Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Eagles likely to pursue DeSean Jackson in free agency


beastson

Recommended Posts

10 minutes ago, stbugs said:

Neither of those tackles are available and their teams have said so.

Sent from my iPhone using CarolinaHuddle

Hue Jackson and/or Chip Kelly may not even be around in 2017.  Obviously having both players has helped both teams SO much this year.  

Those teams have no choice but to think medium/long term they're so bad.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd be leery of signing Jackson.  If I signed him, it'd have to be a creative contract structure that reflected the injury risk. The guy is a constant fixture on the injury report.

2016 12 shoulder Questionable
2016 11 shoulder Questionable
2016 10 shoulder Doubtful
2016 8 hamstring, shoulder Questionable
2016 7 shoulder Questionable
2015 WC knee Probable
2015 17 knee Questionable
2015 16 foot, knee Probable
2015 15 knee Probable
2015 13 illness Probable
2015 9 hamstring Questionable
2015 7 hamstring Out
2015 6 hamstring Questionable
2015 5 hamstring Out
2015 4 hamstring Out
2015 3 hamstring Out
2015 2 hamstring Out
2015 1 strained left hamstring Day-to-Day
2014 15 shin Questionable
2014 14 shin Questionable
2014 5 shoulder Probable
2014 4 shoulder Questionable
2014 3 shoulder Questionable
2014 2 sprained left AC joint Day-to-Day
2013 9 ankle Probable
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yep he made the comment " I dont know what they were doing out there at that point" in the press conference. Let's be real they all got paid but they also know his system suppresses there offensive potential.
    • Yup the casuals on Facebook ive gotten 85 laughing or angry emojis so far for pointing it out.  The amount of them throwing a fit because the canes were booed is insane  
    • Why are you so fixated on yards? Even if yards were a good judge of QB play, his low yardage totals in some of those games were partly a function of drops (looking at you Xavier Leggette…).  I’m not advocating that Bryce was elite for the last half of last year, but the eye test certainly supported high level QB play for large stretches. He made a lot of high difficulty, put it on the money/drop in the bucket throws. He converted on 3rd and 4th down, kept drives moving, and put the team in position to win games. And it’s not on him that the defense blew it late after he led game tying drives, Leggette dropped a game winning TD, or Chuba fumbled the ball in OT. We could have finished the season close to .500 with wins against 3 playoff teams including KC and Philly during that stretch largely due to Bryce’s play.    Has he sustained this level of play long enough to deserve an higher ranking? No. But for judging based in that stretch alone, he would. But whether he can perform more consistently at that level or build on that, and thus earns a higher ranking, remains to be seen. 
×
×
  • Create New...