Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

What pass defenses do we need to be worried about?


rayzor

Recommended Posts

Just looking at our schedule and while i'm of the belief that our pass blocking and passing game overall will be improved, i think we've still got a few challenges.

as far as pass rushes, we're going up against 4 teams that were top 10 in sacks last year... vikings, packers, bills, and bucs.

i looked at QB ratings against and only the vikings were in the top 10, but eagles and bills were 11 and 12 there.

in comp% bills, eagles, and vikings were in the top 10, but pats and 49ers were also 11 and 12 there.

overall i guess beyond maybe the vikings, bills, and eagles i don't think there's a whole lot that we need to worry about. 

am i wrong? I mean i probably am, but who am i missing?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Vikings defense is a challenge, but their offense is a lost hope. 

Green Bay's defense is the suck. They lost a lot of good players (including Peppers) in free agency. Don't expect them to be dominant again.

Buccaneers d-line is always going to be something with McCoy and Spence, but they really haven't improved at all this past off-season at that sector.

Bills. McDermott's leading that. It'll be a new scheme and likely better, but still don't think it'll be that much of a challenge.

I did a SoS thread a while back looking at a certain chart that takes into account a lot of variables. This article is also good to read too:

https://twoqbs.com/qb-profiles/cam-newton-fantasy-qb-with-upside/

View image on Twitter

The Panthers offense has a super easy schedule. It's not even funny.

  • Passing -  The Panthers go against the 24th hardest schedule against pass rush defenses (17th in 2016), 30th hardest in pass defense efficiency (6th in 2016), and 32nd hardest in yards per pass allowed (21st in 2016). 
  • Rushing - The Panthers go against the 32nd hardest schedule against run defenses (28th in 2016) and 29th hardest in RB pass efficiency (25th in 2016). 
  • Red Zone Efficiency - The Panthers go against the 31st hardest red zone defenses (29th in 2016), and 20th hardest against 3rd down conversion prevention defenses (19th in 2016).

The Panthers offense has the easiest schedule in the NFL, and it's not even close. That should bode really well for our new offensive scheme and future. Cam Newton should be pressured less, and our wide receivers will have much easier competition in comparison to last year. Our rookies should also shine against the easier competition.

Expect a lot of points to be scored.

Defensively, it's a lot tougher in comparison to our offense, but not significantly different from last year. 

  • Passing - The Panthers go against the 2nd hardest schedule against pass efficient offenses (7th in 2016), 2nd hardest in Yards Per Pass Attempt (3rd in 2016), but do get to go against slightly easierpass protecting offenses (6th hardest in 2017; 4th in 2016).
  • Rushing - The Panthers go against the 1st hardest schedule against rushing efficient offenses (21st in 2016), 1st hardest against RB pass efficient offenses (1st in 2016), but remain at 32nd hardestgoing against explosive rushing offenses (same as 2016). 
  • Red Zone Efficiency -  The Panthers defense go against the 1st hardest schedule against red-zone offenses (3rd in 2016), and the 2nd hardest against 3rd down converting offenses (5th in 2016).

Screen-Shot-2017-07-19-at-5.02.15-PM.png?resize=840%2C586

Pass Blend combines pass efficiency, yards per pass attempt, explosive passes, and pass rush efficiency. As you can see in the visual above, the Panthers have the easiest “Pass D Blend of Opponents” by a wide margin.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

^Yep.  I'll never underestimate the Vikings D again after they whipped us in the 2nd half last year.  But they were also lucky to not be blown out at halftime after an awful week of chaos in Charlotte.  They also faded big time down the stretch and yes, their offense is a joke.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Worry about whichever one we're facing that week. There's a reason why there's only been 4 winless teams in NFL history. Every team consists of professional players assembled by professional front offices and coached by professional coaches. As soon as you overlook one, they're gonna catch you napping.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Vikings and it's not even close. 

They took Denver's blue print of blitzing to keep RB's and Olsen in to block  and added a bunch of double A gap blitzes.  

 

Please note: people did that to us all year, because we had:

1. No WR that could beat press consistently. So people were able to blitz with single high safety a lot. 

2. Did not get rid of the ball quickly.  Blame Shula all you want, but if it wasn't a screen Cam rarely looked underneath first no matter what coverage. 

3. Both of our tackles got absolutely demolished by speed rushers (including Oher before injury). 

4. Our line calling went down dramatically with Kalil out, and it wasn't breathtaking before he went out either. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Worry about whichever one we're facing that week. There's a reason why there's only been 4 winless teams in NFL history. Every team consists of professional players assembled by professional front offices and coached by professional coaches. As soon as you overlook one, they're gonna catch you napping.

I think we can discuss it. We aren't playing or coaching 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, csx said:

I think we can discuss it. We aren't playing or coaching 

I mean, we can discuss it but we're basically trying to predict the future. Some of these defenses we'd likely overlook right now will end up being a lit better than expected and some of theae good defenses may underperform or have a key injury or two that really changes them.

I guess I just dont see the point, but discuss away.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, RetiredCollegeCoach said:

All of them.

Wonder Woman cannot handle the quick-release short game our new look will demand; defenses will feast. 

I've grown weary of your wonder woman crap along with all your other constant lame attempts at nick names for players you don't like. Your schtick got old a while back and it's bordering on spamming. I don't like spamming. You won't like being considered a spammer. Knock it off. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Ok fair to judge only his starts.  But you do acknowledge that going from "he's waaaay above league average in a number of categories" to "here's a single stat where he's above league average (not "waaaay") and another where he is exactly at the league average" is a pretty significant backpedal, no?  I'm guessing he's probably in the ~10th range for completion percentage too if we're only looking at starts (I'm too lazy to isolate his starts and do the calculations), so I'll grant you that one too.  But I don't think completion percentage is all that meaningful as a standalone stat if it isn't bolstered by good TD%, Y/A, etc. On that note, for how much people like posting Passing Charts in here (*cough* CRA) - if you peep Shough's passing charts, he hasn't completed a single 20+ yard pass in the past 3 games combined.  His last one was in Week 13 against the Dolphins, which was a single pass of 24 yards.  I just want to be consistent in how we apply our standards - I think it's always been warranted to criticize Bryce for it (even dating back to his rookie season), but do we suddenly not care about that with Shough? And yeah I did acknowledge that Saints' fans have reason to be excited about him and complimented his poise, which is giving my props.  Still not sure I agree that he looks better than a "ton" of QBs nor do I think you or anyone have really demonstrated that.  I think you are generally one of the more reasonable level-headed posters which is why I'm confused at what I consider to be rather hyperbolic language about Shough.
    • I don't disagree with you, but want to point out that Tremble's strong suit has always been blocking. Case and point: on Horn's 25 yard run, he lays down not 1 but 2 nice blocks...and is looking for #3! https://www.panthers.com/video/jimmy-horn-jr-s-25-yard-run-gives-panthers-red-zone-access-on-first-drive
    • It is a popularity contest.  The selection does have meaning though. It is also 1 of the criteria that is considered for the HOF. The game does not have any significance. The team hasn't been to the playoffs in nearly a decade. That's why they don't get primetime national coverage. To the victors go the spoils.
×
×
  • Create New...