Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Drug Test Paranoia

The Huddler

By The Huddler,
in Huddle Lounge

Recommended Posts

The Huddler Veteran

The Huddler

Posted
Posted

Help me out, I'm paranoid. 

 

Got a random drug test from my job yesterday, the 10th of May. 

 

On draftnight thursday the 28th of April my buddy was tokeing up and i was pounding beers. We were in his living room. Normal sized for a 2 bedroom apartment. 

 

Any reason to believe the 2nd hand smoke would make me fail my test a day short of two weeks later? I sniffed the fug out of that nug too. I wanted it badly but resisted. The room didnt stink of weef too bad. Didnt notice it much but thats with being in the room for an extended period of time and maybe going nose blind. He was bonging it and holding it in a lil bit. I didnt feel high, yet i was drunk so who knows. 

 

This might seem silly but im paranoid. Its why i havnt smoked for years through school and theres no chance of me smoking now as an RN. 

 

i wish i could smoke.  So much healthier than drinking

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Paa Langfart Grand Master

Paa Langfart

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, The Huddler said:

Piss test. 

 

Other than that idk

Well other than a sample of your hair it doesnt get any more accurate than a urine test from what I have read.  If you are really worried you could get one of those test your self kits to check, but who knows how accurate they are.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
SOJA Veteran

SOJA

Posted
Posted

Here's something to make you feel better: did you feel high? I know you said you were drinking but still: If you didn't feel high that means not enough weed got into your body to create the effects of being high and therefore it's infinitely less likely any is stored in your body especially after a few weeks. Our bodies are really good at clearing substances and it takes a relatively large amount of THC before it starts getting stored for long periods of time. 

Further, those urine tests are not very sensitive. Anecdotally I've seen plenty of people pass those that had no business passing. Hair tests are much, much more sensitive. 

I understand why you're concerned. Hell I haven't smoked in like 2 years and I just had a drug test and I was kinda worried the morning of. It's completely normal to feel a little spooked about it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • PNW_PantherMan
      Off Season Thread

      By PNW_PantherMan · Posted

      That's my biggest concern with making him the 2C.  You split up the Aho Jarvis bromance that accounted for a lot of points.  If Jarvis excels as a C, it could help the team even more though.
    • PanthersNCSU
      Barnwell - Ranking WR, TE, RB Groups in NFL

      By PanthersNCSU · Posted

      The Saints being that high is the one that killed me. Chris Olave might not know his name at this point, Shaheed is coming off injury as well, so 31 year old Brandin Cooks might be your best WR...coming off a 260 yard season over 10 games. Kamara is Kamara, but didn't have 1,000 yards last year and is about to turn 30.  Toss in the fact that Taysom Hill may be the best QB on the team and I truly don't understand Barnwell's thoughts beside seeing the names "Olave" and "Kamara" and going yep, that sounds better than "Chuba" and "Thielen". 
    • TD alt
      Barnwell - Ranking WR, TE, RB Groups in NFL

      By TD alt · Posted

      Now now now, I wouldn't say there is no logic, but there's just not a lot of in-depth thought put into Barnwell's  "analysis." Now to be fair to him (and other national writers), pre-season team rankings are basically clickbait. And...Barnwell, himself, said that "there's a lot of projection here." He basically admits that he doesn't know how the hell things are going to turn out with our receiver group. He also said that "I find myself" more intrigued by Coker than Legette; that does not mean that he said that fans should be, or that Coker will even be better than Legette (regardless of ESPN's per-route-run stat). So, yeah, Barnwell said some things, but even he has to basically admit that he doesn't know how bad or good that our playmakers will be in 2025.  Overall, what Barnwell is basically thinking is that the Panthers have gotten worse at the offensive skill positions, and baked into that is that others have gotten better. That's the argument in July (meaning, please don't give this any more weight than it's due). I would personally be surprised (not shocked) if we end up worse than the Titans, Pats and Giants at least. Once you throw in the Bills, Giants, Jets, Steelers, and even the Chargers, I personally think there are several teams' skill groups that may end up ranked lower than ours by the end of 2025.  @kungfoodudeis one of my dudes, but like others he is over the tipping point. He's had enough. Seeing is believing. I will say this though: Barnwell's piece is less about logic than just good ol' opinion. And to be honest, he might as well be a Huddler throwing out sh¡t in the summer based upon nothing but good feels or bad feels.  Our offense as a whole (just like any other team's) is going to depend upon the play of the O-line and especially the QB. How you can even rank the skill positions without expressly baking those two things in the cake is beyond me. I would dare say that that's not even logical. 
×
×
  • Create New...