Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The Goodwill Donation. Anyone Know?


chknwing

Recommended Posts

I wish I did know, but I've seen Panthers paraphernalia (a shirt, jacket or ornaments here or there) in Goodwills all across the Triangle. My wife is unfortunately (or fortunately) an enthusiast and goes several times per week. 

One thing that I can tell you is that for some reason, they move items from store to store sometimes. Probably not furniture so much, but I've seen items that I've personally donated, seen on the floor of one store, only to see it at some other store.

On an off note, one time I saw a nice Panthers shirt that was in great shape. The initials "RR" were written on the tag in permanent marker, and it was size 3X. I said to myself "Nahhh...," but it really could have been Ron Rivera's.

So, basically, they spread their stuff around.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, h0llywood said:

I wonder why Goodwill of all places. That's a company, not a charity. 

Good luck to those who can snag these items though.

Just stop.

Goodwill is a 501(c)(3) charity. 

They are a nonprofit organization that provides job training, employment placement services, and other community-based programs for people who have barriers preventing them from otherwise obtaining a job (paraphrased form wikipedia) and one of my largest charitable tax deductions each year.

They use their thrift stores to help fund those activities.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, Inimicus said:

Just stop.

Goodwill is a 501(c)(3) charity. 

They are a nonprofit organization that provides job training, employment placement services, and other community-based programs for people who have barriers preventing them from otherwise obtaining a job (paraphrased form wikipedia) and one of my largest charitable tax deductions each year.

They use their thrift stores to help fund those activities.

They do some good things for the community, but they also grossly overpay their top executives, and underpay the rank and file (much like other companies). And, yes, I have researched this before, as there was a scandal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, top dawg said:

They do some good things for the community, but they also grossly overpay their top executives, and underpay the rank and file (much like other companies). And, yes, I have researched this before, as there was a scandal.

The bottom line.

 

Every organization grossly overpays their executives and underpays the rank and file. Is it ok? No.  But does it undo the real and measurable good they do in the community? Also no.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, Inimicus said:

The bottom line.

 

Every organization grossly overpays their executives and underpays the rank and file. Is it ok? No.  But does it undo the real and measurable good they do in the community? Also no.

The salvation army top guy only gets paid 13k a year. The thing is most people are greedy and will take a bigger piece of the pie when they have control of a company. Goodwill's top guy pockets north of 2 million. Would you donate to a place that gives back 95% or 50%. It all depends on the charity too so I suggest you do research instead of lumping them all together. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, panthers1234 said:

The salvation army top guy only gets paid 13k a year. The thing is most people are greedy and will take a bigger piece of the pie when they have control of a company. Goodwill's top guy pockets north of 2 million. Would you donate to a place that gives back 95% or 50%. It all depends on the charity too so I suggest you do research instead of lumping them all together. 

Id never argue that there aren't organizations that do better with money management or that are better at delivering services.

 

But the post I was responding to was asserting that Goodwill wasn't a charitable organization.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Inimicus said:

Id never argue that there aren't organizations that do better with money management or that are better at delivering services.

 

But the post I was responding to was asserting that Goodwill wasn't a charitable organization.

Not trying to be a smartass, but that post was specifically in response to my post which didn't challenge Goodwill's status as a charity---and one that does some good works in the community---just that their top execs were making an exorbitant amount of money in my opinion, especially as compared to the employees in their stores. You acknowledged it with a decidedly apologetic response, but I decided to let it ride. @panthers1234 decided to call you on it.

Different charities have different goals---nothing wrong with that---but when a lot of people think of charities, they don't necessarily like the idea of execs becoming millionaires from charitable contributions. That's not their first thought. They believe a chunk of that money could/should be allotted to the community programs that you laud. That's the real bottom line. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Inimicus said:

Id never argue that there aren't organizations that do better with money management or that are better at delivering services.

 

But the post I was responding to was asserting that Goodwill wasn't a charitable organization.

It's a piece of poo. They exploit disabled workers and overpay executives.  It's a farce of a charity. 

 

There is no defending these actions.

http://www.nbcnews.com/news/investigations/more-disabled-workers-paid-just-pennies-hour-v19916979

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yeah, I could jump right into the unbelievable Bryce debate now that some people are trying to flip the script because Bryce Young has, at most, a handful of decent games as a pro, but that's going to work itself out. Suffice it to say that I've seen better QBs (with an s) in a Panthers uniform, and I've certainly seen better QBs be drafted while we're playing around with Bryce, one of them who beat the crap out of us already this season... Let's forget about Bryce (and his markedly underwhelming play since he's been here); I think that most sane fans will agree that drafting him was an error, but it happens. Sure, it doesn't happen to the tune of King's ransom---including your main receiver---but it happens. You bet, you lose. Speaking of receivers...and betting and losing... Oh, man, we drafted Xavier Legette. Yes, just like with Bryce, I've entered "the dark side." Some Huddlers were telling us from the beginning, and they were right. But, I'm not apologizing for waiting to see what a guy's got before making my decision on him. X was a one-year wonder at South Carolina who parlayed some really nice production that season, a great personality and thick country accent, into becoming a first round pick (but only in Carolina). For Dan Morgan and company, He was a big swing that has turned into a big whiff (and I can still feel the ill breeze from that one). Sh¡t happens, right? Well, not so fast. Ladd McConkey was the decidedly more polished receiver who was literally ready to hit the ground running as soon as stepping onto the field as a pro. Ladd was never the biggest guy (though not the smallest), but he was the guy that could run routes, always seemed to get open---no question---and had the same speed as X, but with legit quickness and nuanced shake and bake. But Dan chose the project. He chose the guy where the game speed looks more like a tractor trailer than a 5.0 mustang. Look, I've supported X (just like Bryce) many many a day, but no more. Now I'm not saying that I won't root for the guy. Just like with Bryce, he seems like a great kid. But as far as giving excuses for the kid, and, perhaps more importantly, waiting for some miraculous breakout, I'm done with that. I've seen enough. You don't draft a project for a project. And yes, Bryce had proven to be a project after his first season. In my mind, drafting a supposedly number one receiver that needs lots of development for a starting quarterback that needs immediate help to try and further his development is not going to lead to good things. Pick the surest guy. Or at least pick the one who appears to be the surest guy, because picking can be tricky... especially when you're too busy tricking yourself. 
    • Winning ain't gonna make my eyes lie to me. Context matters, and it will always matter in the game of football.
    • That TD pass to Legette against Miami. Elite. The play where Bryce rolls right to buy time until Tet can reverse field.  Bryce pumps as multiple defenders close in.  He barely gets it away before he takes a big time hit.  Beautiful off platform throw and great catch by Tet.   The second TD to Tet against Dallas where Bryce dips and turns his shoulder in to evade the pass rusher.  Resets and finds Tet in the end zone. Dude embodies the Keep Pounding mantra.  
×
×
  • Create New...