Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

How does a movie like CHiPs get made?


Jangler

Recommended Posts

16 hours ago, dos poptarts said:

Someone built a real Awesom-O 4000 and is using it in Hollywood to pitch ideas.

My Proof: Adam Sandler is still making movies (to be fair, I did enjoy the Cobbler)

 

yeah, I enjoyed The Cobbler also.

But this ChiPs movie, WTF????  This was pure poo! how does it it get 51% on Rotten Tomatoes?? has to be illegal money somewhere.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Millions and millions of books out there, with more being written each day, and yet Hollywood relies on reboots, remakes and re-imaginings of old TV shows. It's because Hollywood is illiterate. The fact that they can't read a script well enough to tell it is crap just further proves the point.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 6/13/2017 at 3:10 PM, dos poptarts said:

Someone built a real Awesom-O 4000 and is using it in Hollywood to pitch ideas.

My Proof: Adam Sandler is still making movies (to be fair, I did enjoy the Cobbler)

 

top 10 Southpark Episode ever

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 6/14/2017 at 6:23 AM, Jangler said:

yeah, I enjoyed The Cobbler also.

But this ChiPs movie, WTF????  This was pure poo! how does it it get 51% on Rotten Tomatoes?? has to be illegal money somewhere.

Did you actually go see it / rent it? I knew from the trailer that it was trash. It actually has 51% of RT? I weep for the movie consumer.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

While I agree, I don't know if this is really a new phenomenon.

I mean, some years back a group of movie executives put their heads together and collectively decided it would be a great idea to spend millions of dollars making movies built around Pauly Shore.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Disclaimer: Kinda always liked Jane Kaczmarek.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

I rarely think about a bad movie once its over. But this one really has me up at nights.  (i work 3rd...) 

the biggest head scratch was Jane Kaczmarek"s 'nude scene' She was in the movie 2 seconds at the front, then you see a body double do a topples scene at the end. Was anybody clamoring to see her topless to begin with?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, Mr. Scot said:

While I agree, I don't know if this is really a new phenomenon.

I mean, some years back a group of movie executives put their heads together and collectively decided it would be a great idea to spend millions of dollars making movies built around Pauly Shore.

A few years ago Jim Carrey wanted to do a Six Million Dollar Man movie, of course without the adjustment for inflation...But so many of these TV reboots have gone the comedic way, except for CHiPs, that the Six Billion Dollar Man would be the way to go now. Of the few shows for the 70s, I think it could be done, with the right people and no money laundering.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Really? You don't see why a team can't draft a QB in the 1st round while then starting their former #1 overall pick over them while on the last year of their deal? It puts the team in a TERRIBLE place no matter how the season goes.  If Bryce sucks, you have to answer questions as to why he was still on the team to begin with, let alone starting over the rookie.  If he's good, then you run into the situation the Vikings were in last offseason with sticking with the rookie contract or the the guy who just performed instead of said young QB. It's one thing when teams keep a vet around as a bridge QB, it's something entirely different when that QB is still only in their mid 20's and was taken #1 overall by that team.   That just doesn't happen and not sure it ever has in NFL history before.
    • What is the alternative? - BY, will not play for less then his perceived contract (just like Cam Newton did). So you pay him top of market as befitting a 1st round, Heisman winning, playing birthing QB would get. Or you cut him. - Then we are forced to either sign a stop gap QB / previously failed QB and try to fix him or you spend a 1st round pick and draft a guy, basically resetting the team.  The reality is that we all want a top 5 QB. The problem is there are only 5 of those guys in the world and drafting, even #1 overall doesn't guarantee that.  The other problem is the NFL market. Young QB get paid. Even an average, young QB gets top of market deals. I know a lot of people here think we could sign him to an 'average QB contract' but thats not reality. Didnt happen with Cam wont happen with BY.  So we could let this season flush out and he is again a middling QB. But then we cut and restart or accept it is what it is (including compensation) and build a team around what we have.  My money is on the latter. 
×
×
  • Create New...