Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Who would you least want to win the Super Bowl?


Cyberjag

Who would you least want to win the Super Bowl?  

110 members have voted

  1. 1. Who would you least want to win the Super Bowl? You can choose more than one.

    • New England Patriots
      35
    • Dallas Cowboys
      40
    • Pittsburgh Steelers
      15
    • Atlanta Falcons
      77
    • Green Bay Packers
      6
    • Kansas City Chiefs
      3
    • Seattle Seahawks
      33
    • New York Giants
      4
    • Detroit Lions
      1
    • Houston Texans
      1
    • Miami Dolphins
      1
    • Oakland Raiders
      2


Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, TheRed said:

Falcons, and honestly it isn't even close. Being the only team in the division without a Lombardi trophy would be quite pathetic.

Big picture you're probably right.  But thinking about Pete Carroll, Russell Wilson, Frank Clark, etc., as well as those fans in the kooky northwest and beyond is equally unbearable in the short term.  I'm done thinking about it because neither are even going to the big game I don't think.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

dallas cowboys by far. I don't like the falcons but let's be real they never won anything. The media would hype them, but nothing like the cowboys. If the cowboys win the NFL network, and ESPN might as well change their name to the cowboys network. It would be constant reports like, does Jerry Jones has sh*t stains in his panties?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, emhoward said:

They practically had a party on their forum when we lost.

 

21 minutes ago, CPF4LIFE said:

Falcons hands down. You think they weren't praying for us to lose last year?? 

Pleading the 5th here. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dallas with Falcons close 2nd.

Itd suck to be the only team in the division without a ring

 

Dallas-  would be bad.  As much media hype at they get.  If they even make it to the super bowl.  ESPN 2 is going to become ESPND for Dallas.  Good luck getting into Walmart because they will be stocking those Dallas shirts by the truck load and the lines of the "we dem boys" fans who cant point out dallas on a texas map will look like black friday. Despite only winning 1-2 playoff games the last 20 years they will imediately be Crowned the top NFL organization ever by every network.  Goodell will be seen holding hands with Jerry Jones on the float leading the victory parade being shown on every major sports network.  AND if we start off to a bad start next year, you will see loads of Zeke and Dak jerseys in BOA (and some Romo jerseys because a few still think and convinced hes starting for Dallas despite breaking his collar bone week 1 starting for the Jets)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Giants

I do not plan on watching any of it so I did it based on the people in my life who are the fans of the remaining teams.  Of those people both of the ones that are annoying about sports are Giants fans so I prefer not to have to listen to them.

The friends that were most supportive of me during/after out season last year were my Pats and Lions friends so I hope one of them win.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • A rookie that has never played a snap and a proven 1000K NFL WR are not going to be viewed the same in these type rankings.  And calling draft picks, lotto picks, isn't some new quip I just invented.  take the big 3 Hubbard, AT, insert whatever 3rd Panther you want vs Kamara, Hill, Olave.  Most football folks outside of Carolina are picking the Saints there IMO.    
    • You didn’t really address the point, just like you ignored the point about the RBs initially, and saying “they are all lotto picks” is just a really silly reduction because you could say that about literally any player rookie or vet every snap, every game, every year. It is well known that different positions have different hit rates, and I would argue different types of prospects within position groups as well, and that hit rates change the further down in the draft you go. Everybody knows QB is different and that, for example, first round OL have a really high success rate. Using your lotto ticket analogy…again…you are saying a lotto ticket with a 1 in 100 chance of hitting is the exact same thing as a lotto ticket with a 1 in 2 chance of hitting (this is an example, don’t take these odds literally). The point was he is no more of a lotto ticket than the 31yr old receiver coming off a major knee injury, and in my opinion he is better odds with a higher potential “jackpot”. Saying one player is an “lotto ticket” while another isn’t is just not sound logic. You have no idea who will break out, regress, get injured, etc. There are safer bets than others, that’s all. I don’t think Diggs is a safe bet and even if he was, weighing him over all of the Panthers WRs plus 2 1k rushers is just dumb. You can disagree if you want. The list is stupid.
    • Yeah, this is all projections of how it will turn out. Inevitability this list will look ridiculous in a full 2025 sesson hindsight, most likely. Still, I am pretty surprised that so many bristled at being thought of as having very, very lowly ranked WR and TE units. We literally have been for years. All you have to do is just have things stay the same and those are immediately bottom 5 units. It is easy to see why one would be reticent to have lofty expectations in the preseason. Gotta show it first when you are a perennial cellar dweller. That's just life at the bottom.
×
×
  • Create New...