Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

PFT/Denver Post-Broncos unlikely to pick up Okung option


Nails

Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, My Goodness My Guinness said:

A lot of this can be attributed to a combination of age and injury problems mixed with a contract that the team doesn't think is worth the risk/hassle. The same argument can be seen by some on here about Stewart. He has a high salary for a runningback, injury problems and is getting old. It's not that Stewart isn't a good runningback, he just doesn't seem worth the money to some people. 

Sooooo.... You're saying we can trade him for the #1 pick right?  ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, Jay Roosevelt said:

If Okung is allowed to hit free agency, he's our best bet, IMO. Not top-tier, but he's been to and won a Super Bowl and is better than anyone we've had at either tackle spot since Jordan Gross retired.

A ton of value, tangible and intangible, in keeping him from returning to Seattle as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Promethean Forerunner said:

Seriously.

It's like being envious of Dallas. Sure, they got the best OL in the game but it came with a hefty price... a decade of complete disappointment and incompetence.

The Cowboys starting line is made up of a 9th pick, 16, 31, 4th rounder, and an UDFA.  It didn't take what you are suggesting to draft it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Promethean Forerunner said:

Collins was an UDFA because he was an idiot. He was considered a Top 20 pick at OT however.

Martin is an OG who was drafted 16th overall. Guards usually don't go that high. And if they do, they rarely work out (ex. Warmack).

T. Smith was a 9th overall pick at possibly the most important position.

Outside Free and Federick, the Dallas OL was a byproduct of mediocrity for years. Hell, Free is not even that good anymore at RT. Similar to us, they got a very good interior. They were just lucky enough land a franchise LT though.

Turner is a 3rd rounder, Kalil is a 2nd rounder, Norwell is an UDFA, and Oher and Remmers were pick ups via FA. I say we got great value for not having to a Top 15 pick every year.

There is also some luck involved in getting a player like T.Smith.  Even if you are bad enough to get a top 10 pick the player has to be there for you to pick.  I would guess if he was in this year's draft he would definitely be in consideration for our 8th pick.

Actually he probably would go before our pick but the 2011 draft was pretty good so he fell to 9th.

People think you can just make it happen by spending a draft a pick on a certain position.  If it was that easy every team would have good o-line, but then people would start complaining about their d-lines.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, Promethean Forerunner said:

He's not going back to Seattle. They let him go because he was an average OT asking for elite money. 

Now Denver let him go because of the same reason, and you guys want to overpay him??? Thank God some of you aren't GMs.

avg would  be a tremendous upgrade for us...idk about overpaying but we should offer him a good offer if available...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, AU-panther said:

There is also some luck involved in getting a player like T.Smith.  Even if you are bad enough to get a top 10 pick the player has to be there for you to pick.  I would guess if he was in this year's draft he would definitely be in consideration for our 8th pick.

Actually he probably would go before our pick but the 2011 draft was pretty good so he fell to 9th.

People think you can just make it happen by spending a draft a pick on a certain position.  If it was that easy every team would have good o-line, but then people would start complaining about their d-lines.

2011 was all time good.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, Promethean Forerunner said:

Collins was an UDFA because he was an idiot. He was considered a Top 20 pick at OT however.

Martin is an OG who was drafted 16th overall. Guards usually don't go that high. And if they do, they rarely work out (ex. Warmack).

T. Smith was a 9th overall pick at possibly the most important position.

Outside Free and Federick, the Dallas OL was a byproduct of mediocrity for years. Hell, Free is not even that good anymore at RT. Similar to us, they got a very good interior. They were just lucky enough land a franchise LT though.

Turner is a 3rd rounder, Kalil is a 2nd rounder, Norwell is an UDFA, and Oher and Remmers were pick ups via FA. I say we got great value for not having to a Top 15 pick every year.

They invested one higher  1st rd pick on their OL and one mid 1st. That's it. The only thing they did was commit to drafting OL. You would have a point if they were all drafted in the top 10 but it was only 1.

Their highest picks recently (4 & 6) went to rb and cb.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 2/16/2017 at 10:42 PM, Promethean Forerunner said:

He's not going back to Seattle. They let him go because he was an average OT asking for elite money. 

Now Denver let him go because of the same reason, and you guys want to overpay him??? Thank God some of you aren't GMs.

Smart man.  I live in Denver and listen to the sports talk radio on the way in to work every morning and Okung sucked this year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I don't think it was fear of the unknown because he tried to hide the extent of the injuries that made him drop. After the drop, the reports I heard were that teams knew what was wrong with his knee and it was something similar to another athlete from a few years ago (honestly don't remember if it was even a football player).  That it was basically one of those things where he should be fine for a while, there isn't a huge concern of immediate injury risk.   But what he has going on with his knee is something that is degenerative and there's little chance he'll be able to play more than 5 or so years on it before he won't be able to play anymore. So basically it was teams knowing if they draft him, he's probably going to be only a rookie contract player and even if he's great, you might not be able to get use out of him on a second contract.  Which in turn makes the drop make sense, but I'm kinda surprised some contending team didn't take him late in the 1st, hoping he'd put them over the top on a SB run but then not even have to worry about giving him a big contract in 4 years too.
    • Depends if they see the writing on the wall with their roster and contracts and decide to bite the bullet and begin a complete rebuild and roster overhaul.  I have no clue why some franchises (IE us) refuse to do this and keep half assing trying to win 8 games or so.  Do it correctly, take your lumps and build a contender.  We shall see what loomis decides.
    • Each team plays 17 games.  I do not see why they don't just have each team play one international game per year.  Neutral site game, 8 home, 8 away.    
×
×
  • Create New...