Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Watching these playoff team's offenses


tiger7_88

Recommended Posts

15 minutes ago, tiger7_88 said:

Because of Cam.

Because they'd rather run Cam than throw the ball.

 

Um...Ok. You do know you are making a point as to why we are near the middle of the pack in Total Offense? Right?

 

I am truly sorry. But as long as we have Rivera, we are not going to be leading the league in Total Offense.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, bigdog10 said:

Atlanta is winning because they are effective at running the ball with Coleman and Freeman

Dallas is the one see because of their run game

New England looks invincible because of the duo of Blount and Dion Lewis

Laveon Bell has single handidly changed the steelers season

 

Ron is right. We need to run the ball better to lengthen drives and take some pressure off Cam. 

It is impossible to run with that offensive line. It is impossible to have a productive passing game with that offensive line. It is possible to be in last place with that offensive line.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, FootballLivesMatter said:

They were not as loaded as people make it out to be. Zeke is a rookie. Leading reciever was Cole Beasley. 

2015 Panthers were a better all around team than 2016 Cowboys.

Best OL in the league, arguably the best RB, elite outside WR in Dez, elite slot WR in Beasley, very good TE in Witten.

They're fuging LOADED.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Best OL in the league, arguably the best RB, elite outside WR in Dez, elite slot WR in Beasley, very good TE in Witten.

They're fuging LOADED.

Titans have the best O-line. Beasley, elite?

Other than the O-line, I think the Panthers match up pretty well. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, FootballLivesMatter said:

Excuses. Good teams find ways to win. Bad teams find ways to lose. 

Injuries are reasons teams lose.  That is just a reality.  Deep teams can overcome a few injuries, but if you get hit with a lot of them, you aren't going to win many games.

 

That being said, injuries don't excuse starting out 1-5 before the injuries were much of a problem.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, top dawg said:

Titans have the best O-line. Beasley, elite?

Other than the O-line, I think the Panthers match up pretty well. 

The Cowboys have the best OL. A rookie RB ran for over 1600 yards. 7th fewest sacks allowed while starting a rookie QB.

I would consider Beasley an elite slot receiver, but admittedly that's arguable.

We have three players who could start on offense for them - Cam, KB, and Olsen. That's it.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, FootballLivesMatter said:

You answered your question 

Didn't ask a question.  Made a statement.

 

People like to say that good teams find a way to overcome injuries.  But the reality is if the team has a lot of injuries, 99% of the time, they are no longer a good team.

 

However, injuries had almost nothing to do with our poor start.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

The Cowboys have the best OL. A rookie RB ran for over 1600 yards. 7th fewest sacks allowed while starting a rookie QB.

I would consider Beasley an elite slot receiver, but admittedly that's arguable.

We have three players who could start on offense for them - Cam, KB, and Olsen. That's it.

 

A rookie QB doesn't have anything to do with it, and Zeke is great, but many good RBs could run behind that line, including Stew.

PFF said it best about why the Titans were the best line this season, and I don't see any reason to disagree.

It seems heretical to suggest that the Dallas Cowboys did not field the best offensive line in the game in 2016, but Tennessee’s unit really was without a weakness all season. All five starters earned impressive grades in both run blocking and pass protection, paving the way to 2,180 rushing yards as a team, 1,777 of which came from their first two running backs, DeMarco Murray and Derrick Henry. No member of the offensive line surrendered more than three sacks on the season, and while LT Taylor Lewan fell off a little as the year wore on, conceding more penalties than you would like, on the other side, rookie RT Jack Conklin earned PFF All-Prohonors. This unit may not be able to match the Dallas line in terms of its very peak performers, but there was no weak link along this chain all season long, and that’s why the Tennessee Titans finish the season as our No. 1 ranked line.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • with arm strength people often get stuck on the distance  arm strength in the NFL is moreso measured in speed / velocity .which of course is how long does it take for  the ball to travel from the time of release until it reaches its target ? & u beat world class speed with more speed on the ball...just saying  
    • No GM hits 100%. I'm well aware. But what a GM has to do is look at the roster, what's available, and future contracts and go from there. XL was a one season wonder in college. He has speed. Who cares. He body catches and his hands are bricks. Speed doesn't matter when you don't actually have the ball. There were other receivers available with better resumes. XL was a project. Fitts loved projects. You don't have the luxury of projects when you just traded away DJ for a QB. 1st round WRs need to contribute now.  Brooks was a luxury RB pick we didn't have the luxury to make. Who cares if Dallas was going to pick him. We had holes all over our defense. Chuba was coming off a fresh contract. We just inked 150m interior line and then centered it by moving a guard to center that had suffered 2 season ending injuries. The most critical area on our line was being held together by a bandaid and a prayer. No surprise when it didn't work.   Wallace is getting better but Wilson was sitting there waiting to be taken. DPOY for college football right there for the taking. That was a gimme pick. If you're going to take a risk on an injured player, the 3rd round for Wilson made a whole lot more sense at a position we were rest stop TP thin at.  4th round and on aren't going to be heavy contributors unless you're lucky.  He did well on the trade for Jackson. Coker, I believe he offered the largest guarantee. He actually got more than some late round picks make.  Those 1st 3 picks, IMO, were straight up whiffs.  Looking back at Fitterer's picks, I think he tried to plug holes because we had a ton of them. Problem was, he wasn't very good at it and he loved RAS scores and developmental players with a coach that couldn't develop a Polaroid. He tried to do too much. He was impatient. His other problem was he panicked during the draft and couldn't read or understand the flow of how drafts tend to go. DJ Johnson was the prime example. We needed an edge rusher and he jumped in at the end of the run instead of starting it.  Morgan's first year looked exactly like Fitts to me. Lots of projects.  2nd year looks better.  We'll see how 3rd year goes. FA also plays into all of this as well but that's a whole different topic of how it played out and planning with regard to drafting. 
    • I judge how good our players are by the way a defense covers them. XL draws no special coverage. Coker on the other hand always has a man over the top. It still doesn’t matter. You be the judge.
×
×
  • Create New...