Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Coaching philosophy concern


Leeroy Jenkins PhD

Recommended Posts

Something was said in Steve Wilks Q&A that has me concerned and I believe it has to do with Ron's overall coaching philosophy.  

 

He stated something along the lines of; were not going to try and out-scheme our opponents.   

 

He said this like it was meant to be a comforting stance.   It really got me thinking about our coaching staff and their overall philosophy.   Does Ron not emphasize individually tailored game plans based on an opponents strengths and weaknesses?  IMO,  it would explain a lot about our predictably and lack of in-game adjustments.   Does that statement concern you or am I reading too much into it? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, csx said:

What is the quote? I don't see it on the Steve Wilks Q&A

Sorry the quote came from his press conference.  I am at work, so I can't find the exact moment.  If you have the time, feel free to let me know when and the exact quote and I will update the OP

http://www.panthers.com/media-vault/videos/Wilks-Im-ready-to-step-into-this-role/2faf748f-6d02-412b-a2dd-8819959a5888

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, stbugs said:

I've always thought that we won more based on talent than doing anything to exploit the opponents weaknesses. I think that is why we are so damn inconsistent at times. When other teams figure something out or in some cases get lucky guessing right, we have no answer. In 2015, we had enough takeaways and Cam made enough throws that it worked, but in 2016, almost the same team gets hit by injuries and doesn't get the luck and we finish last in the division.

exactly, 2015 was because of hurney and gman.  Ron and staff were along for the ride.

 

ron is the antithesis of belichick

Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, stbugs said:

Yep, and unfortunately, the one area in 2016 where we actually seemed to adjust and do better was defense after the bye and our DC is now gone. Some was health (we did lose Kuechly for 6 of the last 10 and Addison for a few), i.e. having Bradberry, Johnson and Worley playing CB instead of  Bene, Teddy and Sanchez made a big difference as witnessed in the Atlanta/NO games the second time around. Also, the scheming that Ealy mentioned that they worked on during the by helped us go from little pass rush to among the top sack teams. Our offense didn't adjust at all.

I really have very little confidence in our coaching and honestly, unless Gettleman knocks it out of the park in FA and the draft, I'd be worried about getting back to the top based on comments like that. It shows me that evolve and get better turns into Shula's request for more talent to be able to maintain the #1 scoring offense. Not being able to out-scheme leaves very little margin for error and gets you a loss in the Super Bowl.

Do the Pats out-scheme people, or does Belichick acquire smart players that fit his scheme, observe tendencies, and use specific players to exploit specific things that he sees as weaknesses in opponents' schemes from week to week? There is a difference, even if subtle.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I interpreted that statement as, "We're not going to get cute with fancy schemes." I don't think it's necessary to be flashy if everyone keeps their assignments and ACTUALLY TACKLES THE BALL CARRIER with consistency. We've used plenty of creative schemes on defense, and we have the smartest MLB in the NFL, but that hasn't been the problem. The problem has been poor tackling and guys being in the wrong place at the wrong time. That's fundamental stuff. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, PanthersBigD said:

I interpreted that statement as, "We're not going to get cute with fancy schemes." I don't think it's necessary to be flashy if everyone keeps their assignments and ACTUALLY TACKLES THE BALL CARRIER with consistency. We've used plenty of creative schemes on defense, and we have the smartest MLB in the NFL, but that hasn't been the problem. The problem has been poor tackling and guys being in the wrong place at the wrong time. That's fundamental stuff. 

