Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Rookie Minicamp Updates/Tweets

bobsfoodbasics

Recommended Posts

steven8989 Newbie

steven8989

Posted
Posted
all that is very different from the physical beating a RB not a WR that's why RBs careers are so short look at Jamal Charles. When its all said and done he will have a hard time getting back up when it comes down to week 12 & s/o to you for bringing up Woodhead and then saying he's not woodhead lmao

He will be way better than Woodhead. He is going to be an every down back. Count on it!!!

Sent using the amazing CarolinaHuddle mobile app

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Montsta Community Regular

Montsta

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, SJTG4 said:

If yall had Cam's back like yall have CMC before even stepping a foot on the field maybe he would've dove on that ball in the super bowl

Now you are just obvious in your pathetic trolling attempt. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Fox007 Grand Master

Fox007

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, ARSEN said:

LeSean McCoy is 5'11 and 207lbs...  Is LeSean a shitty NFL RB?  Or are you saying white people more fragile? 

He's trying to get banned and I hope he succeeds. The mods should seriously get a hold of the troll accounts and/or alts it's seriously not funny anymore.

People should also ignore them and stop responding.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
pantherclaw Grand Master

pantherclaw

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, SJTG4 said:

stop sneak dissing son I said he's not an NFL RB and he won't be

 

https://www.quora.com/What-is-the-average-height-and-weight-of-a-running-back-in-the-NFL

"Top 5 rushers of all time.

A running back needs to be able to get low to the ground and gain leverage on the run, and while not using his hands. He needs a strong center of mass so he is more difficult to tackle. Finally, he needs to have a solid build that is able to withstand the constant full-speed pounding their job requires from them.

  1. Emmitt Smith 5′9″ 210 lbs - Known for his freakish durability and amazing field vision. missed 2 games in his whole career with Dallas, and that was a contract holdout. He would miss more at Arizona at the end of career, but he’d already broken Payton’s record.
  2. Walter Payton 5′10″ 200 lbs- Despite his nickname, “Sweetness”, Payton was better known for his powerful running and phenomenal durability.
  3. Barry Sanders 5′8″ 200 lbs- The ultimate elusive back. When you watch a “Greatest Runs of All Time” reel, chances are, you’ve seen Sanders carry the ball. Retired early for a few reasons.
  4. Curtis Martin 5′11″ 210 lbs- Great field vision, and got this far without the fanfare of the other four backs on this list. His time with the Patriots and Jets saw consistent play and an unshakable will.
  5. Ladanian Tomlinson 5′10″ 215 lbs- Mr. San Diego. In my opinion, he was the most complete running back on this list, with Payton being a very close second. He not only ran the ball with agility and power, but he was also a great pass-catcher and a by-the-book blocker.

These backs have something in common- they are just under six feet tall and weigh in the low 200’s. Some on the top rushers’ list are larger (Jerome Bettis) or smaller (Warrick Dunn), those ranges seem to be the prototype"

 

I am a fan of the big bruising type of RBs. Love Stew. 

That being said, CMC isn't too small.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Montsta Community Regular

Montsta

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, pantherclaw said:

 

https://www.quora.com/What-is-the-average-height-and-weight-of-a-running-back-in-the-NFL

"Top 5 rushers of all time.

A running back needs to be able to get low to the ground and gain leverage on the run, and while not using his hands. He needs a strong center of mass so he is more difficult to tackle. Finally, he needs to have a solid build that is able to withstand the constant full-speed pounding their job requires from them.

  1. Emmitt Smith 5′9″ 210 lbs - Known for his freakish durability and amazing field vision. missed 2 games in his whole career with Dallas, and that was a contract holdout. He would miss more at Arizona at the end of career, but he’d already broken Payton’s record.
  2. Walter Payton 5′10″ 200 lbs- Despite his nickname, “Sweetness”, Payton was better known for his powerful running and phenomenal durability.
  3. Barry Sanders 5′8″ 200 lbs- The ultimate elusive back. When you watch a “Greatest Runs of All Time” reel, chances are, you’ve seen Sanders carry the ball. Retired early for a few reasons.
  4. Curtis Martin 5′11″ 210 lbs- Great field vision, and got this far without the fanfare of the other four backs on this list. His time with the Patriots and Jets saw consistent play and an unshakable will.
  5. Ladanian Tomlinson 5′10″ 215 lbs- Mr. San Diego. In my opinion, he was the most complete running back on this list, with Payton being a very close second. He not only ran the ball with agility and power, but he was also a great pass-catcher and a by-the-book blocker.

These backs have something in common- they are just under six feet tall and weigh in the low 200’s. Some on the top rushers’ list are larger (Jerome Bettis) or smaller (Warrick Dunn), those ranges seem to be the prototype"

 

I am a fan of the big bruising type of RBs. Love Stew. 

