Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Combine 40 Reactions Here


Catufb85

Recommended Posts

The Fat Boys starting the day off with the 40 this morning. Kicked off around Nine. Tracking to keep track of it at work but so far this morning...

TCU OL Aviante Collins 6'4 295 just ran a 4.75 40 and had 34 reps yesterday.. This kid just earned some $$$

Utah OL Garrett Bolles 6'5 297 ran a 4.91 40.

Keep the post coming. Running backs coming up shortly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Catufb85 said:

The Fat Boys starting the day off with the 40 this morning. Kicked off around Nine. Tracking to keep track of it at work but so far this morning...

TCU OL Aviante Collins 6'4 295 just ran a 4.75 40 and had 34 reps yesterday.. This kid just earned some $$$

Utah OL Garrett Bolles 6'5 297 ran a 4.91 40.

Keep the post coming. Running backs coming up shortly.

McCaffrey to run 4.4

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bolles is definitely helping his case for a Day 1 selection at tackle.  Biggest "loser" today so far has to be Zach Banner logged slowest 40 and looking "slow-footed" in the "Shakira" drill.  Kinda as expected at 6'8 350.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Manos said:


It kinda translates into how well the get downfield to block on screens right? So if you are a screen heavy team I could see you wanting a "faster" lineman.

Sent from my XT1254 using CarolinaHuddle mobile app
 

I doubt hardly any team pays attention to anything other than the 10 yard split. After that, it doesn't matter. You never see an OL get knocked because he lacks "deep speed". LOL!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Of all the pointless drills at the Combine, OL 40s have to be at the very top of that list.



10 yard split is really the only thing you want to look at there. No OL is running down field.
10 yard split shows how quick a burst they can get out of the stance and if a screem pass how quickly they can get over and open stuff up

Sent from my SM-T710 using CarolinaHuddle mobile app

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • If we were a solid winning organization most of us would have no problems with this selection. We would have had a capable starter in place to allow him to be eased into the rotation. If were told prior to the draft that he had been completely cleared health wise, we "probably" wouldn't have a ton of reservations about this selection. If we had picked this young man on Day 3 of the draft most of us would have no problems with this selection because we wouldn't have had to use draft capital to move up and get him. Unfortunately, none of the above were true 1)  We were a terrible team in 2024 and needed an immediate impact player. 2)  He was hurt near the the end of the 2023 season. We traded up to get him even though we knew he wasn't medically cleared to play in 2024. 3) When training camp started we were hearing stories that the knee wasn't ready. That alone should have raised some red flags. I personally would have red-shirted him in 2024 in order to have him ready for 2025. We had Chubba as our lead back and other guys to fill the #2 and #3 spots on the depth chart. There was no need to rush Brooks unto the field in 2024. Here's our draft history in the 2nd round between 2021 and 2024 2021 TMJ 2022 No draft choice. We picked Matt Corall in round 3 (#94) as our only Day 2 pick. 2023 Jonathan Mingo 2024 Jonathon Brooks. We have taken 4 skill players on Day 2 of the draft for the past 4 years who have contributed absolutely nothing to the offensive side of the football. 3 are no longer on the team. Two of them are no longer in the NFL. One  could possibly never start a game due to a knee injury. This type of poor drafting is why this team has been so bad for the entire decade. 
    • Even limited as he was I still don't think they have replaced his production, and not just the sack stats. The games Clowney missed it was very obvious what his value still was. Risky move but whatever. They only had 32 sacks last year and if that drops then it's going to get ugly. I see the improvement in run stopping but not in pass protect in any way.  
    • I have zero issues with this.  
×
×
  • Create New...