Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

IMHO!!


WOW!!

Recommended Posts

From what I'm seeing in the moves that have been made .. Here are a few opinions on future transactions...

1. Gman has conceeded that Fournette, Thomas and the 2 safeties are not going to be on the board at 8.. So he might be trading back to 11 - 15 to get either Ross, Howard or Barnett and a extra pick in the 2nd or 3rd round.. The Browns pick at 12 could be the target .. The Browns move up to get one of the young QB's or use the 8th pick to get Grapapplo from the Pat's.. While still getting Garrett at 1. ..

2. I see a combo of Safety and DE in the 1st 3 picks and a 3rd round RB... He brought these older guys in to easy the transition of younger players in a year ir 2..

3. Only RB he likes in the 1st is Fournette.. After that the only RB's i see he might be into are 3rd and 4th round avilable players..

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, E CaT PanTHer 2 said:

or I can see DG moving up to #5 to get either Fournette or Adams. 

He isn't moving up when he has said to many times "this draft is deep" and "you're never 1 player away".. He isn't going to trade away a chance to get atleast 4 future starters for 1..

He can walk out of this draft with a stater at WR and future starters at DE, TE, S, and RB..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Some of you might want to get use to him not valuing RB's like you do...

Gman might be in the '"really not liking to spend a 1st round pick on a devalued position like RB" club.. He is all about value and he has that NY Giants philosphy .. They never draft 1st round RB's..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, WOW!! said:

Some of you might want to get use to him not valuing RB's like you do...

Gman might be in the '"really not liking to spend a 1st round pick on a devalued position like RB" club.. He is all about value and he has that NY Giants philosphy .. They never draft 1st round RB's..

Never say never...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, rodeo said:

Far more likely we package that pick we just got from NE to move up than it is we move down.

Source: Gettleman has never moved down, but moved up every draft.

I disagree.. He is looking to get his future DE, Safety and Weapon on offense in this draft.. You don't trade picks to get less picks in a draft you think is deep..

The other times he traded up the drafts weren't as deep and he didn't have so many picks in the top 100 before. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cam's game is entirely dependent on the RB being a threat so that they can't key on Cam as a runner OR a passer on every down. Stew is unreliable due to health and a struggling OL at times.

A talented RB that we can rely on for the next 5-8 years is just what we need and I think Gman knows that if he knows anything about the build of this team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Trade back with Cleveland and get Barnett

Use the NE second rounder and Cleveland's second to move up and get Ross in the first

Use our second rounder to get Obi

Use the 3rd round comp pick to get the Iowa TE

Use the 4th rounder to get Perine

Use the 5th on a developmental LT like Davenport

Use the sixth and seventh for whatever.

Celebrate

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, XClown1986 said:

Maybe we set up a package of picks to go to 1 and get Myles Garrett

Really??

1st i don't think we have a package good enough to convince Cleveland not to take Garrett..

2nd We aren't one player away..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Me, I'm sick of WWE channel hopping their PLEs and shows. Netflix now with Raw. USA still has Smackdown but you can't get it with Roku if you don't also have cable. Then they went from all the PLEs on Peacock to ESPN+ which required upgrading your Disney+ package. Then they frikkin' move Saturday Night Main Event with John Cena's retirement match back over to frikkin' Peacock, which we'd just cancelled two months prior because no PLEs there anymore. And there are fewer, but longer matches and its the same danged stories again and again. Rematch after rematch after rematch between PLEs. Fewer matches, fewer wrestlers, more promos (of lesser quality) and less action.  It just seems like it's all fillers and re-runs. I'm tired of Cody Rhodes. I'm tired of Jey Uso. I'm tired of the two Brons. Shuffle the deck a bit guys, this game's getting stale.
    • Chuba was 3 yards behind the 3 gap. He was lined up weak offset I. It was a 33 dive. Chuba needed to power through off of Ekwonu's block and slip off into the 5 gap where the Tremble had the lane sealed and Rick pulled the LB out of the 5 gap. Here's a visual if you need proof. Chuba did a jump cut laterally to the 2 gap on the right side with unblocked defenders crashing down and went airborne.   This is a 33 dive that should have been slipped off the block into the 5 gap. Chuba lacked vision, but you can see Rico and Bryce staring at the intended running lane sealed off by Tremble and Ekwonu. He should have read Ekwonu's block. The blocking and misdirection is NOT set up for the right side. The play worked. Chuba failed to execute on this play. Trust who you want to, but I wouldn't suggest you argue with the video. Anyone telling you this was drawn up to go right with the blocking did not analyze it. They are correct it should have been a called dive, and it was a called dive.  This was a weak offset I bringing Tremble in motion from the right to the left.
×
×
  • Create New...