '60s, and they were investigated by the FBI in the '70s which found a large number of ownership groups had ties to the mob. So when the overwhelming majority of the moneyline bets were on the Panthers vs the Saints last week, and suddenly we see some strange and ticky tack penalties we've rarely seen called on the Panthers all year, I just know there's more going on behind the scenes. And suddenly next week, the Panthers will probably be nudged to a win, to keep the NFC South race interesting, as I see the Bucs are the favorite as of now and most moneyline bets will trend towards the Bucs until during the game when the Bucs are leading heading into the 4th quarter, and the Panthers are nudged to a win. At least, that's what the NFL and Vegas probably want to happen. 
×
×
  • Create New...