Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

4-3 DEs in the Draft


davos

Recommended Posts

I'm not suggesting this as a round 1-2 deal but I see a ton of talent in the DE class and this is not always a position where you can just grab talent wherever, whenever.

DEs

Given/top targets: Garrett (gone), Derek Barnett (Who I think may fall), Solomon Thomas

But here comes the second wave..and a lot of years this is usually where you get more strictly 3-tech/fringe DT or 3-4 edge rushers, but man, I'm seeing a lot of potential 3 down 4-3 DEs in this class and it presents us some good options. Here we go:

 

Daeshon Hall 6'5 265 (The other DE from the Aggies) 

100516-cfb-aggies.vresize.330.186.high.1

Talk athletic, this guy can be dominant and without Garrett on the same line.  He showed up very well at the Senior Bowl and honestly, the more I read up on him, the more I like him.  His initial quickness off the snap is the best in this class IMO. He's powerful and if we want to get to the QB quick without blitzing, this is the type of guy I could see fitting in perfectly here.  

http://sportsday.dallasnews.com/college-sports/collegesports/2017/01/25/texas-am-defensive-draft-prospect-turning-heads-senior-bowl-week

He will be rising on boards and think he would be a great pick round 2.  

 

Tanoh Kpassagnon 6'7 290 Villanova

villanova-athletics-tanoh-kpassagnon.jpg

The inevitable given the chatter here...So we have reports we "like" this kid already and it's easy to see why he's had scouts drooling.  He's 6'7 290 but plays like he's 250.  Crazy athletic for his size and has a motor.  If his skill can translate and come into fruition, he's a monster.  Seeing his college clips, he looks like a man amongst boys...the competition leap is huge from Nova.  Some could argue he could fit a 3-4 like a Preston Smith but he's so versatile, he fits both schemes as a starter.  

 

Taco Charlton 6'6 272 Michigan

BuffaloTaco-590x394.jpg

Taco meets all the criteria on paper for a 4-3 DE.  The thing is, he just doesn't seem to have that extra zing and zest.  I'll cheat and say I agree with CBS where it describes him like Justin Tuck (probably at his ceiling).  He can very well be an above average end that will help a team but not a stud 10+ sack/yr type.    

 

Sleeper:

Deatrich Wise Jr.  6'5 271 Arkansas

He has length and measurables stack up to a true 4-3 DE and he has a ridiculously long wingspan. Very high ceiling from my view.   A good write up on him:

http://withthefirstpick.com/2016/08/03/2017-nfl-draft-arkansas-deatrich-wise-jr-scouting-report/

He plays his size, went against top competition and has a lot of potential.  

 

 

 

--

Edit:

To add a few more on the fringe 3 down side of things or if we double dip...

 

DeMarcus Walker 6'4 280 FSU

More of a base end who I can't imagine being a sack machine but could be a viable NFL starter.  Consider fringe because he's got fatigue issues at times.  

 

Tarell Basham 6'4 260

Solid in both run support and pass rushing but with the competition increase, may start out as a DPR.  More of a potential base-end 4-3 starter like Walker.  

http://www.ganggreennation.com/2016/12/23/14067236/scouting-the-2017-nfl-draft-tarell-basham-edge-ohio

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pie for Hall. So quick off the line. He'd be a situational pass rusher until he added more strength. If you watch his games against LSU and Alabama he's too easily moved. 

The more I watch Taco the more I like him. To think he's just coming into his own is the scary part. He's so athletic.

So many pass rushers in this draft with incredibly high ceilings imo.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, *FreeFua* said:

Pie for Hall. So quick off the line. He'd be a situational pass rusher until he added more strength. If you watch his games against LSU and Alabama he's too easily moved. 

The more I watch Taco the more I like him. To think he's just coming into his own is the scary part. He's so athletic.

So many pass rushers in this draft with incredibly high ceilings imo.  

For sure.  And yeah, he had some tough matchups against big lines but I really think he has the 3 down ability.  He has still shown himself to be a powerful guy and I don't see him as a one dimensional DPR type.  

I see Tanoh is starting to get hype, but don't want people to overlook Hall.

To address others--A double dip could very well be possible.  It puts more pressure in a make or break season for Ealy and I just wouldn't want to miss out on some of the DL talent in this draft.  It's great.  

