Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Trading up in round 2


Jeremy Igo

Recommended Posts

I feel like Gettleman may want two higher quality players tonight rather than 3 lesser quality ones. We have seen him trade up with less ammunition in the seasons past. 

Should the Panthers move up to mid round 2 instead of the very end, they could possible land 2 more guys that can help on day 1, as opposed to a project 3rd round player. 

What say you? Good chance? If so, who do you like at pick 40 and say 55ish. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Depends who is floating around left on the board. Could see him trade up in the 3rd vs up in the 2nd. 4 players in the top 70-75 would be sweet.

A lot of years, if you said you could get a TE like Leggett with your 4th pick, people woud look at you like your crazy

 

Theres going to be at Least 2 more QBs between now and 75, along with a handful of RBs and LBs, going to be a stud still even if we move up in the 3rd

Sent using the amazing CarolinaHuddle mobile app

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've been going back and forth on this. I think too much needs to be given to take 33 from GB, which would have to be to keep Cam Robinson from Seattle I'd imagine.

35 would be slightly more reasonable to move to, but still just a bit much. 

I think we could really be looking at a trade up to 41 right after, depending on which players are there that we could jump the Saints (42) for. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think we stay put in the early 2nd because so many high grade players at need positions are going to be there. The concept of moving back into the 2nd to double dip a few picks later might be part of the plan if we see a target worth going to get. I just don't see moving up into the 2nd with as much value as there is left right now. Plus, it wouldn't hurt to make all the picks you have instead of burning them to move up with the lack of depth we have at many positions. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

54 minutes ago, ncfan said:

Depends who is floating around left on the board. Could see him trade up in the 3rd vs up in the 2nd. 4 players in the top 70-75 would be sweet.

A lot of years, if you said you could get a TE like Leggett with your 4th pick, people woud look at you like your crazy

 

Theres going to be at Least 2 more QBs between now and 75, along with a handful of RBs and LBs, going to be a stud still even if we move up in the 3rd

Sent using the amazing CarolinaHuddle mobile app

 

 

 

 

We did it for Bradberry & Funchess if ts layer we really like we should grab them. 

TE / S combo

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, The Onion Knight said:

There's still 3 really good safety prospects left so I wouldn't move up for Obi. It'd be crazy if we ended up with Cam Robinson and Josh Jones today.

thats the two i just got in my mock this morning. would be awesome.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The second round, imo, is how Hurney lost his job.  Some of the worst picks in team history.   Why is it so hard?

I think we are poised to draft 2 good players in the second round and I agree we will move up at some point--probably using the comp pick (3rd)) to do so--but maybe the Ealy trade (32nd pick overall) and the 4th will get us up another few spots. What talent is there?  CB, S, and DE.

CB: There si a lot of CB talent in the second--this will tell us if we feel confident about Worley.  I like him, but 8 games playing well does not make a resume. 

SS Obi is expected to go to the Seahawks who will pick before us--will we trade up k to leapfrog them to grab Obi?  I think we like him.

DE: Walker, Willis, and Bashum (my favorite)) are still on the board, not to mention a few other smaller college prospects.  I think we have no choice but to draft a DE in round 2.

WR: Zoy Jones please?  Still, there is a lot of WR talent in the draft and we could find help in the third. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, MHS831 said:

The second round, imo, is how Hurney lost his job.  Some of the worst picks in team history.   Why is it so hard?

I think we are poised to draft 2 good players in the second round and I agree we will move up at some point--probably using the comp pick (3rd)) to do so--but maybe the Ealy trade (32nd pick overall) and the 4th will get us up another few spots. What talent is there?  CB, S, and DE.

CB: There si a lot of CB talent in the second--this will tell us if we feel confident about Worley.  I like him, but 8 games playing well does not make a resume. 

SS Obi is expected to go to the Seahawks who will pick before us--will we trade up k to leapfrog them to grab Obi?  I think we like him.

DE: Walker, Willis, and Bashum (my favorite)) are still on the board, not to mention a few other smaller college prospects.  I think we have no choice but to draft a DE in round 2.

WR: Zoy Jones please?  Still, there is a lot of WR talent in the draft and we could find help in the third. 

 

Your post is well thought it. I don't want you to think I'm disagreeing with you. But, you don't think there's a chance G-Man may be targeting Cam Robinson?

He was considered a 1st round selection at season's end. Now he's still out there at the top of the 2nd round. If we nabbed him he just may be the last piece we need to solidify our OL heading into the 2017 season. He could immediately improve our run blocking and pass blocking which could help Cam revert to his 2015 form.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Double Dip is our annual theme.  Mixon or Cook........    Just kidding

I don't know if it is worth it.  Seems so many are rated about the same in round two.

