Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

KK still in negotiations


Crazydounut

Recommended Posts

Just now, mjligon said:

KK and Josh Norman are completely different people. Josh Norman is a diva who had a retarded agent.

He's shown that now moreso than ever.

Oh so the Panthers are amazing and smart guys will definitely do whatever it takes to stay here

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, Crazydounut said:

If there was one thing I didn't like about letting Josh go. This was definetly it, KK has all the cards in negotiations currently. We might have to give him the 17 million per that he is asking for

Except that we spent a first round pick on a DT,and we have Starr.  As good as KK is, if the rookie shows something this year, we will still be ok without KK.  We wouldn't have to break the bank for him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Growl said:

lol Josh was in the same situation. Tagging a player isn't a magic bean which absolves you from having to pay big money. Tagging a player, especially at a high dollar position like DT, not once, but twice doesn't benefit the team and Kawann and his agent know it, especially after we made a circus about wanting to avoid just such a situation just a few months ago.

Re-read my post, then read yours and see how dumb you sound.

Playing KK this year and tagging him for the next two would put him here for 3 years, in his prime, for just over 30M total in guaranteed dollars.

Cox just got 63M guaranteed.  Exactly how, exactly, does that not benefit the team?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, mjligon said:

I know it's hard for you to accept that, but yes, the Panthers are a great organization and players WANT to play here.

Troll on.

at least we've gotten past the crap and you feigning any knowledge about any matter brought up within the confines of this thread and gotten down to what the driving force and very foundation of your argument is

 

Only a stupid player wouldn't want play for my favorite team!!! Short is an idiot if he doesn't see that he's got no leverage when going up against the Getties! #gettles #gettlefather 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Kevin Greene said:

I would, it would completely hamper offseason moves. Think Julius Peppers debacle (twice).

It's his right.  He "wouldn't be under contract" and I see no reason for him to come into TC as a vet if the tag is waiting on him.

I want KK resigned, and at a "good" price, please don't let this thread fool anyone....however to say that KK has the leverage is just flat wrong.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, Crazydounut said:

If there was one thing I didn't like about letting Josh go. This was definetly it, KK has all the cards in negotiations currently. We might have to give him the 17 million per that he is asking for

You are assuming that Gettleman will flinch with KK after cutting Steve Smith, basically forcing Jordan Gross' retirement, telling Josh Norman to go fug himself, and virtually giving every free agent he has signed a "take it or leave it" type of contract? Not happening.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, thefuzz said:

It's his right.  He "wouldn't be under contract" and I see no reason for him to come into TC as a vet if the tag is waiting on him.

I want KK resigned, and at a "good" price, please don't let this thread fool anyone....however to say that KK has the leverage is just flat wrong.

Same as JNO, was his right not to sign. If he doesn't sign in a timely fashion, he's probably shown the door like 24 was by Gettleman. We simply can't have 16 million in Cap Space in limbo.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Kevin Greene said:

Same as JNO, was his right not to sign. If he doesn't sign in a timely fashion, he's probably shown the door like 24 was by Gettleman. We simply can't have 16 million in Cap Space in limbo.

Disagree, but we will see.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, thefuzz said:

Re-read my post, then read yours and see how dumb you sound.

Playing KK this year and tagging him for the next two would put him here for 3 years, in his prime, for just over 30M total in guaranteed dollars.

Cox just got 63M guaranteed.  Exactly how, exactly, does that not benefit the team?

 

lol we were exact same scenario with Josh. The exact same. We were getting him in his prime on a massive one year rental and we didn't want it. You're suggesting we've completely doubled back on that philosophy and making a number of unlikely assumptions about KK himself in the scenario which all seem to conveniently benefit the Panthers regardless of how unlikely they may be.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The bottom line is we saw long stretches this season where T-Mac wasn't even targeted.  He had games where he went an entire half without seeing a pass thrown his way, and it lead to a bunch of games with 5 or less targets.  If he's healthy and we're not up a stupid amount and only running the ball, I can't see him having more than a game or two next year with 5 or less targets. We were also only 22nd this year in pass attempts, and that was with a rookie #1 and no legitimate 2nd option for half the season.  And even then, we were only 46 pass attempts above 31st place. If we go into next season with T-Mac improved in his 2nd season and a healthy Coker for 17 games, there is absolutely no reason for us to not throw it more.  That right away increases both of their target totals without sacrificing any targets from each other or other players, add in them taking targets from the TEs and RBs on top of that, and your argument just doesn't hold water anymore. You can't look at targets/yards in a vacuum and think next year Coker just takes some from T-Mac.  You have to look at the team as a whole and our situations this year and then project what will happen next year. If he's healthy for 17 games, I'd bet my life savings that T-Mac sees increases across the board, targets/catches/yards/TDs.   Just as Coker will also see career highs in all categories, it's not one vs the other, it's shifting offensive strategy given our personnel, which next year will be much better for our passing game (QB issues aside).
    • C'mon now.... First, you can't switch up your argument once someone points out a major flaw in your point. You're saying we shouldn't expect a big increase in targets/yards for T-Mac, but then shift to talking about averages with Chase when I point out the significant leap he took there once you factor in his missing games.  He saw an increase in targets in 5 less games, averages aside, he saw a significant increase in targets in his 2nd season, what he then did with those targets is actually irrelevant in this discussion. Puka seeing no increase is pointless, as he saw such an absurd amount of targets for a rookie, it's near impossible to see an increase. But the real issue in this post is that you think I'm proving your point by showing how Waddle had to share targets with Hill. Tyreek Hill was a 1st team All Pro who was 2nd in the NFL in yards that season. If you think Jaylen Waddle sharing targets with a 1st team All Pro and a future HOFer is even remotely in the same category as T-Mac needing to share targets with Coker... then you are certifiably insane, lol. If anything, you could make the argument that Coker is to Waddle as T-Mac is to Hill in that discussion (which would then lead to a serious increase in targets/yards for T-Mac).  But even that is insane, as neither T-Mac or Coker will be as good as Hill and Waddle respectively that season.  I love both of their potential, but c'mon now, T-Mac isn't getting 119 catches for 1,700 yards and Coker isn't getting 117 for 1,350 next season.
×
×
  • Create New...