Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Drug Test Paranoia


The Huddler

Recommended Posts

Help me out, I'm paranoid. 

 

Got a random drug test from my job yesterday, the 10th of May. 

 

On draftnight thursday the 28th of April my buddy was tokeing up and i was pounding beers. We were in his living room. Normal sized for a 2 bedroom apartment. 

 

Any reason to believe the 2nd hand smoke would make me fail my test a day short of two weeks later? I sniffed the fug out of that nug too. I wanted it badly but resisted. The room didnt stink of weef too bad. Didnt notice it much but thats with being in the room for an extended period of time and maybe going nose blind. He was bonging it and holding it in a lil bit. I didnt feel high, yet i was drunk so who knows. 

 

This might seem silly but im paranoid. Its why i havnt smoked for years through school and theres no chance of me smoking now as an RN. 

 

i wish i could smoke.  So much healthier than drinking

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, The Huddler said:

Piss test. 

 

Other than that idk

Well other than a sample of your hair it doesnt get any more accurate than a urine test from what I have read.  If you are really worried you could get one of those test your self kits to check, but who knows how accurate they are.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here's something to make you feel better: did you feel high? I know you said you were drinking but still: If you didn't feel high that means not enough weed got into your body to create the effects of being high and therefore it's infinitely less likely any is stored in your body especially after a few weeks. Our bodies are really good at clearing substances and it takes a relatively large amount of THC before it starts getting stored for long periods of time. 

Further, those urine tests are not very sensitive. Anecdotally I've seen plenty of people pass those that had no business passing. Hair tests are much, much more sensitive. 

I understand why you're concerned. Hell I haven't smoked in like 2 years and I just had a drug test and I was kinda worried the morning of. It's completely normal to feel a little spooked about it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • He’s kind of overrated to be honest. Never really felt like a true #1 or elevated his play to become a guy the defense really has to worry about. 
    • I'm going to be real, the reason that vote ended up so lop-sided by the end was directly due to my programming. So there's nothing tongue in cheek about it. Also I left PFF after the Collinsworth acquisition (didn't want to move to Cincy) but have stayed involved in analytics via backdoor channels, but I can absolutely say that the experience was eye-opening, not because those guys are unquestionable football savants and that I became one by proxy, but because the amount of information that becomes available outside of what the typical fan has access to is revelatory and also really drives home how much context is still being missed even with all of that information. You don't discover that you know everything, you discover how much you still can't know no matter how hard you try, hence my point about the NFL not being able to figure out what makes a QB good. There's a lot of AI work going into that now and even that only seems to further confuse things vs. actually enlighten the problem. In the professional realm teams don't really talk about quarterbacks as A strictly being better than B, but how A can potentially perform better than B given a specific context of C. Of course those contexts may be wider for A than B, but there's also contexts where B can outshine A, even with lesser talent surrounding them. So what good teams strive to do is ultimately define a process of how they want their entire team to operate under schematically, find players that fit that scheme, and hopefully find a guy whose skillset will be maximized running that scheme with those players. Where bad teams fall of the wagon is constantly shifting those schemes and chasing bad fits or fads vs. sticking with a core identity and developing it.
    • there is a 100 mile long list of NFL players and coaches going to bat and defending horrible play from teammates.   
×
×
  • Create New...