CBS Sports mocks the second round

http://www.cbssports.com/nfl/draft/news/2017-nfl-mock-draft-second-round-picks-include-dalvin-cook-deshone-kizer/

40. Bashem, DE Ohio

64 Jones, WR ECU

Either of those two and if we move up maybe Baker.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Craig Pruitt said:

Your post is well thought it. I don't want you to think I'm disagreeing with you. But, you don't think there's a chance G-Man may be targeting Cam Robinson?

He was considered a 1st round selection at season's end. Now he's still out there at the top of the 2nd round. If we nabbed him he just may be the last piece we need to solidify our OL heading into the 2017 season. He could immediately improve our run blocking and pass blocking which could help Cam revert to his 2015 form.

Yes I do--II would love Cam--so much depends on Oher's situation.  I rhink he goes early in the round--Dalvin Cook, Robinson, Lamp---I would not be surprised to see them as the first 3 picks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Passer Rating Differential = Offensive Passer Rating  - Defensive Passer Rating    Offensive Passer Rating = how efficient your team’s QBs are. Defensive Passer Rating Allowed = how efficient opposing QBs are against your defense. The larger the positive differential, the more dominant your team’s passing game is relative to opponents’ passing success. Conversely, a negative differential means your defense is getting carved up or your offense isn’t efficient enough. Almost every Super Bowl champion from the 1970s to the present day finished near the top of the league in DPRD (Defensive Passer Rating Differential). https://coldhardfootballfacts.com/stats/passer-ratings-differential Look at where we are #16 and we have a Negative DPRD (-0.36). Every team above us has a a positive DPRD, is .500 or better, and still in running for a playoff spot.  Look at the chart. The best teams in the NFL have the highest DPRD. Only 2 teams below us with a negative DPRD are still in contention or the playoffs: #19 San Francisco (-4.44) and # 21 Tampa Bay(-6.62). And, Tampa has no shot if they fail to beat us down the stretch at least once. The teams with the highest negative DPRD always seem to be at the bottom of the standings. I didn't learn about this stat until 15 years ago. It's amazing how it always seems to accurately predict who will be in playoff contention year end and year out. 1 = Los Angeles Rams 111.76 85.23 26.53 2 3 Philadelphia Eagles 100.00 75.57 24.43 3 1 Seattle Seahawks 100.30 77.42 22.88 4 1 Buffalo Bills 104.20 82.66 21.54 5 1 Los Angeles Chargers 91.46 71.19 20.27 6 1 Houston Texans 90.70 72.40 18.30 7 1 Detroit Lions 110.41 94.40 16.01 8 1 New England Patriots 109.10 96.75 12.35 9 3 Green Bay Packers 102.95 92.09 10.86 10 1 Denver Broncos 89.21 78.78 10.43 11 1 Indianapolis Colts 95.12 85.91 9.21 12 = Pittsburgh Steelers 97.42 89.90 7.52 13 = Baltimore Ravens 93.87 86.91 6.96 14 2 Jacksonville Jaguars 88.07 81.23 6.84 15 4 Chicago Bears 89.48 88.70 0.78 16 2 Carolina Panthers 88.77 89.13 -0.36 17 2 Arizona Cardinals 93.49 95.79 -2.30 18 1 Kansas City Chiefs 88.85 92.46 -3.61 19 1 San Francisco 49ers 96.87 101.31 -4.44 20 1 Atlanta Falcons 87.50 92.50 -5.00 21 3 Tampa Bay Buccaneers 89.77 96.39 -6.62 22 = Dallas Cowboys 98.69 108.92 -10.23 23 = New York Giants 87.74 98.84 -11.10 24 1 New Orleans Saints 84.97 96.17 -11.20 25 1 Miami Dolphins 88.33 102.37 -14.04 26 3 Minnesota Vikings 75.03 90.31 -15.28 27 3 Las Vegas Raiders 83.50 99.14 -15.64 28 = Cincinnati Bengals 84.51 104.46 -19.95 29 2 Washington Commanders 87.24 107.74 -20.50 30 3 Cleveland Browns 70.46 91.41 -20.95 31 1 New York Jets 77.75 104.86 -27.11 32 = Tennessee Titans 76.27 106.03 -29.76  
    • Yeah and truthfully I’ll be ok with that as long as the talent and culture is building. 
    • We have been on the right side of one score games.  But like minny a few years ago and KC, we know that isnt sustainable and we probably will revert back to the nfl mean.  Which could mean a poo season incoming if this offense doesnt figure poo out
×
×
  • Create New...