Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

When's the next game Jonathan Stewart Will Have Over 100 Yards Rushing?


beastson

Recommended Posts

Probably the next game he gets enough carries to reach 100yds. We had a streak of over 30 games with a hundred yards rushing. Stewy only had a couple 100yd games during that stretch.

 

We don't run the normal running game. We can be successful without having to have a 100yd rusher.

 

You gotta love it. Start a thread just so you can bash a player. Fans, you gots to love em.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, iamhubby1 said:

Probably the next game he gets enough carries to reach 100yds. We had a streak of over 30 games with a hundred yards rushing. Stewy only had a couple 100yd games during that stretch.

 

We don't run the normal running game. We can be successful without having to have a 100yd rusher.

 

You gotta love it. Start a thread just so you can bash a player. Fans, you gots to love em.

And that's a problem. Cam is our rushing game and its not sustainable especially for his health. You completely missed the point because it definitely wasn't a bash Stew thread

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, beastson said:

And that's a problem. Cam is our rushing game and its not sustainable especially for his health. You completely missed the point because it definitely wasn't a bash Stew thread

 

See, I don't get this "Cam is our running game" line? He may have games where he is our leading rusher, but those games are rare. Especially when Stewy plays. For this statement to have any meaning, Cam would have to lead us in rushing for the entire year. And that has not happened yet.

 

Start with a thread Topic of; When will Stewy run for 100yds again? Then use a 1 sentence post to say it won't happen. Not sure how I can be faulted for thinking it was a bash Stewy thread. 

 

Maybe if you had taken a few minutes to add some context, I could go along with you not bashing Stewy. But with how little effort you put into it?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, iamhubby1 said:

 

See, I don't get this "Cam is our running game" line? He may have games where he is our leading rusher, but those games are rare. Especially when Stewy plays. For this statement to have any meaning, Cam would have to lead us in rushing for the entire year. And that has not happened yet.

 

Start with a thread Topic of; When will Stewy run for 100yds again? Then use a 1 sentence post to say it won't happen. Not sure how I can be faulted for thinking it was a bash Stewy thread. 

 

Maybe if you had taken a few minutes to add some context, I could go along with you not bashing Stewy. But with how little effort you put into it?

I asked a simple question, I really could careless how you interpreted it

Far as the fast paragraph, Cam hasn't had the most attempts to be the leading rusher for a year but if he did he would be. He also has the most rushing TD's like 4 seasons straight now

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, beastson said:

I asked a simple question, I really could careless how you interpreted it

Far as the fast paragraph, Cam hasn't had the most attempts to be the leading rusher for a year but if he did he would be. He also has the most rushing TD's like 4 seasons straight now

Thats because when Cams runs the ball offense has advantage with a extra blocker btw if the coaches would have called the plays for Stew he would have converted 70% of those plays for TD.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • They said there wasn't clear evidence to warrant the overturn.  How would it have made a difference at that point in the game?   https://www.nbcsports.com/nfl/profootballtalk/rumor-mill/news/nfl-privately-admitted-to-erroneous-reversal-of-catch-by-panthers
    • Me, I'm sick of WWE channel hopping their PLEs and shows. Netflix now with Raw. USA still has Smackdown but you can't get it with Roku if you don't also have cable. Then they went from all the PLEs on Peacock to ESPN+ which required upgrading your Disney+ package. Then they frikkin' move Saturday Night Main Event with John Cena's retirement match back over to frikkin' Peacock, which we'd just cancelled two months prior because no PLEs there anymore. And there are fewer, but longer matches and its the same danged stories again and again. Rematch after rematch after rematch between PLEs. Fewer matches, fewer wrestlers, more promos (of lesser quality) and less action.  It just seems like it's all fillers and re-runs. I'm tired of Cody Rhodes. I'm tired of Jey Uso. I'm tired of the two Brons. Shuffle the deck a bit guys, this game's getting stale.
    • Chuba was 3 yards behind the 3 gap. He was lined up weak offset I. It was a 33 dive. Chuba needed to power through off of Ekwonu's block and slip off into the 5 gap where the Tremble had the lane sealed and Rick pulled the LB out of the 5 gap. Here's a visual if you need proof. Chuba did a jump cut laterally to the 2 gap on the right side with unblocked defenders crashing down and went airborne.   This is a 33 dive that should have been slipped off the block into the 5 gap. Chuba lacked vision, but you can see Rico and Bryce staring at the intended running lane sealed off by Tremble and Ekwonu. He should have read Ekwonu's block. The blocking and misdirection is NOT set up for the right side. The play worked. Chuba failed to execute on this play. Trust who you want to, but I wouldn't suggest you argue with the video. Anyone telling you this was drawn up to go right with the blocking did not analyze it. They are correct it should have been a called dive, and it was a called dive.  This was a weak offset I bringing Tremble in motion from the right to the left.
×
×
  • Create New...