Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

For those who still want to make the Playoffs


Panther53521

Recommended Posts

This week:

Panthers win

Redskins - lose or tie

Packers - lose

Bucs - lose

Next week:

Panthers - win

Packers - lose

Redskins - lose or tie

Saints - lose

WE NEED ONE TIE FROM THE REDSKINS .... we will enter the playoffs as the 6th seed most likely playing the Giants or Cowboys (Giants can still win the East)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've come to terms with this season the minute we let KC back into the game and win it. The chances are sooo stacked against us. The Skins would have to tie or lose out. They have the bears and Giants. Giants may beat them, but the Bears are horrible. Could be a trap game for them. 

 

Green bay is hot and I doubt they lose anymore. 

 

Bucs are doable, Saints could lay an egg too. But still, way too many teams in the hunt that for them to lose like that would take a miracle. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, stbugs said:


The Redskins can't lose out. They have to lose one and tie one. We can't get in without that. We lose the tiebreaker with Minnesota in any other scenario. Again an 8-8 team makes the playoffs.

That said, you can go through every loss we had aside from Seattle. Some were more egregious than others like KC, Denver, Tampa and Oakland, but even if we went 50/50 in those close games we'd be in the playoffs easy.


Sent from my iPhone using CarolinaHuddle

So we need a tie...thats gay. Yeah we're not making it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Panther53521 said:

This week:

Panthers win

Redskins - lose or tie

Packers - lose

Bucs - lose

Next week:

Panthers - win

Packers - lose

Redskins - lose or tie

Saints - lose

WE NEED ONE TIE FROM THE REDSKINS .... we will enter the playoffs as the 6th seed most likely playing the Giants or Cowboys (Giants can still win the East)

This cant be right. The Vikings only have 7 losses so they have to be figured in here as well

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Panther53521 said:

This week:

Panthers win

Redskins - lose or tie

Packers - lose

Bucs - lose

Next week:

Panthers - win

Packers - lose

Redskins - lose or tie

Saints - lose

WE NEED ONE TIE FROM THE REDSKINS .... we will enter the playoffs as the 6th seed most likely playing the Giants or Cowboys (Giants can still win the East)

Piece of cake.  I was really sweating that one.  Thought we were out of it completely.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • lol, that second part is quite literally one of the dumbest things ever. Having or not having guaranteed contracts has absolutely nothing to do with how much these billionaires have to pay.  Because there is a hard cap and a minimum cap spend requirement, and teams either use their cap or roll it over to use it all the next year, so the owners have to pay the same amount of money in the end no matter what. Having fully guaranteed contracts in the NFL would only hurt salary cap management, and thus would end up screwing over the team and its fan base when teams kiss on signings as they take up cap room that is needed to improve the roster. Look at the Browns with Watson, they gave him the fully guaranteed deal and all it’s doing is sucking up massive cap space now.  If they hadn’t done that, the owner would still be paying the same amount of money each year as that cap space would still be used elsewhere. If you want to argue for fully guaranteed contracts because the players deserve it, that’s an entirely different argument and a fair one to discuss.  But anyone against fully guaranteed deals isn’t doing it to argue for the billionaire owners.
    • Start posting in threads in the other forums instead of just creating threads. No one comes over here so you aren't starting conversations.  Get your ass up to 100 posts. It's not that hard. Don't create 100 posts. Contribute to conversations. 
    • Ryabkin could be the steal of the draft, he was a Top 10 pick heading into last season and had a rough year.  Lots of GMs passed on him because of that and his workouts. Pick has really high upside and Svech should be able to translate Rod tearing his arse a new one for making dumb plays since Svech has had several years of it.  🤣😂
×
×
  • Create New...