Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Poll: Grade the Offensive Play Calling


Jeremy Igo

Offensive Play Calling  

136 members have voted

  1. 1. How would you grade the offensive play calling last night?

    • A
      1
    • B
      6
    • C
      23
    • D
      58
    • F
      48


Recommended Posts

15 hours ago, teeray said:

Short passing game?  With 8 or nine people in the box?  If 8 or 9 people are in the box where are all the defenders?  Right where you want your short passing game to be.

Not to mention that doesn't play to Cam Newton's strengths as a down field 10+ yard passer.  Cam is actually less accurate on short passes than intermediate passes 

So you want to design an offense that works against your QB's strengths and throwing the ball where the defense is rather than where it isn't.

Our receivers also seem to drop those short passes. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 11/19/2016 at 10:32 PM, teeray said:

Short passing game?  With 8 or nine people in the box?  If 8 or 9 people are in the box where are all the defenders?  Right where you want your short passing game to be.

Not to mention that doesn't play to Cam Newton's strengths as a down field 10+ yard passer.  Cam is actually less accurate on short passes than intermediate passes 

So you want to design an offense that works against your QB's strengths and throwing the ball where the defense is rather than where it isn't.

 

if they are stacking the box the outside is gonna be open for quick passes to the flat, quick hitches, screens, pick plays etc. Obviously I am not talking about trying to run the scheme in jumbo formation. Gotta come out with spread formations, trips, etc. 

Just LOL at the excuse or notion that Cam can't be effective on a quick short passing game. 

I want to design an offense that is gonna keep the chains moving and score points. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 11/19/2016 at 3:53 PM, PrimeTimeHeel said:

Can someone with Coaches Film please go and do an analysis of our offensive scheme / playcalling. 

1) Are we running the ball like a dumbass against a stacked box? How often? Likewise are we spreading them out and running on light boxes? How often?

2) On passing plays do we have level concepts on every play ie short, medium, and deep routes? How often?

3) On what % of passing plays do we have a check down? 

4) Is Cam making his reads from short to deep or deep to short?

5) How many times does that cost us in a sack or incomplete when we could have had positive yards or even a 1st down?

6) Are our passing plays effective against man and zone? Or are they low % against both man and zone ie go routes

7) How long is Cam holding on to the ball? Is he making progressions within the 3-4 second window that he ought to be? 

8) What D did the Saints play most of the game ie man or zone? Where they covering short or giving that up? Did we attack their weakness on following plays going off tendencies? 

 

 

bmp

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, PantherBuckeye89 said:

That is because Cam lasers them in like he is throwing a hail mary. He can't help it, that's how strong his arm is lol

He's supposed to laser them in, this isn't a game a catch. Either way Funchess, Philly, Ginn, Kelvin, Dickson have all had issues with drops before Cam.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • We’re in a pickle. My best hope is we protect him and can run the ball vs most Ds and the WRs are healthy so he has every chance to not look like what he looked like in too many games last year.   
    • I'm really not stressing about upgrading from Bryce. I'm frustrated with our inability (or refusal) to recognize overall bad QB performance and failure to seriously address the issue. QB is the most impactful position on the field, and we're not only settling for what we've been given to this point, but we've rewarded it with a fully guaranteed 5th year extension for a player that's never played 2 NFL franchise QB quality games back to back in 3 seasons. I can't understand how that's ok from a coach's or GM's viewpoint. Successful franchises don't do things like this. It just doesn't make sense.  We do not have a top half of the league QB right now. Since we don't have that player, we should be looking for him. Pickett isn't it. Grier isn't it. Bryce hasn't proven he is yet. Until you have that sure fire franchise QB, you keep looking. You're not consistently making the playoffs, a deep run, or a SB appearance without one.  What's the worst that could happen? We end up with 2 potential number 1 QBs? How horrible. 
    • Easy to understand Pickett, if this is anywhere close to on point. Canales wants to get as close to Bryce as he can- get the pace and timing in the throws as close a he can to Bryce. So the other players don’t have to adjust so much, to a new guy.       If Cam was the 1, he would look for a rocket arm.  But Bryce is the 1. Look for limited in the same way.  Low velocity, plenty of air under it, feels just like home when Picket comes in. And you have the guys on the second team not having such a radical adjustment (if they have to play) like with Dalton to Bryce.    Enter Grier. I guess we will collect those types.   
×
×
  • Create New...