Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Somehow Cam is still a Top 100 player. Gets ranked 44th in NFL Top 100.


Recommended Posts

11 hours ago, Saca312 said:

Had an underrated season. NFL Players understand the situation Cam was in with his o-line and wide receivers, and know he's still a threat.

Not surprised of his drop, but understand why he's even still on the list. People are giving him a second chance, because they know that Cam is better than what 2016 suggested.

Lol man you take the cake on being a homer...he made it because its a popularity contest. Adrian Peterson made the list with 72 yards rushing on 1.9 ypc last year. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, TheRed said:

In all seriousness. Other players see Cam Newton out there sacrificing his body to make plays for the team. Even if you might not like his personality, you have to respect his dedication, and his warrior mentality on the field. This speaks volumes, and is a direct shot across the bow to the dipshit naysayers.

^This. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Ball4life said:

Lol man you take the cake on being a homer...he made it because its a popularity contest. Adrian Peterson made the list with 72 yards rushing on 1.9 ypc last year. 

He's the biggest homer on this site.  No surprise there.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • lol, that second part is quite literally one of the dumbest things ever. Having or not having guaranteed contracts has absolutely nothing to do with how much these billionaires have to pay.  Because there is a hard cap and a minimum cap spend requirement, and teams either use their cap or roll it over to use it all the next year, so the owners have to pay the same amount of money in the end no matter what. Having fully guaranteed contracts in the NFL would only hurt salary cap management, and thus would end up screwing over the team and its fan base when teams kiss on signings as they take up cap room that is needed to improve the roster. Look at the Browns with Watson, they gave him the fully guaranteed deal and all it’s doing is sucking up massive cap space now.  If they hadn’t done that, the owner would still be paying the same amount of money each year as that cap space would still be used elsewhere. If you want to argue for fully guaranteed contracts because the players deserve it, that’s an entirely different argument and a fair one to discuss.  But anyone against fully guaranteed deals isn’t doing it to argue for the billionaire owners.
    • Start posting in threads in the other forums instead of just creating threads. No one comes over here so you aren't starting conversations.  Get your ass up to 100 posts. It's not that hard. Don't create 100 posts. Contribute to conversations. 
    • Ryabkin could be the steal of the draft, he was a Top 10 pick heading into last season and had a rough year.  Lots of GMs passed on him because of that and his workouts. Pick has really high upside and Svech should be able to translate Rod tearing his arse a new one for making dumb plays since Svech has had several years of it.  🤣😂
×
×
  • Create New...