Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Drug Test Paranoia


The Huddler

Recommended Posts

Help me out, I'm paranoid. 

 

Got a random drug test from my job yesterday, the 10th of May. 

 

On draftnight thursday the 28th of April my buddy was tokeing up and i was pounding beers. We were in his living room. Normal sized for a 2 bedroom apartment. 

 

Any reason to believe the 2nd hand smoke would make me fail my test a day short of two weeks later? I sniffed the fug out of that nug too. I wanted it badly but resisted. The room didnt stink of weef too bad. Didnt notice it much but thats with being in the room for an extended period of time and maybe going nose blind. He was bonging it and holding it in a lil bit. I didnt feel high, yet i was drunk so who knows. 

 

This might seem silly but im paranoid. Its why i havnt smoked for years through school and theres no chance of me smoking now as an RN. 

 

i wish i could smoke.  So much healthier than drinking

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, The Huddler said:

Piss test. 

 

Other than that idk

Well other than a sample of your hair it doesnt get any more accurate than a urine test from what I have read.  If you are really worried you could get one of those test your self kits to check, but who knows how accurate they are.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here's something to make you feel better: did you feel high? I know you said you were drinking but still: If you didn't feel high that means not enough weed got into your body to create the effects of being high and therefore it's infinitely less likely any is stored in your body especially after a few weeks. Our bodies are really good at clearing substances and it takes a relatively large amount of THC before it starts getting stored for long periods of time. 

Further, those urine tests are not very sensitive. Anecdotally I've seen plenty of people pass those that had no business passing. Hair tests are much, much more sensitive. 

I understand why you're concerned. Hell I haven't smoked in like 2 years and I just had a drug test and I was kinda worried the morning of. It's completely normal to feel a little spooked about it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I thought he had a few really nice flashes.  I can see him showing out this year 
    • I have heard that before--when standing in front of a full body mirror at Old Navy.  I said it, actually. Seriously, Let's go on what we know. There is reason for optimism that exceeds random opinions and negativity: 1. Last year, the offense was the priority and the interior offensive line was the focal point. Morgan addressed it in free agency and the draft. They improved.  2.  Last year, Canales pulled Young after 2 games and replaced him with an established veteran.  Instead of giving up on Young, he developed him, primarily focusing on his footwork and timing.  Continued development in his fundamentals should result in improved play.  (this is significant because some athletes rely on natural ability and do not adapt well.  They resort to old habits. This means that Bryce is "teachable" and is willing to face adversity and fight through it.  That is what you want in a QB.) 3. Morgan drafted a raw talent at WR; and we all knew he was raw.  Huddlers are already calling it a bust, but his productivity numbers were in line with the other WRs drafted around where he was drafted.  So, yes, he was a bit disappointing, but what part of "Raw" is not understood here?  Evil Bryce, then inconsistent Dalton, then good Bryce--all while facing the top defensive backs--and let's not forget about his lingering injuries--and we should understand XL's productivity.  Morgan was looking for a home run based on XL's 1-season productivity and his freakish athleticism, but I always thought we would not know what we have until year 2.  TMac alone will make XL better--a solid #2. 4.  If you blame Morgan for drafting XL, you must give him credit for making Coker a priority free agent.  In my view, he addressed WR in 2024 pretty effectively in the long view.  5.  Let's look at the rest of the draft.  Brooks?  The best RB in the draft in round 2?  Morgan was attempting to build a solid run game behind Bryce.  Wallace was a very solid third round pick at LB. Sanders is a strong TE for a fourth round pick. 6.  Not much is being said about the development of Chau Smith-Wade.  His improvement mirrors Bryce Young's, actually.  In his first 8 games, his PFF rating was 36.5.  In the final 9 games, his PFF rating was 66.7.   7.  With so many needs, Morgan hit the UDFA market with success. In addition to Coker, Demani Richardson got 400+ snaps and had a 60.1 PFF grade, including an interception. 8.  In free agency, Morgan spent big bucks on Guards, a move that made his QB better. He added David Moore, Nijman,  He signed Clowney, Wonnum, Robinson, Jewel, Chaisson, Fuller, Scott, D. Jackson, Dionte Johnson, etc.  A few years of Fitterer left him with more holes that players.  Some did not work out, but he did all this on a budget (after he splurged on Lewis and Hunt).  It is hard to get a free agent to come to a team that loses--so in some cases, Morgan had to overpay or accept questionable players. Morgan's first year as a GM demonstrated an understanding of the game like we have not seen since Polian, before his lost it. Canales, on the other hand, should be rated by the improvement of players.  Zavala, Ekwonu, Mays, Young, Smith-Wade, Coker, Wallace--all improved.  He had to overcome major losses such as D. Brown, Shaq, Dionte Johnson, Corbett--and we saw growth.  Despite all this team went through, after 8 games of disarray, This team finished 4-5 with close losses to both Super Bowl teams.  Frankly, I do not know how he did it. This year was better.  The WR room is solid with depth.  The OL room is solid with depth.  The TE room is as good as it has been in a while.  The RB room has the potential to be as good as it was when we had 28 and 34.  DBs?  Better.  DL?  Better.  Edge?  better.  The bottom of the roster?  Much better. We really don't know what we have yet, and that makes this offseason exciting.      
    • Here you go. 2 yards. Bryce Sneak.mp4
×
×
  • Create New...