Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Short thinking of wins. Contract on the back burner...


top dawg

Recommended Posts

According to David Newton, Kawann "Short (is) more concerned with wins than sacks or long-term deal."  According to Short he's "playing good," while Ron Rivera referred to Short's play as "solid."

It really is hard to argue that Short's play hasn't been solid, but of course the real question is whether his play this season supports his demand for a top contract at his position. He knows that he needs to "correct" some things, and that he will "get to it," and he'll let all the contract stuff take care of itself.  He sounds like he expects it all to fall into place once his play improves, but we'll see if that turns out to be the reality.

One thing that has been a question here, is whether Short is really being double-teamed as much as some would have us believe. Rivera basically says that Short is absolutely being doubled, and that it's not just him.

Quote

 

“It’s hard." Rivera said. “One of the things, if you watch the tape, is how many times he does get doubled, how many teams are protecting. That back, when he goes through the middle, he’s looking for KK and chipping him on the way out, too.

“It’s not like he’s getting the free runs like he had last year. That’s the hard part. People are keeping those tight ends in, so they’re doubling both of the DTs. We’ve been approached a little differently this year."

 

So, perhaps it's not as cut-and-dried as many people believe about Short, sacks, or the rest of the line.  Perhaps untrained eyes are missing something (or not).  Be that as it may, Short still sounds like he's got dollar signs on his mind to me.

Quote

“I’m confident in myself,’’ Short said. “It’s not really putting nobody to shame. But at the same time, if you know your worth, then you know what’s up."

I guess we'll see what's up beginning with the Cardinals.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

KK's play has been solid, and he'll get his mega deal in the offseason. Since Rivera and Cam have arrived, the team has always had long winning streaks during the season. We need to start a streak now, and KK is going to have to be a major force if we're to go on one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Jeremy Igo said:

 


It has?

 

 

10 minutes ago, Kakarot said:

To my naked eye it has. Stats could prove me wrong, tho. *shrugs*

Its not what it was last year but a lot of this bashing on KK seems like your trying hard to justify the Butler pick. We seen about 30 million double team treads I know you can find atleast 1 good play by KK. 

Its not like Luke , TD, & Shaq have been perfroming to last year but I dont see any threads about underperformance by Shaq but we all know everyone has their favitorite players.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In my opinion, it all depends upon one's definition of "solid." One thing I will say though is that some of you are acting like he has been "trash," but to me he has been OK, just not the dominant force he was last season. Of course that means I wouldn't pay him anywhere close to what he wants, but "it is what it is." Getty will make that determination.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, mc52beast said:

Regardless of what kind of season KK has, someone is going to pay him top dollar... thats just how the NFL works

If it's going to be the Panthers, he absolutely needs to step it up. Otherwise we had all better hope that Big Vern flashes this second half of the season. 

On an off note, I can just see a grinning Dave on the first night of the draft talking about our newly acquired DT after passing on a quality DE (but I'm just admittedly being somewhat facetious). 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The bottom line is we saw long stretches this season where T-Mac wasn't even targeted.  He had games where he went an entire half without seeing a pass thrown his way, and it lead to a bunch of games with 5 or less targets.  If he's healthy and we're not up a stupid amount and only running the ball, I can't see him having more than a game or two next year with 5 or less targets. We were also only 22nd this year in pass attempts, and that was with a rookie #1 and no legitimate 2nd option for half the season.  And even then, we were only 46 pass attempts above 31st place. If we go into next season with T-Mac improved in his 2nd season and a healthy Coker for 17 games, there is absolutely no reason for us to not throw it more.  That right away increases both of their target totals without sacrificing any targets from each other or other players, add in them taking targets from the TEs and RBs on top of that, and your argument just doesn't hold water anymore. You can't look at targets/yards in a vacuum and think next year Coker just takes some from T-Mac.  You have to look at the team as a whole and our situations this year and then project what will happen next year. If he's healthy for 17 games, I'd bet my life savings that T-Mac sees increases across the board, targets/catches/yards/TDs.   Just as Coker will also see career highs in all categories, it's not one vs the other, it's shifting offensive strategy given our personnel, which next year will be much better for our passing game (QB issues aside).
    • C'mon now.... First, you can't switch up your argument once someone points out a major flaw in your point. You're saying we shouldn't expect a big increase in targets/yards for T-Mac, but then shift to talking about averages with Chase when I point out the significant leap he took there once you factor in his missing games.  He saw an increase in targets in 5 less games, averages aside, he saw a significant increase in targets in his 2nd season, what he then did with those targets is actually irrelevant in this discussion. Puka seeing no increase is pointless, as he saw such an absurd amount of targets for a rookie, it's near impossible to see an increase. But the real issue in this post is that you think I'm proving your point by showing how Waddle had to share targets with Hill. Tyreek Hill was a 1st team All Pro who was 2nd in the NFL in yards that season. If you think Jaylen Waddle sharing targets with a 1st team All Pro and a future HOFer is even remotely in the same category as T-Mac needing to share targets with Coker... then you are certifiably insane, lol. If anything, you could make the argument that Coker is to Waddle as T-Mac is to Hill in that discussion (which would then lead to a serious increase in targets/yards for T-Mac).  But even that is insane, as neither T-Mac or Coker will be as good as Hill and Waddle respectively that season.  I love both of their potential, but c'mon now, T-Mac isn't getting 119 catches for 1,700 yards and Coker isn't getting 117 for 1,350 next season.
×
×
  • Create New...