Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Future Contract - Darrell Young


SetfreexX

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, MV%doe said:

Competition. 

Whatever it takes to fix the running game, bet they focus on a blocking TE too. 

I'm still sick of seeing 3 fing guys meet Stewart before the Los, signing a FB isnt going to fix that tho.

I think it's just the oline. Even when healthy, they aren't particularly good run blockers. Oher and Remmers especially are two of the worst in the position at it. 

We need an upgrade but I just don't know where it can come from. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, mikeholiday said:

I think it's just the oline. Even when healthy, they aren't particularly good run blockers. Oher and Remmers especially are two of the worst in the position at it. 

We need an upgrade but I just don't know where it can come from. 

It's easy to say we need upgrades, and we certainly do, but finding them when 31 other teams are doing the same is not so easy.  Especially when there really isn't any available this year to begin with.  If you draft one they are going to be projects and they take a while to get up to speed, if they ever do.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Bogart said:

It's easy to say we need upgrades, and we certainly do, but finding them when 31 other teams are doing the same is not so easy.  Especially when there really isn't any available this year to begin with.  If you draft one they are going to be projects and they take a while to get up to speed, if they ever do.

I definitely agree. I don't have the answers. I don't see a OT deserving to be picked at 8. Either we overpay in free agency to upgrade the position or just draft one who can bring camp competition. 

We definitely need to add a tackle though. With Other's injury situation, I don't feel comfortable going into next season with our current rotation. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, mikeholiday said:

I definitely agree. I don't have the answers. I don't see a OT deserving to be picked at 8. Either we overpay in free agency to upgrade the position or just draft one who can bring camp competition. 

We definitely need to add a tackle though. With Other's injury situation, I don't feel comfortable going into next season with our current rotation. 

Dave will dig up some competition somewhere but it won't appease the haters.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, mikeholiday said:

I think it's just the oline. Even when healthy, they aren't particularly good run blockers. Oher and Remmers especially are two of the worst in the position at it. 

We need an upgrade but I just don't know where it can come from. 

Honestly I believe that's wrong. This is my guess, but normally when 3 defenders are meeting the RB behind the LOS it means the offensive is predictable. When a certain personal jogs out on the field and line up in a certain way, thus the defense knows exactly what is about to happen. I know tri Turner took a step back and Kalil was hurt(even before), but there's no reason when you combine norwell they should have that many issues running the rock. Unless the whole defense knows who, what, how, and where about the play call.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, MV%doe said:

Honestly I believe that's wrong. This is my guess, but normally when 3 defenders are meeting the RB behind the LOS it means the offensive is predictable. When a certain personal jogs out on the field and line up in a certain way, thus the defense knows exactly what is about to happen. I know tri Turner took a step back and Kalil was hurt(even before), but there's no reason when you combine norwell they should have that many issues running the rock. Unless the whole defense knows who, what, how, and where about the play call.

So you're saying that Shula is predictable?? Oh, you get out of here with that crazy talk you!

 

 

/sarcasm

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Not in same league. Caldwell just hit a 10.00 on the RAS. 2nd out of 3830 from 1987 onward.  https://x.com/MathBomb/status/2027885023387349047 Yeah I mean Louis had a sub 9.00 RAS. Still very very good, no doubt. Louis is small, no 2 ways about it. He is likely a sub package lb in nickel packages or specialized WLB. Be fine ST gunner to start for sure. 6 foot flat and 220lb is pushing it for a starting LB. At 10 to 20lbs less than the other LBs he'd better be closer to the top in most timed drills. He's gonna be challenged when some of the wrs in the class can matchup bigger stronger faster, much less TE in the run game.  Yeah instinct matter and he has them, but that size is a massive red flag compared to many of the other LBS in this class.    Rodriguez is the LB that really climbed this week from a pure grit guy to great flash with athleticism people wrote off cause he was a QB at first at UVA. 18.4mph in the backpedal. Production the last 2 years were great. I'd be thrilled with him as the future mike.   Hill likely moved out of 51 and into the top 45 picks ( Ravens at 45 I can't imagine don't bite if he makes it there). Honestly Hill imo is a 1st rounder and I'd be ok with him as he fits the MLB we have missed the last few years. People would crow it's a reach but he's top 30 all-time I'm RAS for a LB at 9.9+ . Plus he was big time in big games when he was healthy. And that br a big check: meds. 
    • Miller, Melo, Coby, Moose, and Bridges all on the floor at the same time must be a nightmare for defenses lol. Switch one out for Kon and still a nightmare. Coby really does bring a true 6th man value and looks like he could start if Melo was out after only a few games of getting his feet wet. 
×
×
  • Create New...