Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

4-5 Situation - Howard, Marvin, Zeller, Kaminsky

davos

By davos,
in Charlotte Hornets

Recommended Posts

davos Grand Master

davos

Posted
Posted

Our most common lineup last year was Kemba-Batum-MKG-Marvin-Zeller

2. Kemba-Batum-MKG-Marvin-Frank

3. Kemba-Batum-MKG-Marvin-Hibbert

4. Kemba-Batum-MKG-Frank-Zeller

5. Kemba-Bellinelli-Batum-Marvin-Zeller

6. Kemba-Bellinelli-Batum-Frank-Zeller

Now you have to imagine if we're seeing a long term fit with Zeller and Frank, but they'll have to continue to progress and gain minutes.  HOWEVER, we just landed Dwight Howard and we used Marvin to his max capacity last season.  

So the dilemma I see is: We've got two big contracts in Howard and Marvin with two promising young guys in Kaminsky and Zeller..but is someone is going to be rendered expendable here? 

 

Would we be better off relieving ourselves of Marvin?  Or maybe trading Cody? Or does this seem like a good group to create lineups around?  

In general--I just think we're kind of sitting with players like Marvin, Lamb, and MKG right now.  It's not that they're awful but they are just sucking up minutes, cap, or both and don't fit long term.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites
yasuhara2241 Contributor

yasuhara2241

Posted
Posted
8 hours ago, davos said:

Our most common lineup last year was Kemba-Batum-MKG-Marvin-Zeller

2. Kemba-Batum-MKG-Marvin-Frank

3. Kemba-Batum-MKG-Marvin-Hibbert

4. Kemba-Batum-MKG-Frank-Zeller

5. Kemba-Bellinelli-Batum-Marvin-Zeller

6. Kemba-Bellinelli-Batum-Frank-Zeller

Now you have to imagine if we're seeing a long term fit with Zeller and Frank, but they'll have to continue to progress and gain minutes.  HOWEVER, we just landed Dwight Howard and we used Marvin to his max capacity last season.  

So the dilemma I see is: We've got two big contracts in Howard and Marvin with two promising young guys in Kaminsky and Zeller..but is someone is going to be rendered expendable here? 

 

Would we be better off relieving ourselves of Marvin?  Or maybe trading Cody? Or does this seem like a good group to create lineups around?  

In general--I just think we're kind of sitting with players like Marvin, Lamb, and MKG right now.  It's not that they're awful but they are just sucking up minutes, cap, or both and don't fit long term.   

We just resigned Cody until 2020-21 and Frank will be on his rookie contract until 19-20. I think we don't need to worry about this at all. The biggest issue we have will be Kemba, but since Kemba and Dwight expire at the same time we will have plenty of money. That Howard trade really helped free up Miles 12m at the right time. 

Now, as far as fit is concerned. Zeller just makes everybody look better. He will help out the second unit tremendously. I think he will be a great fit with Monk and Frank in that 2nd unit. 

Teams go small, take out Dwight put Zeller in. Marvin not shooting well, but in Frank and team with Dwight or Zeller. 

We now have options, something we didn't have last year. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest OGHornetMike

Guest OGHornetMike

Posted
Posted

We are in a great situation. Starting 5 Kemba Nic MKG Williams Howard. 2nd unit. (New PG from free agency) Monc Bacon/Lamb Frank Cody. We have options 1st time in years. Any real Hornet fan knows and understand this is a great situation. Lot of work to do but I like the challenge!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Wundrbread33 Grand Master

Wundrbread33

Posted
Posted

I see Frank being the ideal fit with Dwight, and Marv with Zeller.

 

Comparing Marv and Frank: Marv is the better rebounder and defender of the two, while I see Frank as the better overall offensive talent.

Frank's rebounding liability is completely made up for by Dwight, and I think Frank's creativity offensively (and range) opens the lane up for Dwight.

Marv can play well with either (he obviously is a solid stretch 4 as well, with range), but if Frank continues to build off of his second half performance from last year, he will need to garner those starting minutes with Dwight.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
davos Grand Master

davos

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Cool cool trying gauge some opinions here; didn't know if anyone thought Zeller became a tradeable asset or whatnot. Seems like a really solid group on the offensive side that can rebound on both ends.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Wundrbread33 Grand Master

Wundrbread33

Posted
Posted
On June 24, 2017 at 9:17 PM, davos said:

Cool cool trying gauge some opinions here; didn't know if anyone thought Zeller became a tradeable asset or whatnot. Seems like a really solid group on the offensive side that can rebound on both ends.

