Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

NBC blasts NFL for Rams going to Cam's head


CPantherKing

Recommended Posts

Dungy and Harrison made it known nationally that the Rams went to Cam's head with forcible hits and the officials failed to call unnecessary roughness.

They once again made it known the NFL needs to do something about it.

It happened twice with the Barron hit and the Donald hit. Both defenders left their feet. Both players should receive fines this week.

Barron hit. NBCs angle showed it definitively.

 

 

 

 

 

The NFL must make them pay and rack up 2 more missed calls. This has to stop. They could go for the body, but they launch for the head. Cam Newton is 6'5". It takes effort to hit him in the head.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just to mention, Dungy, Harrison and Faulk calling the NFL out will do nothing. Cam has called them out and it did nothing. Sure Ron said they've talked to Goodell about these hits, but call them out publicly on it. Make this a deal until it's resolved. Don't sit back, fold your arms and go on the good word. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I may disagree completely with your views on Gettleman, but when it comes to hits and the poor referees, there's no doubt that it's atrocious.

Those two big sacks were BOTH helmet to helmets. You'd have to be blind to not notice it. I was completely shocked to see the Fox crew completely treat it like nothing.

Something needs to happen. And not a pat on the back and "it'll be okay"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Rico walking is no big deal. I'll take a healthy 2024 Hubbard over Rico any time and losing Mays is, again, no a big deal.  Young is signed for what, $35M for the next two years? Say he wants $50M but the FO doesn't. If they put the franchise tag on him, that would be around $55? So basically they are getting Young for the next 3 years for an average of $30M per year. Putting the franchise tag on him wouldn't be my first choice but it gives them an option that wouldn't be locking him into a long term, $50M contract. I'm not suggestion they do that. Just that the option will be there should they get to that point. Hunt is on a 5 year deal which is done in 28 so he either restructures or is gone anyway. Moton will be 35 by then and will either be gone or have diminished playing time. Neither of those players has anything to do with getting Young a contract. The O line is way overpaid anyway. Hopefully by the time they are gone, Freeling and Hecht will be developed and Ickey will be healthy. Young was benched his second year and only got his job back because Dalton was injured. Not sure how you can call that entitled. And I would NOT say putting a rookie QB on a team with no receivers, tight ends or O lineman and then being put with a coach who never wanted you and is fired mid season, is a definition of luck. As far as competition, no team is going to bring in competition for a QB picked first overall - especially given the capital that was given up to get him.  
    • With apologies to Lady Cowboy fan, any day we can screw over the Cowboys is a GOOD day…
    • Been here since 2014ish. Good times. Its a shame Zod wont sell, it wouldnt take that much effort to get this place back into shape.
×
×
  • Create New...