Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Brady's appeal denied


Mr. Scot

Recommended Posts

Just now, stbugs said:

Not sure why any Panthers fans would be happy about this. First game, @Arizona Cardinals. I don't like making one of our key opponents' schedules way easier. We'll be fighting them for home field/first round bye/making playoffs (if Seattle wins division) and I know with Brady that would be a much harder game to win. Without Brady in Arizona and it is an easy win.

I don't understand why people would root for cheaters, just so that our competition may, or may not lose a game. 

Panthers either handle their business, or they don't deserve it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, stbugs said:

Not sure why any Panthers fans would be happy about this. First game, @Arizona Cardinals. I don't like making one of our key opponents' schedules way easier. We'll be fighting them for home field/first round bye/making playoffs (if Seattle wins division) and I know with Brady that would be a much harder game to win. Without Brady in Arizona and it is an easy win.

I don't care what other teams do.

We win when we're supposed to, the rest takes care of itself. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, joemac said:

So is that it then?? Have all possible appeals and whatever else been exhausted? This poo is beyond old. Just take the 4 games and STFU already!

Brady is upset about how this will tarnish his legacy.

(I'm sure in his mind, nobody thinks of him as a cheater already)

He can appeal to the Supreme Court, but speculation is they won't hear the case.

(they do kind of have more important things to do)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, minicho said:

Am I the only one that thinks brady isn't guilty..? Plus it's not like it affected the game at all. 

At this point it not about guilt, as Mr. Scot said, it's about legacy. It's two years later...Who fycking cares about 2 seasons ago? He knows Eli already knocked him out of taking over Montana as the greastest Superbowl QB ever, so he's just saving face at this point. But he doesn't seem to realize he just looks petty.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, stbugs said:

Not sure why any Panthers fans would be happy about this. First game, @Arizona Cardinals. I don't like making one of our key opponents' schedules way easier. We'll be fighting them for home field/first round bye/making playoffs (if Seattle wins division) and I know with Brady that would be a much harder game to win. Without Brady in Arizona and it is an easy win.

I think that the game against Arizona is not as big as you fear. This is about the Patriots cheating and finally getting caught and having consequences. There is a long history of the Patriots trying hard to bend and even break the rules for their benefit. And most football fans, Panthers fans  included are happy they finally had to pay.

As for the Arizona record, I would worry more about the game we play against them heads up  this season more than how they do against anyone else. There is a good chance they don't even beat Seattle for the division let alone have a better record than us overall.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • looks like I was wrong on that going off memory.  It was one of a couple stats I looked at the other week.  Looks like I confused that league worst with the bad target %, yac per comp, etc stats I looked up.  Where he was league worst.  I still think solving the YAC and short pass game is the best way to maximize Bryce.  He might of thrown deep a lot.....but he has never been a good deep thrower.  Outside of PFF declaring it with what ifs. 
    • If those are T-Mac's first 2 seasons, then yes, our fans will be calling him a bust for sure.  But raw stats after the fact don't tell the full story, it all depends how they happen.   And to everyone who keeps saying he needs to get to 1,000 yard as a rookie because that's what elite rookie WRs do now, they keep just looking at things in a vacuum and not the full picture.  Usually the rookies who get to that mark are the only legitimate option in the passing attack for those teams. Anyone trying to point to guys like Nabers or BTJ last year are completely missing the point, T-Mac is not in remotely close to the same situation and is far more similar to MHJ and Odunze last year. The Giants 2nd and 3rd WRs last year were Wan'Dale Robinson and Slayton who had 699 and 573 yards, their 4th leading WR had a grand total of 62 yards in 16 games (their 3rd-7th leading rec yards were TE's and RBs). The Jags 2nd and 3rd WRs last year were Parker Washington and Kirk with 390 and 379 yards, while their 4th WR was Gabe Davis with 239 (while their 2nd leading rec yards was a TE with 411). The Cardinals had McBride with 111 catches for 1,146 yards The Bears had Moore with 98 for 966 and Allen with 70 for 744 Thielen, XL, Coker are absurdly better than the other WR options the Giants and Jags had last year, there is a real argument to make that our 4th best WR was better than those team's 2nd best.   That alone is a huge hurdle to T-Mac getting to the 1,000 yard mark as a rookie, no matter how ready he may or may not be.  MHJ was supposed to be the most pro-ready WR prospect in a LONG time and having McBride there was the main reason he finished with "only" 885 yards as a rookie.
    • They are going to throw everything and the kitchen sink at us, refs probably help them out as well. Can we steal it, I hope so. 
×
×
  • Create New...