That being said, CMC isn't to small.

And boom goes the dynamite. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
d-dave Veteran

d-dave

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, pantherclaw said:

That being said, CMC isn't toO small.

Spelling/Grammar SNIPE!

How dare you insult us all! =P  

The counter argument is that NFL players are bigger, stronger and faster than even when LT played.

Personally, I'm excited to see how it all works out.  I really want CMC to be that home run hit we've missed for a long time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
L-TownCat Grand Master

L-TownCat

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, SJTG4 said:

all that is very different from the physical beating a RB not a WR that's why RBs careers are so short look at Jamal Charles. When its all said and done he will have a hard time getting back up when it comes down to week 12 & s/o to you for bringing up Woodhead and then saying he's not woodhead lmao

My boy @ARSEN has executed a flawless victory.  You stuck your foot in your mouth and he shoved it down your throat.

 

BRAVO! Arsen!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites
imminent rogaine Proficient

imminent rogaine

Posted
Posted
57 minutes ago, dpm0409 said:

The game is constantly evolving.  The "standard" measurables for particular positions don't even really apply anymore.  Teams are figuring out how to use these hybrid players.  Especially on defense (look at Shaq on our team).  Same applies for CMC on the offensive side of the ball, we just have to utilize him the proper way.

I hope that he panthers are one of these teams that can figure out the hybrid player.  Arizona has figured it out. New England has figured it out. I'm hopeful that we can do it as well/  I don't think we've quite done it with Shaq. He'd be on the field a lot more if we had.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • tukafan21
      With the first pick, don't draft a QB? Draft a DE? C'mon!

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      LOL... Yet again proving you can't look below anything than what you see on the surface Mock drafts ARE NOT draft grades They are what people think will happen.  They are mocking teams taking QB's in the top 5 of the draft because that's just historically how drafts go regardless of the grades on the QBs.  Almost every draft expert, even those mocking QB's going high, have said time and time again that none of these QB's actually grade out as those type of picks. This is again, where I say you don't like to actually read what I have to say, because I already explained it. 2022 the exact same thing happened, mock drafts had guys like Pickett and Willis going in the Top 5 because that's just what teams usually do, but GM's listened to their prospect grades and knew they weren't worth taking that high, so they didn't. It's not to say QB's won't go that high this year, but it's to say that they aren't graded out as elite QB prospects.  Mock drafts 
    • CamWhoaaCam
      With the first pick, don't draft a QB? Draft a DE? C'mon!

      By CamWhoaaCam · Posted

      Have you seen the mock drafts lately?   Most of them have us taking a QB. Just because you aren't high on these QBs doesn't mean the Panthers or other teams aren't.   If you want me to be real I just think you a Tmac homer and all you care about is us drafting him. It's why you get so defensive when people mention other prospects.   Be open to other people's ideas. Nobody in this thread is saying anything bad about your boy Tmac. 
    • tukafan21
      With the first pick, don't draft a QB? Draft a DE? C'mon!

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      Oh good lord Interest doesn't mean interest in making a bad trade to take the player, that's why I had such a long post, to accurately describe why those are two different things, but you don't like to listen to that stuff.  Being interested in a player doesn't live in a vacuum. It's very simple... there isn't a #1 draft pick type of grade on any of these QB's, if there was, we'd just take them.  You can't bluff a pick everyone knows you won't make, and trying to trade the pick is the CLEAR signal that you're not taking the QB. Just because the Raiders would have interest, doesn't mean they're going to bail us out of a situation we don't want to be in, they'd be smart about it and just sit put, let us take a non QB as we'd be telling the world we're not taking one just by trying to trade the pick, and then they'd take him at #2 (either with their own pick or by trading less to get that one). Oh, and your point of "if nobody is willing to make the trade, you obviously just take the best QB" is quite literally the dumbest thing I've ever read on here. If nobody is willing to trade up to take the QB, then it's OBVIOUS that the QB isn't worth taking with that pick, so OBVIOUSLY taking the best QB there is just OBVIOUSLY stupid and a bad pick. The moral of it is if there is a QB worth taking, we're taking them and not making the trade.  If there isn't a QB worth taking there, nobody is trading up to #1 to take one, we just showed the NFL how bad of an idea that is 2 years ago, it's really not hard to see. You keep making up this mythical situation where there is a QB who has shown to be worth trading up to #1 for and we'll be able to leverage that into a trade.  But we're the most QB needy team in the league, if we end up with the #1 pick, either we are taking a QB #1 or no QB is going #1 unless we get VERY lucky and two teams in the Top 5 fall in love with one prospect and we can play them off each other and fleece one of them. But again, I can't see that happening, as if there was a QB worthy of that, we're just taking him ourselves.
×
×
  • Create New...