Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

2017 Huddle Candy Draft


Jeremy Igo

Recommended Posts

The idea of a candy draft intrigues me. Thus, we shall conduct one. 

Rules: You must select a candy commonly found at any USA gas station. No weird candies. No candies from overseas. No ice cream bars. Items must be commonly found in the candy aisle. 

ROUND 1 - 5 picks

 

Pick 1 - Reese's Peanut Butter Cups - I dare anyone to seriously argue against this pick. The best of both worlds in one delicious package. 

Pick 2 - The original Plan M&M's - So versatile this candy is. Trips, movies, or just at home. Individual morsels that melt in your mouth, not in your hand. Pure genius. 

 

 

 

Please give your thoughts on what the next pick should be. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm on board with Reese's at 1 but only if we all agree that it is pronounced like any normal human being would pronounce "Reese" and then add the apostrophe "s". Like something belongs to Reese Witherspoon. Like the creator was probably named Reese and this is his fugging candy. People that say "Reesies" or "Reesy" cup make me want to assist them with seppuku.

Twix is def a top 5 candy. I'll throw in 5th Avenue as a top 5 submittal. Not quite as commercial as some others but man it is a good candy bar.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

watchamacallit is strong... 

I have to go Kit Kat.  

It is first off all chocolate with crunchy wafers...

Secondly, it doesn't have peanut butter so won't put some of us into allergic shock. 

Most importantly, if you have to share, it's divided appropriately for almost any occasion. 

1 kit kat =  sharing with more than 1 person, little kids, and " I don't know how I feel about you" and family members you don't  you don't like.

2 kit kat = wives, girlfriends you may be serious about, people you respect. 

3 kit kat = I was scared you might take the whole thing or you look like you needed this more than me. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Which is why I'm all for trading Lamelo. Guy misses half of every season. I swear he just likes to sit on the bench to show off his street clothes. I think it negatively impacts the other guys who do the same. If guys don't want to play, they don't need to be here. Coach and gm need to get stricter
    • See, I have a different view of it. I think that just the opposite is very true, and often proven on our very own team.  Look at the impact that CMC had when he was here.  Look at how bring in two top rate IOL to play guard last season made a huge difference in finally getting a stable front for Bryce to live behind. It took a while for it to bear fruit, but those last games were just relevatory. And off ball linebackers like Luke Kuechly, not just running a defense but dictating the game when he's on the field, truly remarkable what a difference that makes. Personally, he had as much or maybe even more to do with that Super Bowl appearance as Cam did.  What I see in the NFL is teams trying hard to cover up for a lack of good linebackers by stacking the D-line. But it gives them a crust defense, one that is hard and crunchy on the outside but a feast within. Linebackers shouldn't just rule the middle of the field, but should be directing traffic and working as enforcers.  But hey, whatever. "Devalued" positions often come back to bite you in the ass when they are neglected. Ask anyone who has had to clean up the mess left behind by a former college coach who took over a pro team and brought their college recruiting mindset in. Yanno, like Matt Rhule did.   
    • I see it this way--XL was raw.  Raw players when drafted who are forced to start immediately are very raw players in the NFL-- How is he helped? TMac will shift the focus of the defense away from XL.  XL will be more experienced.  He will have an offseason of jugs work.  He is a very good athlete.  He can only get better.  Wallace?  Same thing.  He will get better with an improved defensive front and the addition of these heat-seeking head hunters at S.  I think about the players we will have on defense in 2025 that we did not have in 2024. Derrick Brown. DE Brown III NT Wharton DE Jones Edge Moehrig S Princely. Edge Scourton. Edge Ransom. S Cam Jackson NT Roseboom  LB While we may not know what we have, we know what we don't have--  
×
×
  • Create New...