Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Whitworth back in play!!!!!!!


Toomers

Recommended Posts

I'm realizing that while it isn't optimal, a LT must be brought in to shore up the line until a long term solution is found.  

Age/character/money are just a non-factor in our current situation.

The age old huddle joke "but can he play LT?" is the actual question that must be answered.

If "he" can, then he should be on our roster yesterday.  I'm not concerned with who "he" is, just as long as he can keep Cam on his feet and clean.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, L-TownCat said:

I'm realizing that while it isn't optimal, a LT must be brought in to shore up the line until a long term solution is found.  

Age/character/money are just a non-factor in our current situation.

The age old huddle joke "but can he play LT?" is the actual question that must be answered.

If "he" can, then he should be on our roster yesterday.  I'm not concerned with who "he" is, just as long as he can keep Cam on his feet and clean.

    That's the bottom line. We need a solid to very good LT right now. Since every other option struggles to be solid, I'll gladly pay a little extra for very good. 

 And even 12M/yr is about the right value. What is top 5-10 level LT play worth per year? Considering you have to overpay for any FA of value, even 12M for him isn't bad.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

50 minutes ago, csx said:

Character is always a factor and should be IMO

I doubt we sign anyone with major character issues as there are quite a few guys to choose from.  However, this franchise has placed character above all for a long time.  In this particular case/situation It has to take a reduced role in the decision. 

Im not advocating a pos to be on the team but I'd take a flyer on somebody and hope our strong and veteran leadership can keep a him in line for a year or two.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I'm really not stressing about upgrading from Bryce. I'm frustrated with our inability (or refusal) to recognize overall bad QB performance and failure to seriously address the issue. QB is the most impactful position on the field, and we're not only settling for what we've been given to this point, but we've rewarded it with a fully guaranteed 5th year extension for a player that's never played 2 NFL franchise QB quality games back to back in 3 seasons. I can't understand how that's ok from a coach's or GM's viewpoint. Successful franchises don't do things like this. It just doesn't make sense.  We do not have a top half of the league QB right now. Since we don't have that player, we should be looking for him. Pickett isn't it. Grier isn't it. Bryce hasn't proven he is yet. Until you have that sure fire franchise QB, you keep looking. You're not consistently making the playoffs, a deep run, or a SB appearance without one.  What's the worst that could happen? We end up with 2 potential number 1 QBs? How horrible. 
    • Easy to understand Pickett, if this is anywhere close to on point. Canales wants to get as close to Bryce as he can- get the pace and timing in the throws as close a he can to Bryce. So the other players don’t have to adjust so much, to a new guy.       If Cam was the 1, he would look for a rocket arm.  But Bryce is the 1. Look for limited in the same way.  Low velocity, plenty of air under it, feels just like home when Picket comes in. And you have the guys on the second team not having such a radical adjustment (if they have to play) like with Dalton to Bryce.    Enter Grier. I guess we will collect those types.   
    • Best part is if we draft him, we can also use him as our fourth and one QB sneaker
×
×
  • Create New...