Yeah, the feeling that I left away with, despite thinking that perhaps Wilks was just being bad-ass, is that players are going to have to execute their assignments, and if they don't, then they won't see the field.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Let's say we have a LT for 2026, because we do.  After that, let's say we Ickey could be back and we would have the option of extending Walker.   Don't get me wrong--I LOVE drafting OL.  Teams obviously get desperate for OTs and if they enter the draft without 2 solid tackles, they are almost obligated to reach for a first round OT.  This year, I see 1 OT who is probably worth first-round consideration, and I am not putting him in the top 10 players in the draft.  Lomu, Freeling, Miller, and Proctor, for example, probably and arguably have second-round value.  So why would you reach for an OT in round 1 when you already have starters at both T positions but you have other needs? We do need depth, however, and I think there is decent OT depth that needs development on day 3. They are no slouches, by the way.   Drew Shelton (could drop to round 4): Surrendered 1 sack as Penn State's LT in 2025. 33 3/8" arms.  Pass pro improved every year (4 years--experienced).  "For a team running a zone-heavy scheme that values lateral movement and reach-blocking ability over phone-booth mauling, Shelton has real appeal. He is not a plug-and-play starter, but the athletic tools and the clear year-over-year improvement suggest a player who can develop into a capable starter if a coaching staff invests in his strength base and cleans up his technique. The ceiling depends entirely on how much stronger he can get and whether his feet can stay alive after initial contact."   Austin Barber  (could drop to round 4): I see him as a RT at best and a probable kick inside to Guard where his strengths would switch from secondary to primary tools.  Considering Lewis and Hunt may be gone in a year or two, this would give the Panthers a chance to work him at RT and then move him inside if he is not effective, and there is confidence that G may be his best position. Jude Bowery (4th round projection) was LT on a Boston College OL that was effective in the run game.  Bowery is one of the most athletic OTs in the draft.  His arms are not ideal but not too short (33.75") to play LT.  He surrendered 2 sacks. He is raw, and needs some technical refinement with his hands.  I think he has the best upside and value for this offense.   Dametrious Crownover  TexAM (5th round projection; 35 3/8" arms) is one of the more fascinating developmental tackles in this class because the physical tools are legitimately rare. A strong run blocker who should be better in pass protection with his tools.  "You do not find many 6-7, 336-pound men with that foot speed and who have the athletic background of a converted tight end. When everything clicks, he looks like a starting right tackle in a gap-heavy run scheme, smothering defenders at the point of attack and using his length to erase speed off the edge. The 2024 tape, when he anchored one of the best rushing attacks in the SEC, is the version of Crownover that gets offensive line coaches excited."  THIS is the kind of player our coaches could develop until Moton is done. What made World intriguing coming out of Eugene was the untapped ceiling, a fifth-year transfer who arrived as the top-ranked offensive tackle in the portal and looked the part for stretches. The improvement he showed against Big Ten competition in his one Oregon season was real, and the physical foundation, length, athleticism, and improving technique in pass protection, is still there. The ACL tear suffered in the College Football Playoff semifinal against Indiana doesn't erase that, but it changes the conversation significantly. The injury clouds the immediate projection. Most ACL recoveries for offensive linemen run nine to twelve months, which means World is likely unavailable for meaningful action well into his rookie season at the earliest. The combine absence removes his chance to reset the narrative physically, and teams will be making decisions almost entirely off pre-injury film and medical evaluations. The contrast between his polished pass sets and his inconsistent run blocking was already a developmental concern, and now those technique issues get deferred further while he rehabs. Isaiah World  (Oregon, injured ACL in playoffs, 5th round projection--could slide to 6th).  World will not play much if at all in 2026, which is why he might fall.  For the Panthers' purposes, however, this would give the OL coaches time to work with him. "What made World intriguing coming out of Eugene was the untapped ceiling, a fifth-year transfer who arrived as the top-ranked offensive tackle in the portal and looked the part for stretches. The improvement he showed against Big Ten competition in his one Oregon season was real, and the physical foundation, length, athleticism, and improving technique in pass protection, is still there. The ACL tear suffered in the College Football Playoff semifinal against Indiana doesn't erase that, but it changes the conversation significantly." "That said, the investment argument isn't crazy for the right organization. This is still a tackle with first-round portal grades and the kind of athletic profile that doesn't just disappear. A team with patience and a strong offensive line room can afford to stash World on the roster, let him develop his lower-body power and pad-level consistency during the recovery process, and potentially unlock a starting-caliber right tackle somewhere in his second or third season. The path is longer now, but the destination hasn't changed for a scout willing to bet on the physical tools." You get the idea. If we do not need the OT immediately, draft one later and develop him as depth and for next season.  Most college players drafted in round 1 were not first rounders if they had entered the draft the year before,  so why not grab a player with upside?      
    • Its never the QBs fault, so if we get a new WR and he looks bad he must be a bust
    • Based on what? Its certainly not his in game coaching prowess. 
×
×
  • Create New...