I really like our bigs now that we have a legit shot blocker down low. Zeller is a unique big because of how he moves. A PnR defending big like him is a rare commodity, and I love his passing and his rolling dunks. 

Much like MKG, I believe Zeller is "learning to shoot the three" away from being a completely different beast though. I hope to see both extend their range. If they do, look out!

Link to comment
Share on other sites
WOW!! Grand Master

WOW!!

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, OldNorthPowell said:

And a back up PG.  I am not sure if that was mentioned........Oh NVM.

Yes I would love for them to bring back Woods  and sign Premesenke ( whatever) the C from Gonzo and a backup PG

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • BEASTfromdaEAST
      Most hated teams

      By BEASTfromdaEAST · Posted

      After Bountygate and the information that came out on the Saints owners shielding pedophile priests in New Orleans it will forever be the Saints numero uno for me. FUG THE SAINTS! I hope this is just the beginning of a long term period of suffering for that shitty organization run by even shittier human beings. #2.Pats/Belicheat #3. Falcons (Mike Vick years then Matt Ryan/Julio running it up) Ryan pooping his pants and 28-3 def makes my bad days always better just thinking of those. #4 Pretty much any franchise fan base thats obnoxious Steelers, Eagles, Bills, Jets, Giants, Cowboys, etc.
    • BEASTfromdaEAST
      PFF Best Rookies so far: Two Panthers

      By BEASTfromdaEAST · Posted

      Thank God DM used that #8 pick on a bona fide WR1 and not some bum pass rushing prospect like Stewart or someone else. I believe Tet is legit WR1 material and going forward will be our long term answer at that position since we desperately were in need of one once they traded away DJ Moore.  Tet could possibly end up even being better long term than someone who I respect a ton as a WR in Moore. Evans has been a pleasant surprise and great TE/FB depth piece going forward who could make the most of his opportunities.  Any good offense worth a damn in the NFL has 3 TEs that can do multiple things and being scared by Ian Thomas play for years should makes us all appreciate what Evans is quietly doing as a ROOKIE at one of the hardest positions to learn at the pro level.  Keep cooking DM. This season is not over obviously but seeing some growth out of young talent finally is a breathe of fresh fuggin air for once. 
    • mav1234
      PFF Best Rookies so far: Two Panthers

      By mav1234 · Posted

      Saw this show up in my new feed. Nice to see a couple of our rookies making it into the top 5 so far, even if it is a pff measure... From https://www.pff.com/news/nfl-top-15-rookies-week-9-2025 ... 4. TE Mitchell Evans, Carolina Panthers (78.7) Evans struggled in the Panthers’ tight win over the Packers, finishing with a 41.8 PFF overall grade — third worst among tight ends this week. He was not targeted in the game and played only one snap in pass protection. He did log 15 run-blocking snaps, and although he earned a 68.9 PFF run-blocking grade in zone looks (seven snaps), his 39.0 mark in gap schemes (second worst for the week) dragged him down to a 46.6 PFF run-blocking grade overall — sixth worst for the week. Despite seeing zero targets over his past two games, Evans still leads the Carolina tight end group with a 74.3 PFF receiving grade. He has caught all nine of his targets for 90 yards, six first downs and two touchdowns. Evans also leads the Panthers’ tight end group in PFF run-blocking grade (72.2). He has recorded a 20.5% positive play rate across 175 snaps.  5. WR Tetairoa McMillan, Carolina Panthers (78.6) McMillan had a better day against the Packers, recording four catches for 46 yards. Most of that production came in the first quarter via two 16-yard catches — one of which he snatched from Carrington Valentine’s hands, who was in perfect position to break up the pass. McMillan accounted for three first downs on the day, although Green Bay was able to limit his impact after the catch, holding him to 0.8 yards after the catch per reception. McMillan now has 41 catches for 558 yards — a top-15 mark. He is also tied for second with 19 explosive gains of 15-plus yards. Three of McMillan’s catches against the Packers came between the numbers, bringing him to 22 for 318 yards and 19 first downs (tied for second most) this season. He owns a 26.1% threat rate and a 76.6 PFF receiving grade between the numbers. He also ranks in the top 10 in explosive gains (10) and yards after the catch per reception (5.5) within that area of the field. 
×
×
  • Create New...