Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

REPORT: Browns talked to Panthers about move up from 12


TheSpecialJuan

Recommended Posts

NFL Network's Mike Silver reports the Browns have talked with three teams picking in the top eight about a trade up from No. 12.

Likely to select Myles Garrett at No. 1 overall, the Browns might have to move up from No. 12 for their latest "quarterback solution." The Browns have been linked to UNC's Mitchell Trubisky for months, but his stock is unclear. He could go anywhere from No. 2 to No. 12. The Cleveland Plain Dealer reported as recently as three days ago that the Browns were still seriously considering Trubisky at No. 1, but it's ultimately unlikely.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, X-Clown on 1 said:

I must have smoked some crack, because I have no idea what's going on anymore....

Once you come down off your high you'll realize you haven't missed a thing.  Lot's of reports, sources, and theories with little to no relevance or significance. 

Of course every team is exploring options, but I guess during draft week that turns into news...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, shulasmyhero said:

Once you come down off your high you'll realize you haven't missed a thing.  Lot's of reports, sources, and theories with little to no relevance or significance. 

Of course every team is exploring options, but I guess during draft week that turns into news...

The difference this year especially is that people fully buy in to each and every rumour. it seems.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, shulasmyhero said:

Once you come down off your high you'll realize you haven't missed a thing.  Lot's of reports, sources, and theories with little to no relevance or significance. 

Of course every team is exploring options, but I guess during draft week that turns into news...

Looked at your post and was overjoyed that someone was as over trade talks as I was. Looked at your user name and was immediately horrified. So many mixed emotions.

First one to post a topic not relating to a rumored trade gets unlimited pie from me for every post until after the draft. Yes - we have talked with other teams about trades. Yes - it may happen. No - I do not care that our FO is on the phone right now working on a lot of scenarios with a lot of teams.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Saca312 said:

My ideal scenario is us dropping to 12. 

In that scenario, Saints don't go full stupid and try for McCaffrey, and we get him.

Then trade up to get Njoku and you'll see a very happy man.

Sorry my dreams will come true first.

Fournette at 8

Panthers move back up at 12 or 18 pickup OJ Howard.!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, shulasmyhero said:

Agree and it seems they are doing so no matter how much they contradict each other.

And still trying to figure out how they fit together. I've got to the point in recent years that the draft itself is more interesting if I dont get so emersed in the pre draft stuff. 

I can't wait to see some new debates less of these stupid x > y > z stuff

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It seems the needs for the Panthers are at positions that tend to require intelligence to lift others--going from "good to great"--FS, ILB, and C--as you say. While i like Rodriguez a lot (can see the Hurricanes [Jarvis] and Panthers with a mustache player to get the fans into it)--I also like Golday (WLB?).  However, take a look at smallish Kyle Louis (Pitt).  He is known to be cerebral, but he is small (5'11" I think) and for that, I moved him lower.  But look at the different LB events at the combine--he is near the top in most of them.  I see him as a sleeper.  So if we wait until the second round, we can get a solid LB.   So what if we grab a free agent edge specialist (veteran) for pass situations and help develop Princely.  We draft FS (Oregon) first--maybe trading back to do so--I dunno.  We sign a free agent ILB and draft a rookie like Rodriguez or Louis.  In the third, we could probably find a center, like (former OT Parker from Duke) or Slaughter or Pew (may have to trade up).   So, as you say, others are fighting for Edge players, WRs, and OTs early like seagulls on the beach fighting over spilled corn chips, We sit back, grab intelligent players that make others better.  FS, ILB, and C. OT scares me more that Edge if we do this--but for those screaming for an edge--we have edge players--2 with starting experience who have had some degree of success.  JC Davis can play either T spot and he is good at pass blocking--a bit raw--but could be developmental depth that could play in a pinch. Or you could draft a solid OT with shorter arms that are driving them down into day 3--and convert them to G or C later.  Nijman and BC being re-signed could provide enough to hold down the job until a developmental OT (World, Oregon?) prepares for a shot at it.  Wagner (ND) could play LT but is probably a future RT--he is expected to be drafted early day 3.  My favorite day 3 OT sleeper?  Keagan Trost, Missouri. Great run blocker, soild pass blocker in SEC--just shorter arms.  Maybe a guard down the road, but for the time being, a T.  Not ideal, but at least you are building for the future.  
    • I'm not like most people in this thread in regards to Love. I'm not like most in regards to RBs either. I think certain ones will always be drafted in the first round because they are valued that highly. From an on-the-field perspective, they are as valued as ever; business-wise and contract-wise at times to re-up, that's where things can get tricky with valuation. That being said, Love oozes potential and makes higher-ups' mouths water. I know that he if somehow he is available at 19, he will be considered if not taken. You don't leave that type of talent on the board unless there is another compelling player of arguably equal or more value at another position of need that may have a higher priority (like maybe Sonny Styles). Now all that being said, I  don't realistically see either one of them being there at 19 according to the draftniks.
×
×
  • Create New...