Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Marty Hurney Vent Thread


the butch

Recommended Posts

I wasn't agreeing or disagreeing with the argument. Just pointing out that production is a different word than player. But I agree with @NanuqoftheNorth that Hurney hamstrung the team with poor decisions but gets credit for the good decisions of bringing in some of our core group of players. I neither hate nor love Hurney and I thought DG did a good job. I'm hopeful, because I'm an optimist, that Hurney will make (and has made) good decisions going forward.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, rico6 said:

Okay. Who?

Who has Gettleman surrounded Cam with? It was only for a short lived 2015 season that Newton had an above average OL.

Instead of you Gettleman lot trying to find each failure and fault that Hurney is to be blamed for, how about first giving the man some good damn credit and be fuging objective.

Edit- Also, Hurney trading for and drafting 2 of this team's best players ever >> just about anything Gettleman's ever done for the team offensively.

 

Gettleman has done some nice things on offense. 

Gettleman netted us Norwell, Turner, Williams, Moton, M. Kalil, Benjamin and CMC.  He set us up for years with solid core pieces.  But the best thing he did was re-sign Cam at a fair contract.  Lord knows what Hurney would have paid him, but I guarantee it would have been significantly more than what we are paying now.  Gettleman didn't draft Cam - but he kept him here at a fair price.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, Moorgan said:

I don't really care about you guys arguing but I noticed this. Production is different than players. And I don't think it's a stretch to say the majority of the offensive production is Cam, Stew and Greg. I mean that's pretty standard right there. No one would really argue that. So, in that sense, the Hurney guys are the majority of the offensive production. Just thought I'd point that out.

I get what you're saying, but how much production so those skill players get with nobody blocking?

Unless we're switching to flag football, you can't just divorce those two aspects of the offense and put one in a vacuum.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

I get what you're saying, but how much production so those skill players get with nobody blocking?

Unless we're switching to flag football, you can't just divorce those two aspects of the offense and put one in a vacuum.

Yeah I agree but that's not how production numbers are used by fans...or agents for that matter. So I think for purposes of their argument, it's a valid point.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Moorgan said:

Yeah I agree but that's not how production numbers are used by fans...or agents for that matter. So I think for purposes of their argument, it's a valid point.

I understand.

If the topic is offensive production though, as opposed to individual production, you can't really separate them. Heck, you can't really even separate the skill players from each other.

Remember when the Bucs signed Alvin Harper to a big contract, then found out quickly he wasn't scaring anybody without Michael Irvin on the other side?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Mr. Scot said:

Yet Hurney had those same players and still wound up with high draft picks because of lousy seasons.

Odd, huh? 

Yeah, no.

Gettleman literally lucked up into getting an in-prime Cam and a one season removed DROY in Luke to begin his legacy.

You're so full of poo, Scot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, iamhubby1 said:

 

Just because he hangs out at the Strip Club doing blow all day, does not make him a drunk. Dang man, if you gon troll, at least get your facts straight. You sir, are fake news.

Haha. Fair enough but his reputation is amazingly accurate. Most GM's are 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, rico6 said:

Yeah, no.

Gettleman literally lucked up into getting an in-prime Cam and a one season removed DROY in Luke to begin his legacy.

You're so full of poo, Scot.

Cam had tools, but not the experience.  He is now 28.  His best years are ahead.  I think Cam's prime starts now.  Sadly, Gettleman will miss it.

Luke has been helped immensely by having Star and Short in front of him - Gettleman's first two picks.  Those two plus Leveon Bell, Shelden Richardson, and Ansah might be the best NFL players from that entire draft.  The days of snagging 2 potential all-pros in a single draft appear over.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, rico6 said:

Yeah, no.

Gettleman literally lucked up into getting an in-prime Cam and a one season removed DROY in Luke to begin his legacy.

You're so full of poo, Scot.

You still haven't answered why the previous guy - who also had Cam, Luke, Olsen, all those other guys, etc - didn't build a team that could muster a winning season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Just because all draft picks are a gamble doesn't mean you don't have a better chance at hitting on a better player the higher you're drafting. It would literally be like someone saying, I'll give you 1 or 2 free spins on a slot machine, and you say you'll take the 1 because you're not likely to win anything anyways with 1 or 2, so why bother? The Cowboys desperately wanted T-Mac, but because they were 4 picks behind us, they weren't able to get him.  If you told Cowboys fans that had they lost 2 more games last year in a lost season, that it would get them the player they wanted so badly, would they in retrospect go back and lose those games to get their guy? 95% of them would take that trade off in a heartbeat, and the others who wouldn't are the fans who would rather enjoy an extra win or two in a poo season to then set themselves up to be better for the next decade. I also think the fans who argue against this thinking, get too caught up in the "well that means you're going to be rooting against us late in the season even if we still have a shot at the playoffs." Which isn't true, it's saying if you're telling me right now we'd make the playoffs but lose in the first round, that I'd rather end up 8-9 or 9-8 and just miss the playoffs because in our opinion, the benefits that come along with that outweigh the benefit of the players getting 1 game of playoff experience.
    • In relation to tanking. I think you can count on one hand the number of people here who actually want us to lose football games. When accounting for it across the fanbase it amounts to maybe 2% of the entire Panthers fanbase. But you engage with some internet trolls and think haters are coming out of the woodwork and hey look at that it's all a conspiracy that leads to Bryce Young haters. Do you hear yourself sir? If it sounds ridiculous that's because it is. I mean at this point do you see Bryce haters in your dreams? As far as the culture of this franchise goes we seem to be doing better in that department via what we are building right now and with the people we have in place. But we also shouldn't just make assumptions just yet either. The rubber still needs to meet the road. And going back to previous seasons I think we can acknowledge although tanking obviously isn't a thing there were some times where we thought our culture was improving but really it wasn't. Yes I'm looking directly at some of those wins under Wilks. If the culture had truly changed we would not have lost to the Steelers who have been mediocre for years at home the way we did and they were starting Mitch Trubisky ffs. We did not change our culture for the better and we won games that ultimately meant nothing. It was just a brief mirage. We've done this for years now. The harsh truth of the matter is the Panthers have not had a winning season or been to the playoffs in going on 8 years but in those years they've been trying to convince themselves they aren't poo but in the process all they've done throughout most of that time period is squander better draft position and we were still the worst team in the league for our troubles. At the end of the day we should be able to just be adults and reconcile with that. And no that isn't being "pro tank" or any other boogeyman term it's simply recognizing reality.
    • He's an asset in a game manager role. But as soon as you have to ask him to go out there and try to make plays and not just take what the defense is giving him... well, Darnolding happens.
×
×
  • Create New...