Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Peter King is Really Annoying


dldove77

Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, hepcat said:

Peter King once said Matt Moore would lead the 2010 Panthers to a 10-6 record and a playoff appearance. Since then I've never took anything he's said seriously.

Never forget our 2015 team he called 7-9 at best. And his 3 year petulant feud with Cam because he didn't want to give an interview. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, pepaw said:

Never forget our 2015 team he called 7-9 at best. And his 3 year petulant feud with Cam because he didn't want to give an interview. 

Oh, don't get me wrong. Fug Peter King. I just think in this particular scenario you gotta reach pretty hard to take issue.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is nothing to be offended by here.  King wasn't talking about a dud from the Panthers perspective, he was talking about the Patriots making a trade that turned out to be a dud.  It was a dig at NE, had nothing to do with the Panthers (other than being the team they traded with). 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I've seen enough tape review to see that we run crossers...we have dudes in the middle of the field. I have to think that this is a harder area for someone of Bryce's stature to hit. You have to see directly over the center of the line and is probably where the most interceptions happen (he has thrown a LOT of his picks by not seeing a dude in the middle of the field).
    • I’m pretty sure we did end up getting the first in that drive, but I don’t remember. It was obviously a catch the ball didn’t move 
    • While I don't think NFL games are fully rigged, it's certainly closer to a scripted outcome than we all think. The NFL by their own admission in court is not a fair and balanced sporting event. It is a managed entertainment product, a "spectacle" as they've put it, that now has sports betting as a huge financial pillar of their business model. It's ridicuously naive to still think the NFL isn't using referees to manage the games towards certain outcomes, using "replays in the booth" and overturning calls, choosing to overlook penalties at critical moments and calling questionable and sometimes phantom game changing penalties at other critical junctures of games. The NFL has always done this going as far back as the '60s, and they were investigated by the FBI in the '70s which found a large number of ownership groups had ties to the mob. So when the overwhelming majority of the moneyline bets were on the Panthers vs the Saints last week, and suddenly we see some strange and ticky tack penalties we've rarely seen called on the Panthers all year, I just know there's more going on behind the scenes. And suddenly next week, the Panthers will probably be nudged to a win, to keep the NFC South race interesting, as I see the Bucs are the favorite as of now and most moneyline bets will trend towards the Bucs until during the game when the Bucs are leading heading into the 4th quarter, and the Panthers are nudged to a win. At least, that's what the NFL and Vegas probably want to happen. 
×
×
  • Create New...