Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

WFNZ Host Goes Full Tard On Igo


L-TownCat

Recommended Posts

Nathan Conely has been taking shots at our fearless leader since late last nigh.  Jerms has not gone quietly.  The main reason I bring this to the huddle main forum is that Nate has essentially gone out of his way to insult the huddle as a whole and quite frankly that's a no-no.

if you have a Twitter account let FNZ know that we are a large and well versed group, not to be taken lightly.  Do what the Huddle does and flex on this arrogant little sleaze ball.

but first make sure to read all the tweets first, don't go blindly attacking the guy.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Jase said:

I mean, they literally called the show "the call-up" with the hopes of coaxing people to call in, and they average about three phone calls per hour.

I always thought it was because they promoted back studio guys to host. 

 

I've grown to like qcb. He's about the most reasonable on that station.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Jase said:

this is what he wants us to do.

In reality he hosts a show called "the call-up" in which no one listens or even bothers to call up most of the time.

He thinks that's what he wants us to do.  I've seen the Huddle stand up for themselves and it's absolutely beautiful.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • lol, that second part is quite literally one of the dumbest things ever. Having or not having guaranteed contracts has absolutely nothing to do with how much these billionaires have to pay.  Because there is a hard cap and a minimum cap spend requirement, and teams either use their cap or roll it over to use it all the next year, so the owners have to pay the same amount of money in the end no matter what. Having fully guaranteed contracts in the NFL would only hurt salary cap management, and thus would end up screwing over the team and its fan base when teams kiss on signings as they take up cap room that is needed to improve the roster. Look at the Browns with Watson, they gave him the fully guaranteed deal and all it’s doing is sucking up massive cap space now.  If they hadn’t done that, the owner would still be paying the same amount of money each year as that cap space would still be used elsewhere. If you want to argue for fully guaranteed contracts because the players deserve it, that’s an entirely different argument and a fair one to discuss.  But anyone against fully guaranteed deals isn’t doing it to argue for the billionaire owners.
    • Start posting in threads in the other forums instead of just creating threads. No one comes over here so you aren't starting conversations.  Get your ass up to 100 posts. It's not that hard. Don't create 100 posts. Contribute to conversations. 
    • Ryabkin could be the steal of the draft, he was a Top 10 pick heading into last season and had a rough year.  Lots of GMs passed on him because of that and his workouts. Pick has really high upside and Svech should be able to translate Rod tearing his arse a new one for making dumb plays since Svech has had several years of it.  🤣😂
×
×
  • Create New...