Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Roy Williams says Richard Marshall is terrible


RazzleDazzle

Recommended Posts

Roy Williams said he dropped Romo's first fade pass in the end zone early in the fourth quarter. It looked like Panthers cornerback Richard Marshall broke up the pass, but Williams said, "I put that on me. It was a drop on my behalf. It was close." Marshall and Williams had a running dialogue throughout the game, and it didn't always look friendly: "He's terrible," Williams said of Marshall. "Print that."

http://espn.go.com/blog/nfceast/post/_/id/4072/romo-takes-a-less-is-more-approach-against-panthers

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Marshall wasn't exactly out of position, he was right there but yeah that was more of a drop than anything. Overall, I thought Marshall did a pretty good job though.

Mainly special teams and the offense is why we lost. Defense only gave up 13 points, even with the poor run D.

Four consecutive three and outs to open the second half kept our D on the field. I guess this was RW's best game of the year, i big whopping 75 yards, only cuz Marshall is terrible.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

well, its kinda true, marshall does suck, along with all of our secondary. Especially with that all world shutdown corner chris gamble, the media likes to harp on. did i miss something there? is he that good?

you can honestly say everyone in the secondary stinks...just different degrees of it. Gamble included (and that isn't a flip flop b/c he never played well enough to earn his contract or hype last year).

as far as Roy goes, he didn't do squat to be talking trash.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • He had a turnover on all three goals he was on the ice for. Plus he had that god awful delay of game penalty. Like legit his GS actually shows he was the cause of the loss and he was only on the ice for 12 minutes. You remove him from that game and the Canes win or at worst go to OT.  Let's put this in perspective, in 12 minutes he directly led to 3 goals against. In the 48 minutes without him on the ice it was an even-steven 2-2 game and that's disregarding that god awful delay of game penalty that led to goal number 4 of the 5 given up.      I don't see how anyone could say that he didn't directly lead to the loss.   
    • reality is the piling on of Frank Reich is just the standard huddle angle we take of putting all blame on someone after the fact.   as I was an OG Frank hater before it was cool to be......now the swing goes too far the other way and people will claim me is as a Frank defender.  Frank Reich was the definition of a .500 middle of the road NFL coach.  He technically was a winning coach and above .500 coming here but he is and was NFL average.  we were the biggest joke in a decade.....because they paired Frank Reich (a dude who was going to do what he does in the NFL) with a dude who couldn't do NFL basics and Frank was forced to play him.  That's not Frank being a loser.  That a bad org around Frank. 
    • Toronto is less physical than us, and they took them to 7  I really wish they would have won, because we match up better with them, but we have to deal with what we got  What worries me is Svech trying to take out Bob, that is desperation, that's what you do when you feel like there is no legit options left, it's what I feared, Bob is still in our core groups head, and they are over thinking, over passing Hopefully that changes tonight   
×
×
  • Create New...