Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The answer to all of our problems


t96

Recommended Posts

Well, maybe not all of them but the biggest of them...

 

  1. Ryan Ramczyk, OT, Wisconsin

One of the biggest rises of the season, Ramczyk has stepped in as the starter at left tackle for Wisconsin and he’s been outstanding in pass protection while showing power in the run game. By all accounts, he’ll test well when the time comes, and those movement skills show up on the field. The sample size is small, but it’s been a great start for Ramczyk.

 

Quote

Player Overview

The same program that helped turn transfers J.J. Watt and Russell Wilson into future superstars appears to have another breakout NFL prospect in left tackle Ryan Ramczyk, a former Division-III player.

 

Unsure of what he wanted to do after high school, Ramczyk turned down an offer from then-Pitt coach Paul Chryst to play for the Panthers, instead opting to remain close to home and sign with D-II Winona State. Ramczyk never took a snap for the Warriors, however, instead opting to transfer first to Mid-State Technical College (which does not have a football team, or any varsity athletics program, for that matter) and then later to UW-Stevens Point, a D-III program.

 

After rediscovering his love of the game in two seasons with the Pointers, Ramczyk pursued a reunion with Chryst, who had since taken over at Wisconsin. Ramczyk had to sit out the 2014 season due to the transfer, but Chryst wasted little time this spring in naming the Wisconsin native his starting left tackle. Since, Ramczyk has rewarded his head coach's faith, standing out against LSU's athletic front in the season opener and not surrendering a single pressure or sack in the two games since. He continued his ascent with several key blocks in a route of Michigan State on Sept. 24.

Strengths Weaknesses

STRENGTHS: Shows terrific initial quickness when asked to block at the second level, firing out and making tough cut blocks at the second level appear routine. When the time comes to simply knock defenders off the ball, Ramczyk shows good power and pad level, as well, bowing his back and showing the leg drive to move the pile.

 

Given his relative inexperience, Ramczyk shows impressive balance, agility and patience in pass protection. He eases off the snap, sliding left with light feet and bent knees waiting for the defender to come to him. The coordination between his upper and lower body is impressive, as Ramczyk keeps his feet sliding while shooting his hands into the chest of opponents. From there, Ramczyk's long arms and strength typically take over, essentially ending the play for the defender.

 

Shows the poise that will earn him high marks from offensive line coaches as well as scouts, maintaining his technique with bent knees and using his trailing right arm to get a final, powerful shove on the rusher.

 

WEAKNESSES: Relatively inexperienced, as he did not take a snap at the FBS level until 2016, following transfers from a Division II program where he never played and then to a school close to his home that did not have a football program, so NFL teams will want to gauge his true passion for the game.

 

IN OUR VIEW: Ramczyk's greatest asset is pure athleticism, which makes his journey from D-III UW-Stevens Point to a potentially early-round NFL Draft pick for the Badgers all the more interesting.

 

http://www.cbssports.com/nfl/draft/players/2183938/ryan-ramczyk

 

Guy is gonna be a beast. I bet he could be had in the 2nd and even possible he drops to third but I wouldn't be that surprised if he goes in the 1st, and I'd be completely fine with us taking him kind of high, wherever we're at.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, stbugs said:

If he's rising, with the dearth of OTs, he likely won't make it to pick 40 unfortunately. That said, I am interested in having an early 2nd round pick. If you think about it, we picked 30th last year, so this year if the order stays where it is today, we will have 2 players by 10 picks later. The talent gap between the top 10 and 30 is pretty big, so it will be like having an extra stud from last year, and we have 2 extra picks (3rd round compensatory and Cleveland's 7th (which is basically last pick of the 6th).

I don't think he's rising to the first round (more like rising from complete nobody to day 2 pick) but who the hell knows. I didn't think Artie Burns would go before the middle of the 2nd this year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, thomas96 said:

I don't think he's rising to the first round (more like rising from complete nobody to day 2 pick) but who the hell knows. I didn't think Artie Burns would go before the middle of the 2nd this year.

True but Burns was in a pretty thin CB class. Eli Apple and Hargraves would be boarderline 1st rounders in this class.  King out of Iowa was bring projected the #2 corner in last class before deciding to come back.  His play has stayed the same but now is looking to be around the 5th CB off the baord this year. 

 

Ramczyk may not fall.  But with depth/talent at other positions.  The #3 OT very well could

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, stbugs said:

I've seen him in the 1st round in some mocks.

If McGlinchey declares, I could see him available in the 2nd, but he still might not make it to 39. If McGlincehy doesn't, I'd be shocked if he made it to our 2nd round pick.

Note that DG has shown a willingness to trade up in the 2nd, and we have a 3rd round comp pick for Josh most likely.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mcglinchey and Ramczyk would be solid first round picks.  We wont touch Cam Robinson with off the field issues.

