Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Who would you least want to win the Super Bowl?

Cyberjag

By Cyberjag,
in Carolina Panthers

Who would you least want to win the Super Bowl?  

110 members have voted

  1. 1. Who would you least want to win the Super Bowl? You can choose more than one.

    • New England Patriots
      35
    • Dallas Cowboys
      40
    • Pittsburgh Steelers
      15
    • Atlanta Falcons
      77
    • Green Bay Packers
      6
    • Kansas City Chiefs
      3
    • Seattle Seahawks
      33
    • New York Giants
      4
    • Detroit Lions
      1
    • Houston Texans
      1
    • Miami Dolphins
      1
    • Oakland Raiders
      2

Recommended Posts

Nails Newbie

Nails

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, TheRed said:

Falcons, and honestly it isn't even close. Being the only team in the division without a Lombardi trophy would be quite pathetic.

Big picture you're probably right.  But thinking about Pete Carroll, Russell Wilson, Frank Clark, etc., as well as those fans in the kooky northwest and beyond is equally unbearable in the short term.  I'm done thinking about it because neither are even going to the big game I don't think.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Malt Liquor Collaborator

Malt Liquor

Posted
Posted

dallas cowboys by far. I don't like the falcons but let's be real they never won anything. The media would hype them, but nothing like the cowboys. If the cowboys win the NFL network, and ESPN might as well change their name to the cowboys network. It would be constant reports like, does Jerry Jones has sh*t stains in his panties?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Borat Collaborator

Borat

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, emhoward said:

They practically had a party on their forum when we lost.

 

21 minutes ago, CPF4LIFE said:

Falcons hands down. You think they weren't praying for us to lose last year?? 

Pleading the 5th here. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
ncfan Grand Master

ncfan

Posted
Posted

Dallas with Falcons close 2nd.

Itd suck to be the only team in the division without a ring

 

Dallas-  would be bad.  As much media hype at they get.  If they even make it to the super bowl.  ESPN 2 is going to become ESPND for Dallas.  Good luck getting into Walmart because they will be stocking those Dallas shirts by the truck load and the lines of the "we dem boys" fans who cant point out dallas on a texas map will look like black friday. Despite only winning 1-2 playoff games the last 20 years they will imediately be Crowned the top NFL organization ever by every network.  Goodell will be seen holding hands with Jerry Jones on the float leading the victory parade being shown on every major sports network.  AND if we start off to a bad start next year, you will see loads of Zeke and Dak jerseys in BOA (and some Romo jerseys because a few still think and convinced hes starting for Dallas despite breaking his collar bone week 1 starting for the Jets)

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Goondal Newbie

Goondal

Posted
Posted

Giants

I do not plan on watching any of it so I did it based on the people in my life who are the fans of the remaining teams.  Of those people both of the ones that are annoying about sports are Giants fans so I prefer not to have to listen to them.

The friends that were most supportive of me during/after out season last year were my Pats and Lions friends so I hope one of them win.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • MHS831
      Some homers' opinions of the OTs that we may realistically be able to get at 19

      By MHS831 · Posted

      I worry about the OT situation, but I do not expect to see them invest a  first rounder after signing a starter until they get information about Ickey.  I see drafting Moton's depth, but not if you reach in round 1 to do it. WR?  I am not happy with them either--the best WR in the draft was the second best WR on his team and the second best was a slot. Edge?  Deep in this draft.  Want to build your future?  Take advantage of the deep talent pool at edge.   LB? I love the expected day 2 collection.  C?  The draft is deep and round 3 and after  is when to shop.  Yes, we need a tackle and when we know more, we can be more strategic. IMO
    • SetfreexX
      Dave Canales: the next rockstar head coach

      By SetfreexX · Posted

      With Bryce,🤣🤣🤣
    • MHS831
      Some homers' opinions of the OTs that we may realistically be able to get at 19

      By MHS831 · Posted

      It is simple if you focus only on OT.  But there is the cap, talent levels that differ from year to year, and team needs that fluctuate, as you know.  While I would be happy with an OT and understand it, I am not sold on OT as the answer. I agree that the game is won or lost in the trenches, but I do not think over-drafting with the first round pick is the only way of addressing it--especially if it may be a year before you know what you have or reap the rewards.  We both agree that you have to stay ahead of it.  Just because you take a T in round 1 does not mean that you have met the need. Teams need qbs too, but drafting them too early in round one is usually disastrous A few weeks ago, I was high on Freeling.  I still am (cautiously), but there are reasons to approach some of these tackles with a "Buyer Beware" approach.  Again, I am not against drafting an OT in round 1, but not if that OT has a late first or second-round grade.  That is not good value.  On top of that, put him in the garage for a year?  Take Freeling, for example.  Some project him to Cleveland at 6.  Really?  He is a fringe first rounder, IMO.  IF you want to give away draft capital to get a non-starter, that is how GMs get fired. First, we can address Freeling’s seemingly massive improvement in pass protection. He did earn an outstanding 86.1 PFF pass-blocking grade in 2025, which ranked seventh among qualified FBS tackles. That was an improvement over his 65.3 mark in 2024. Georgia’s passing game was heavily built on play action and screens, which allowed Freeling to partake in just 95 true pass sets all season. That ranked just barely among the top 200 tackles in the country.   Freeling earned a solid 75.4 PFF pass-blocking grade on those true pass set reps, but that pales in comparison to top tackles in the class, such as Francis Mauigoa and Spencer Fano. Mauigoa earned his 85.8 true PFF pass-blocking grade, second best in the nation, across 212 such reps, more than twice as many as Freeling.   What about Freeling's run blocking?  61.3--which is slightly above all tackles in the country.  So if you draft Freeling in round 1, you are getting a guy whose numbers were padded by play action and screens--but in pure passing sets and in run blocking, he was average when compared to every tackle in the country. Elite?  Buyer beware. Lomu?  Athletic, Can struggle in the run game and against power rushers.  Late first rounder-early second, imo.  Arms less than 34", which could scare some teams. Proctor?  Can play high and the weight could be a problem he fights.  Personally, I see him as the best option for an immediate starter but his ceiling is lower.   I realize all players have areas of concern, but I think you will see some of these OTs drop on draft day, with good reason.   Fano?  32 inch arms may kick him inside to G. You will respond that all OTs have question marks, and they do--but not researching the situation is not the answer.  Freeling is a stud athlete, and despite the stats, I like him, but not as depth at 19.  Proctor?  I get it if you needed your starter now, and speed rushers give him fits.  To adjust, his angle to block a 9 tech is nearly 90 degrees when it needs to be closer to 45 degrees.  That decreases the pocket, and a short QB can't have that.     
×
×
  • Create New...