Good draft to need a DE, TE, or S and we fit right into that criteria.  Hopefully DG capitalizes.  

I'll save my mock for the one where I include all the beach babes but there's a few scenarios with Hall and Tanoh I've been floating.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, ncfan said:

Id love Tanoh in the 2nd then Hall with our 3rd round comp

 

1st: Fournette (assuming Jamal Adams is gone)

2nd: Tanoh

3rd: Leggett (deep TE, think he drops to here)

3rd b: Hall

4th: KD Cannon

That would be an awesome scenario

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, stbugs said:

Fringe, not a sack machine? Did you watch the bowl game against Michigan? 4 tackles for loss and 1 sack. He looked phenomenal and is a way better prospect than Tanoh or Hall. Hall had 3.5 sacks in 2016 against similar level competition compared to Walker's 16 sacks. Walker had more games with 2 or more sacks (5) than Hall had sacks. Tanoh had 11 sacks against FCS level opponents.

Walker looked like a stud in the bowl game against Michigan. In most rankings, he's usually right behind Taco/Thomas/Barnett. I'm ignoring the guys who seem like they are more 3-4 OLB.

I'd be more than happy with Walker at 40 and if some other DEs somehow jump him, I hope we trade up from our 3rd to snag him. If somehow he drops to 72, we damn well better take him there.

Valid points in regards to Walker but he still has a fringe body type; I can see him inside on passing downs so that's why he wasn't in the first leg of the OP.  He piled up sacks in college but given his frame, his numbers may not translate in the NFL unless he grows his moves arsenal.  Though, I agree--we could obviously benefit by him coming here and would not have an issue with him at 40.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Can we stop with the stupid attention whore hot take type posts and just enjoy a winning streak for once? 
    • Every player has faults, and many times they can be categorized neatly into obvious traits that make analysis pretty straight-forward. A running back who thrives in zone schemes where their vision and patience is rewarded may struggle when asked to play a physical, violent, north-south style. A quarterback who can make every throw under the sun may never grasp the schematic purpose of the plays he is being asked to run and therefore constantly makes the wrong decision or no decision even with players running free. But the narrative for Bryce Young has almost consistently focused on his size and overall physicality in a league full of supermen, and how it places a hard limit on his ability to do things like shrug off blockers or throw tactical nuclear strikes from 80 yards out. Two seasons plus in hasn't put those concerns fully to rest, but if there is one underlining trait that could potentially derail Bryce's career, it's much more nebulous: his ability to recognize when a play is dead. The proclivity for turnovers that has haunted Bryce through his career doesn't always have the same underlying reasons as most typical young quarterbacks: adjusting to the speed of play, the tightness of NFL throwing windows, being able to diagnose much more advanced coverages, understanding the playbook, etc. One consistent thread is a defining trait that is both a curse and a strength: his ability to make plays off script, which has carried over from his Alabama days. For every miracle escape and razor-margin throw downfield like the 4th down play vs the Dolphins, you seem to have an inexcusable dropped fumble without even being touched (also see Dolphins game.) And the genesis of both is his underlying aggressiveness to make something happen with every snap, sometimes even when the play itself is simply unsalvageable. What often gets Young into trouble isn't an inability to execute a play, but his unwillingness to concede that the risk/reward ratio for a given decision simply isn't worth the attempt. There are few things that will drive a coach to putting a schematic leash on a player more quickly then when that player's outcomes become unpredictable, and even multiple miracle plays can be negated by a single colossal mistake. Where Bryce must find a balance is retaining the ability to conjure magic when needed, but to also keep his risk/reward instincts fully calibrated to what the team as a whole is comfortable with. No successful coach is entirely risk-averse, and many tend to be overly conservative in situations that decides the outcome of games, but "bad" Bryce sometimes emerges in situations where the only correct decision is to simply eat the ball and move on to the next play or next drive. If he can develop a better understanding of this flaw and work to overcome it without abandoning the traits that also make him special, he will take one step closer to becoming the player this franchise sacrificed so much for and redeeming that faith with the entire fanbase.
    • Is there a fifth option for welded shut and hermetically sealed?
×
×
  • Create New...