 

If we decide to double up early on OTs, 2 guys who would be solid choices in the 3rd would be Taylor Moton and Dion Dawkins.  Both bigger athletic guys who would be solid RTs and could backup at OG much like Travelle Wharton did.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

He got a first round grade from the NFL Advisory Board.

There is some concern that he is going to have to have surgery on his labrum (or  possibly hip) which will keep him from attending the Combine and workouts. This could affect his draft stock to varying degrees.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I just read today that he had received a 1st round grade from the NFL Draft Advisory Board. I figured as much; he seemed a little too good to be true as a 2nd/3rd rounder.

So, could we trade down and still get him? Or maybe trade one of our 3rd rounders packaged with our 2nd to move back into the 1st to get him?

Landing Dalvin Cook and this guy in the 1st round would be outstanding, even if it costs us an extra pick to move up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 5 weeks later...

In  this class he'll be a top 20 pick. Would rather we don't take him at 8 but wouldn't be terribly upset with it if guys like Adams and Fournette are gone. I think he could be a franchise tackle but would struggle early on and it isn't a surefire pick. If he's there at 40 DG should have the pick in in less than a second. Have a feeling the Colts take him at 14 or 15.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Passer Rating Differential = Offensive Passer Rating  - Defensive Passer Rating    Offensive Passer Rating = how efficient your team’s QBs are. Defensive Passer Rating Allowed = how efficient opposing QBs are against your defense. The larger the positive differential, the more dominant your team’s passing game is relative to opponents’ passing success. Conversely, a negative differential means your defense is getting carved up or your offense isn’t efficient enough. Almost every Super Bowl champion from the 1970s to the present day finished near the top of the league in DPRD (Defensive Passer Rating Differential). https://coldhardfootballfacts.com/stats/passer-ratings-differential Look at where we are #16 and we have a Negative DPRD (-0.36). Every team above us has a a positive DPRD, is .500 or better, and still in running for a playoff spot.  Look at the chart. The best teams in the NFL have the highest DPRD. Only 2 teams below us with a negative DPRD are still in contention or the playoffs: #19 San Francisco (-4.44) and # 21 Tampa Bay(-6.62). And, Tampa has no shot if they fail to beat us down the stretch at least once. The teams with the highest negative DPRD always seem to be at the bottom of the standings. I didn't learn about this stat until 15 years ago. It's amazing how it always seems to accurately predict who will be in playoff contention year end and year out. 1 = Los Angeles Rams 111.76 85.23 26.53 2 3 Philadelphia Eagles 100.00 75.57 24.43 3 1 Seattle Seahawks 100.30 77.42 22.88 4 1 Buffalo Bills 104.20 82.66 21.54 5 1 Los Angeles Chargers 91.46 71.19 20.27 6 1 Houston Texans 90.70 72.40 18.30 7 1 Detroit Lions 110.41 94.40 16.01 8 1 New England Patriots 109.10 96.75 12.35 9 3 Green Bay Packers 102.95 92.09 10.86 10 1 Denver Broncos 89.21 78.78 10.43 11 1 Indianapolis Colts 95.12 85.91 9.21 12 = Pittsburgh Steelers 97.42 89.90 7.52 13 = Baltimore Ravens 93.87 86.91 6.96 14 2 Jacksonville Jaguars 88.07 81.23 6.84 15 4 Chicago Bears 89.48 88.70 0.78 16 2 Carolina Panthers 88.77 89.13 -0.36 17 2 Arizona Cardinals 93.49 95.79 -2.30 18 1 Kansas City Chiefs 88.85 92.46 -3.61 19 1 San Francisco 49ers 96.87 101.31 -4.44 20 1 Atlanta Falcons 87.50 92.50 -5.00 21 3 Tampa Bay Buccaneers 89.77 96.39 -6.62 22 = Dallas Cowboys 98.69 108.92 -10.23 23 = New York Giants 87.74 98.84 -11.10 24 1 New Orleans Saints 84.97 96.17 -11.20 25 1 Miami Dolphins 88.33 102.37 -14.04 26 3 Minnesota Vikings 75.03 90.31 -15.28 27 3 Las Vegas Raiders 83.50 99.14 -15.64 28 = Cincinnati Bengals 84.51 104.46 -19.95 29 2 Washington Commanders 87.24 107.74 -20.50 30 3 Cleveland Browns 70.46 91.41 -20.95 31 1 New York Jets 77.75 104.86 -27.11 32 = Tennessee Titans 76.27 106.03 -29.76  
    • Yeah and truthfully I’ll be ok with that as long as the talent and culture is building. 
    • We have been on the right side of one score games.  But like minny a few years ago and KC, we know that isnt sustainable and we probably will revert back to the nfl mean.  Which could mean a poo season incoming if this offense doesnt figure poo out
×
×
  • Create New...