Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers tight end conundrum....


Jeremy Igo

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, nctarheel0619 said:

Has Dickson been worth a damn or no?  

 

1 minute ago, Cracka McNasty said:

This is a good problem to have.

And is Dickson really that safe? I haven't heard anything about him this camp. Is it possible they cut Dickson, Keep simmonson and either Beau or Deaver?

Dickson is having a really nice camp thus far, from what I've seen.  Made some really nice catches.  You don't hear a whole lot about the established guys in camp reports.  Kind of how we haven't really heard much about Olsen, Kalil, TD, etc.  Most of the focus is on the new/bubble guys.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

do you think Deaver is actually doing slightly better than Sandland? i mean if Deaver is on totally equal footing with a draft pick and we have to think a healthy draft pick gets maybe at least one extra point in their favor, doesn't that have to mean Deaver is doing something a little bit better? or is Sandland's status as like the 2nd to last pick of the entire draft making him basically a UDFA in the front office's mind?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Ship said:

do you think Deaver is actually doing slightly better than Sandland? i mean if Deaver is on totally equal footing with a draft pick and we have to think a healthy draft pick gets maybe at least one extra point in their favor, doesn't that have to mean Deaver is doing something a little bit better? or is Sandland's status as like the 2nd to last pick of the entire draft making him basically a UDFA in the front office's mind?

I haven't been there every day, like Jeremy, but when I have been there, Deaver has been equally as good as Sandland.  They have both impressed me.  

Simonson is a damn good pass catcher.  I picked that up very early last season.  His blocking then wasn't too good though.  This year, he's picked it up quite a bit.  You really can't help but notice him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, top dawg said:

Won't have to sneak, huh? I'm sure more than a few FO's have a roving eye, if one not just affixed to what we're doing. Belichick is omnipresent.

It is doubtful that teams will be coveting the next to last pick in the draft and a UDFA enough to cut one of their own players. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'll reserve saying "we have too many good, young prospects!" until I see them perform like great players on the field.

 

We've had the same "conundrum" at WR during TC the last few years until we get to the season to realize all we had was a bunch of 4's competing for the 5th spot.

 

Until one of them separates himself during a game, you have to go with the one with the most upside and not Charly Martin the rest.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I would say that he's pulling things out of his ass to get people to visit his site.
    • Yep. I was hoping for and calling for a day three guy. But I didn’t research the position to say if we should or should‘t have jumped at a particular guy at a particular spot.    And everything I read said it was a poor draft for RBs depth wise. I guess when Seattle takes a backup RB in the 1st, that kind of backs that up.    I definitely think we should keep 4 running backs and if King can play well enough then keep him too.    I believe I heard Canales say we are a running team (talking about drafting a WR he will be needing to block as well as catch). Well if we are gonna be a running team by identity we don’t need to stock the WR room to overflowing. If one room has to sacrifice, it should not be the RB room given our circumstances. 
    • If there's a pattern I'm definitely picking up from Dan and company is a philosophy of making trades where we try not to sacrifice the number of draft picks we have by day's end. In other words, we're not giving up three picks for one, or giving up a future pick to make a pick today. And even if we give up something at the start, we make trades later to make up for that initial loss. Here's how it stacked up for 2026: How we started: 19, 51, 83, 119, 158, 159, 200 How we ended: 19, 49, 83, 129, 144, 151, 227 (no future picks sacrificed) Ultimately, we moved up two spots in the second to ensure we got someone we coveted, gave up a few spots for our fourth round pick, but then had better picks in the 5th (and got really good value out of them), and had a worse 7th rounder which isn't that big of a loss anyways.  At this point, we can question who they draft, but they're pretty good maneuvering across the draft board.
×
×
  • Create New...