Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers - Seahawks could be flexed


Jeremy Igo

Recommended Posts

15 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

I'll let you know as soon as your opinion matters.

Your lack of football insight is laughable. But then that should be expected from somebody who "only comes here to troll positive people" anyway (and whines and cries when they get trolled back).

HAHA, way to detract away from your dumb ass statement yourself.  "Football Historian" looks like I got under your skin again.  My work here is done.  Carry on "Football Historian."  I'll give you a call when I need to know more about "good" offensive lineman like Mike Remmers.  

KbiG5xl.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, nctarheel0619 said:

HAHA, way to detract away from your dumb ass statement yourself.  "Football Historian" looks like I got under your skin again.  My work here is done.  Carry on "Football Historian."  I'll give you a call when I need to know more about "good" offensive lineman like Mike Remmers. 

Under my skin?  Nah. Knowing what you're like, I'm sure you wish you could.  And I've already shown I can get under yours :)

But here's your problem on that front: I only worry about the opinions of people I respect.  You don't qualify, dude.  And especially not when it comes to football opinions.

I doubt you've ever even watched Doug Free or heard of him prior to googling who the Cowboys right tackle was.  For the record, the Cowboys weren't all that high on him before and at one point considered letting him go.  Right now he's benefiting a lot from talent around him, but he's still far from anything special.

And that's the thing.  Outside of googling names, your football analysis pretty much never goes any deeper than "this guy sucks", "that guy sucks", "everybody we have sucks and everybody on every other team is perfect".  You don't know jack about blocking schemes, offensive systems, defensive alignments or much else.  The people who do understand those things are the people whose opinions matter to me.

Talking to someone whose knowledge is that weak doesn't exactly make for challenging, stimulating football discussion (jerking your chain, maybe, but that gets boring after a while too).  You trying to look like a big deal by criticizing everybody else is your thing, and frankly it's kinda dull. 

Sooooo no, I'm not worried about your opinion.

Feel free to try and come up with a witty comeback that'll fall flat. I'm sure that's easier than actually learning about the game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Under my skin?  Nah. Knowing what you're like, I'm sure you wish you could.  And I've already shown I can get under yours :)

But here's your problem on that front: I only worry about the opinions of people I respect.  You don't qualify, dude.  And especially not when it comes to football opinions.

I doubt you've ever even watched Doug Free or heard of him prior to googling who the Cowboys right tackle was.  For the record, the Cowboys weren't all that high on him before and at one point considered letting him go.  Right now he's benefiting a lot from talent around him, but he's still far from anything special.

And that's the thing.  Outside of googling names, your football analysis pretty much never goes any deeper than "this guy sucks", "that guy sucks", "everybody we have sucks and everybody on every other team is perfect".  You don't know jack about blocking schemes, offensive systems, defensive alignments or much else.  The people who do understand those things are the people whose opinions matter to me.

Talking to someone whose knowledge is that weak doesn't exactly make for challenging, stimulating football discussion (jerking your chain, maybe, but that gets boring after a while too).  You trying to look like a big deal by criticizing everybody else is your thing, and frankly it's kinda dull. 

Sooooo no, I'm not worried about your opinion.

Feel free to try and come up with a witty comeback that'll fall flat. I'm sure that's easier than actually learning about the game.

Holy God, what a novel.  

So, anyway "football historian", you're just another Huddle Slap Dick fan.  Just please, for the sake of everyone, stop acting like you're more knowledgeable then everyone else on here.  You're just another fan acting like they know more then everyone else about football.  1GJ0M09.jpg

Anyway, enjoy the rest of your day "football historian."  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, nctarheel0619 said:

Holy God, what a novel.  

So, anyway "football historian", you're just another Huddle Slap Dick fan.  Just please, for the sake of everyone, stop acting like you're more knowledgeable then everyone else on here.  You're just another fan acting like they know more then everyone else about football. 

More knowledgeable than everyone else?  Nah,

More knowledgeable than you?  Pretty much.

And thanks for proving my point with the deep response.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Its completely and utterly bootlicking at this point.  If you cannot acknowledge that using 3 picks on a rb with a torn acl in the 2nd round isnt a bad pick then you simply havent a clue about football.  Sorry man it is what it is.  And its insanely laughable you are trying to strawman this argument using other players.  And what fuging facts are you bringing that is justifing morgan using 3 goddamn picks on him?  I cannot wait to hear that.
    • Scourton's interviews are telling to me that it's only a matter of time before he could really put it together.  His limitation tool-wise that I see is in his bend, but at the leaner size, it looks like it wasn't a problem at Purdue.   He has a good moveset and reads leverages very well (vet level well).  Plays both the speed/quickness (great change of direction) and has a power game with good hand usage.  Moves from what I've seen in my digs: I'm seeing cross-chop, fake crossers into bull, bull rush, spin (his preferred move of choice), hand shuck.  He's not unrefined by any means.   If he can do 2 things---I'm feeling confident from seeing his interviews that we have a real dude on our hands: 1) Diversifying his moveset/how it's deployed - Over-reliant on some, but again, he has a growing palette.  And is already great with his hands so things are in-place to coach up. 2) Developing a counter moveset and starting to play the chess game with an OT - He's very good at reading leverage, knowing when to change things up during a play.  But NFL coaching should start to teach him how to really create a plan based on an opponent.  What to throw at a guy first, how to confuse with fakes/counters, etc.  How to play against these tackles as a game progresses.   Overall, he has some things that give me serious optimism: Run Defense, speed moves, power moves, he's super young and has the size/length.  When you really spell it all out, I think we should get excited.  Temper expectations from a stat sheet standpoint, but he should be able to go in and make an impact.    
×
×
  • Create New...