Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Watching these playoff team's offenses


tiger7_88

Recommended Posts

15 minutes ago, tiger7_88 said:

Because of Cam.

Because they'd rather run Cam than throw the ball.

 

Um...Ok. You do know you are making a point as to why we are near the middle of the pack in Total Offense? Right?

 

I am truly sorry. But as long as we have Rivera, we are not going to be leading the league in Total Offense.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, bigdog10 said:

Atlanta is winning because they are effective at running the ball with Coleman and Freeman

Dallas is the one see because of their run game

New England looks invincible because of the duo of Blount and Dion Lewis

Laveon Bell has single handidly changed the steelers season

 

Ron is right. We need to run the ball better to lengthen drives and take some pressure off Cam. 

It is impossible to run with that offensive line. It is impossible to have a productive passing game with that offensive line. It is possible to be in last place with that offensive line.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, FootballLivesMatter said:

They were not as loaded as people make it out to be. Zeke is a rookie. Leading reciever was Cole Beasley. 

2015 Panthers were a better all around team than 2016 Cowboys.

Best OL in the league, arguably the best RB, elite outside WR in Dez, elite slot WR in Beasley, very good TE in Witten.

They're fuging LOADED.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Best OL in the league, arguably the best RB, elite outside WR in Dez, elite slot WR in Beasley, very good TE in Witten.

They're fuging LOADED.

Titans have the best O-line. Beasley, elite?

Other than the O-line, I think the Panthers match up pretty well. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, FootballLivesMatter said:

Excuses. Good teams find ways to win. Bad teams find ways to lose. 

Injuries are reasons teams lose.  That is just a reality.  Deep teams can overcome a few injuries, but if you get hit with a lot of them, you aren't going to win many games.

 

That being said, injuries don't excuse starting out 1-5 before the injuries were much of a problem.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, top dawg said:

Titans have the best O-line. Beasley, elite?

Other than the O-line, I think the Panthers match up pretty well. 

The Cowboys have the best OL. A rookie RB ran for over 1600 yards. 7th fewest sacks allowed while starting a rookie QB.

I would consider Beasley an elite slot receiver, but admittedly that's arguable.

We have three players who could start on offense for them - Cam, KB, and Olsen. That's it.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, FootballLivesMatter said:

You answered your question 

Didn't ask a question.  Made a statement.

 

People like to say that good teams find a way to overcome injuries.  But the reality is if the team has a lot of injuries, 99% of the time, they are no longer a good team.

 

However, injuries had almost nothing to do with our poor start.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

The Cowboys have the best OL. A rookie RB ran for over 1600 yards. 7th fewest sacks allowed while starting a rookie QB.

I would consider Beasley an elite slot receiver, but admittedly that's arguable.

We have three players who could start on offense for them - Cam, KB, and Olsen. That's it.

 

A rookie QB doesn't have anything to do with it, and Zeke is great, but many good RBs could run behind that line, including Stew.

PFF said it best about why the Titans were the best line this season, and I don't see any reason to disagree.

It seems heretical to suggest that the Dallas Cowboys did not field the best offensive line in the game in 2016, but Tennessee’s unit really was without a weakness all season. All five starters earned impressive grades in both run blocking and pass protection, paving the way to 2,180 rushing yards as a team, 1,777 of which came from their first two running backs, DeMarco Murray and Derrick Henry. No member of the offensive line surrendered more than three sacks on the season, and while LT Taylor Lewan fell off a little as the year wore on, conceding more penalties than you would like, on the other side, rookie RT Jack Conklin earned PFF All-Prohonors. This unit may not be able to match the Dallas line in terms of its very peak performers, but there was no weak link along this chain all season long, and that’s why the Tennessee Titans finish the season as our No. 1 ranked line.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I said could, not would. I recognize he has potential based on past performance. Compared to what KP has done, Howell has more potential and the physical traits to make noise. KP has small hands and a weak arm. Not something you want in even your backup QB.  I've been hammering since last off-season before we re-signed Dalton, improve the room. Other than getting younger, I don't see how anyone can say we legitimately improved the room or even tried. We might as well have signed Josh Rosen.  Dalton is still on the roster for now. That's 3 QBs unless we trade or cut him. He's still Bryce's mentor after all. Do you believe we are going to draft someone with potential and give them a legitimate opportunity to develop from the practice squad? Are we going to carry 3 QBs on the active roster? 4 for a developmental rookie? Are we going to potentially cut KP if we draft a rookie and he's outperformed? Doubtful. Cutting Dalton(if we can't trade him) and KP would be 8m in wasted cap space.  I chose Howell as an example because he showed promise in his only full season as a starter. You could plug in another name with the physical traits and potential and what i said would still apply. KP showed almost nothing and was benched. I genuinely don't care if it’s rookie pick as long as there is the potential to develop into a future NFL QB.  As much as I can't stand him, Bellichek was always developing a number 2 QB even with the GOAT as his starter. The wisdom of that was evident when Cassell came in when Brady was hurt week 1 and went 11-5 and almost made the wildcard, which 11-5 gets you almost any other year. I give credit where it's due though. Cassel and Jimmy G both came into the league as developmental QBs, potential QB1s, and went on to have careers.  You never know if you never try. KP feels like a punt in addressing the most important position on the field. Bryce has never played 2 full games of franchise QB level football back to back.  If Bryce progresses, are you ready to offer a 280m 5 year extension based off a one hit wonder year? If Bryce regresses and we need a QB in 27, are we going to trade a fortune away again to trade up to 1 to get one? Are you ready to do the past 3 years all over again?  To me, it's not about Kenny Pickett. It's about the move itself. It was a feeble attempt to improve the QB room. We better hope Bryce succeeds, because if he doesn't, we literally have no backup plan right now.   
    • IOL that early isn’t good value at all. We have a LT who might not ever be good again and a RT that might retire soon. T seems deep early in this draft, so I’d go there in the 1st. 
    • Season tickets aren't affordable anymore definitely when they've been so bad for 8 years before last season. When I started going my seats were front row uppers for like 38 bucks. Those seats are 100 dollars now. Teams make their money from tv, if I was an owner my goal would be to break even on tickets and concessions. 
×
×
  • Create New...