Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Offenses Last Night


Nate Dogg

Recommended Posts

Does anyone else get depressed when watching the offenses in other NFL games? Last night when the announcers were talking about Goff's .46 second release time I couldn't help but think how bad I wished we had even a 4.6 second release time. (Exaggerated a bit I know but not really) It really makes you see how fugging terrible our offensive system is when you see the 49ers hanging 39 points on a respectable Rams defense with Brian Hoyer and a bunch of slightly above average at best skill players.

A quote from halftime last night in regards to Gurley this year versus last - "It's amazing what can happen with a real offensive coordinator." I'm afraid this is unfortunately going to be the case for CMC. In my eyes Shula has already proven through 2 games he just does not have what it takes. The scary thing is... With all the talent we have on this team there's no way they're ever going to be bad enough to blow it all up. We'll always be just good enough for the coaches to justify keeping their jobs. 2015 was our chance and we let it slip. Will we ever be a serious contender again with this coaching staff?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The season will go two ways.

1. Offense starts hitting on all cylinders and team makes a playoff run - optimism for the future

2. Offense is inept and holds back a top-tier defense, team performs below expectations - Shula is fired, (Ron might get the ax and/or Hurney does not become full-time GM) optimism for the future

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, rhyslloyd said:

Hey, remember 2015 when all of the stars aligned, and the Panthers scored points?  Let's talk about that for the next 5 years and give Shula a pass instead of facing the current reality. 

i'm gonna talk down to you and say you don't know football because i watched terry bradshaw in my bellbottoms 40 years ago

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, rhyslloyd said:

Hey, remember 2015 when all of the stars aligned, and the Panthers scored points?  Let's talk about that for the next 5 years and give Shula a pass instead of facing the current reality. 

Exactly, and yet Shula STILL couldn't seal the deal. This franchise loves living in the past. You make a superbowl and your job is safe for another 10 years regardless of what you do. It's called being content, which is why this franchise STILL doesn't have back to back winning seasons.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • You may be interested to know that the average depth of separation is dependent upon the type of route run. Though go-routes are the most type of route run, they also produce the least amount of separation (and, of course, completions).   "The average pass catcher runs a go route on nearly a quarter of all routes (22.3%), the highest percentage of any route type in our data. However, those routes are targeted roughly 1 out of 10 times (10.8 percent), the lowest target rate of any route. The WR screen is the least-run route (3.4%), and it's the only route where the average target is behind the line of scrimmage. But it's also targeted at the highest rate (40.7%) and early in the play (1.6 seconds average time to throw). The most targeted routes outside of the WR Screen? The out (27.8%) and slant (25.2%) routes are the next most popular across the league."     "The most valuable routes by expected points added per target were the post (+0.48) and corner (+0.43) routes. The go route (+0.19) ranked seventh on the list of 10 route types. The go route (+0.19) ranked seventh on the list of 10 route types. One possible reason for this: It's harder to separate on go routes, which put the player on a straight path, than on posts or corners, which ask the player to make a cut. Targeted pass catchers on posts and corners average 2.4 yards and 2.3 yards of separation from the nearest defender, respectively, while pass catchers targeted on go routes average just 1.8 yards of separation."   https://www.nfl.com/news/next-gen-stats-intro-to-new-route-recognition-model#:~:text=Targeted pass catchers on posts,) and slant (+0.26).   I would expect that Thielen would have an easier time catching the ball based that he runs the routes where it's easier to get open. Tet? Yet to be seen, but we may be better served getting him on some slants and crossers also.  In general, receivers are going to average a lower completion percentage and yards of separation on certain types of routes than others, that's why we shouldn't necessarily be taking stats, even advanced ones, at face value, as there are dynamics that most aren't even thinking about.  In terms of Tet, he's bigger and somewhat slower than a smaller dude, so you'd expect him not to have as much separation on go-routes, but his catch radius is massive and his hands are awesome. Hitting him in stride will probably be killer, but of course QBs are less accurate on go-routes according to the stats. Depending upon Tet's route versatility and how he is used, we could have a unicorn though. He's relatively fast, has great hands and gets YAC (and on an off note, if X can hold on to the ball, he's dangerous as well because he already has shown some separation ability).    
    • Most elite WRs aren't necessarily burners. Not a lot of elite WRs in the modern era were 4.3 guys. If anything, sometimes it seems like the super fast guys use their speed as a crutch and it hampers their development in the intricacies of route running.
×
×
  • Create New...