Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Draft Express has us taking Miles Bridges at 11.


nctarheel0619

Recommended Posts

How is Bridges shot?

I haven't watched any college ball, but I saw him against Kansas the other day.

Bridges seemed like a great athlete that played a little out of control, and would sometimes just throw the ball at the rim while being more concerned about initiating contact.

Jackson was burying shots over him too, although some of that may just have been good shooting as Bridges seemed to stay close to him.


Sent from my iPhone using CarolinaHuddle

Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, Wundrbread33 said:

How is Bridges shot?

I haven't watched any college ball, but I saw him against Kansas the other day.

Bridges seemed like a great athlete that played a little out of control, and would sometimes just throw the ball at the rim while being more concerned about initiating contact.

Jackson was burying shots over him too, although some of that may just have been good shooting as Bridges seemed to stay close to him.


Sent from my iPhone using CarolinaHuddle

He was 56-144 from three this season, about 39%. His shot is good but not exceptional, though who knows what an NBA shooting coach could do for the guy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Considering this team will continue scrapping for the 8th SWEEP might have to temper that expectation. Miles is projected between 8-11.

But I do like his game, would be grand to replace him with MKG in the starting rotation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • lol, that second part is quite literally one of the dumbest things ever. Having or not having guaranteed contracts has absolutely nothing to do with how much these billionaires have to pay.  Because there is a hard cap and a minimum cap spend requirement, and teams either use their cap or roll it over to use it all the next year, so the owners have to pay the same amount of money in the end no matter what. Having fully guaranteed contracts in the NFL would only hurt salary cap management, and thus would end up screwing over the team and its fan base when teams kiss on signings as they take up cap room that is needed to improve the roster. Look at the Browns with Watson, they gave him the fully guaranteed deal and all it’s doing is sucking up massive cap space now.  If they hadn’t done that, the owner would still be paying the same amount of money each year as that cap space would still be used elsewhere. If you want to argue for fully guaranteed contracts because the players deserve it, that’s an entirely different argument and a fair one to discuss.  But anyone against fully guaranteed deals isn’t doing it to argue for the billionaire owners.
    • Start posting in threads in the other forums instead of just creating threads. No one comes over here so you aren't starting conversations.  Get your ass up to 100 posts. It's not that hard. Don't create 100 posts. Contribute to conversations. 
    • Ryabkin could be the steal of the draft, he was a Top 10 pick heading into last season and had a rough year.  Lots of GMs passed on him because of that and his workouts. Pick has really high upside and Svech should be able to translate Rod tearing his arse a new one for making dumb plays since Svech has had several years of it.  🤣😂
×
×
  • Create New...